Fixed point sets of equivariant fiber-preserving maps
Rafael Souza, Peter Wong

TL;DR
This paper extends fixed point set characterization results to equivariant fiber-preserving maps on G-spaces, broadening the understanding of fixed points in symmetric topological structures.
Contribution
It proves an equivariant analogue of Brown-Soderlund's theorem for fixed point sets in the category of G-spaces and G-maps, generalizing previous results.
Findings
Established necessary and sufficient conditions for fixed point sets of G-equivariant fiber-preserving maps.
Extended classical fixed point theorems to the setting of G-spaces with group actions.
Provided a framework for analyzing fixed points in symmetric fiber bundle contexts.
Abstract
Given a selfmap on a compact connected polyhedron , H. Schirmer gave necessary and sufficient conditions for a nonempty closed subset to be the fixed point set of a map in the homotopy class of . R. Brown and C. Soderlund extended Schirmer's result to the category of fiber bundles and fiber-preserving maps. The objective of this paper is to prove an equivariant analogue of Brown-Soderlund theorem result in the category of -spaces and -maps where is a finite group.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Fixed point sets of equivariant fiber-preserving maps
Rafael Souza
Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul
Peter Wong
Bates College
Abstract
Given a selfmap on a compact connected polyhedron , H. Schirmer gave necessary and sufficient conditions for a nonempty closed subset to be the fixed point set of a map in the homotopy class of . R. Brown and C. Soderlund extended Schirmer’s result to the category of fiber bundles and fiber-preserving maps. The objective of this paper is to prove an equivariant analogue of Brown-Soderlund theorem result in the category of -spaces and -maps where is a finite group.
keywords: fixed points, equivariant maps
AMS subj. class. [2010]: Primary: 55M20; Secondary: 57S99
1 Introduction and statement of results
A well-known and important question in classical topology is the fixed point property. Recall that a topological space is said to have the fixed point property if every (continuous) map must have a fixed point such that . A related question is the so-called complete invariance property for deformation (CIPD). We say that has the CIPD if for any nonempty closed subset , there exists a selfmap homotopic to the identity such that . In [9], H. Schirmer generalized the concept of CIPD and gave necessary and sufficient conditions for a nonempty closed subset to be the fixed point set of a map in the homotopy class of a given selfmap . That is, given a map , Schirmer determined when a closed nonempty subset can be realized as for some homotopic to . Upon relaxing the conditions given by Schirmer, C. Soderlund together with R. Brown [3] generalized Schirmer’s result to fiber-preserving maps of fiber bundles.
Suppose that is a compact connected polyhedron without local cutpoints and is a closed subset imbedded inside a subpolyhedron that can be by-passed in , that is, every path in with , is homotopic to a path in relative to the endpoints. H. Schirmer [9] introduced the following two conditions to realize as the fixed point set of a selfmap in the homotopy class .
- (C1)
if there exists a homotopy from to the inclusion ; 2. (C2)
if for every essential fixed point class of , there exists a path with and relative to the endpoints.
Soderlund [10, Theorem 3.5] showed, by relaxing the assumption on given by Schirmer, the following result.
Theorem 1.1**.**
Let be a compact, connected polyhedron with no local cut points and be a closed locally contractible subspace of such that is not a -manifold and can be by-passed in . Then for some if and only if (C1) and (C2) are satisfied.
Subsequently, R. Brown and C. Soderlund [3] introduced analogous conditions in the fiber-preserving setting. Let be a (locally trivial) fiber bundle and a fiber preserving map.
- ()
if there exists a fiber preserving homotopy from to the inclusion ; 2. ()
if for every essential fixed point class of , there exists a path with and relative to the endpoints.
Following the terminology of [3], we call a suitable pair if is a finite polyhedron with no local cut points and is a closed locally contractible subspace of such that is not a -manifold and can be by-passed in .
In [3], it was shown that conditions and are also sufficient. The following is their main result.
Theorem 1.2**.**
Let be a fiber bundle where and are connected finite polyhedra, a fiber preserving map and a closed locally contractible sub-bundle of such that each component of is contractible and for all sub-bundle fibers of , are suitable pairs. Suppose and are satisfied and intersects every essential fixed point class of for at least one in each component . If is a closed bundle subset of that intersects every component of , then there exists a map that is fiber preserving and fiberwise homotopic to () such that .
In particular, when , this theorem shows that and are necessary and sufficient for for some .
Many applications involve symmetries in the presence of a group action. As a result, equivariant topology has been proven to be useful in the study of nonlinear problems. In the equivariant setting, we are concerned with a group acting on a space together with a -map which respects the group action, that is, for all , for all . In this case, the fixed point set is a priori a -invariant subset of .
In [9], Schirmer observed that for a given selfmap of an -sphere, , any closed nonempty proper subset of can be realized as the fixed point set of a map with . However, such phenomenon does not hold if we impose a group action as we show in the following example, which gives the underlying motivation for this paper.
Example 1.3**.**
Let , and the action is given by . If then is -invariant, but there is no -map that is -homotopic to the identity map such that .
In fact, suppose there is a -homotopy from to such that . Then, preserves , where and . Hence, and and the path defined by is such that and . But, this is impossible.
In this situation, the location of in is more important than its topology, because if we replace by then:
[TABLE]
is a -homotopy (with polar coordinates) between the identity and the -map such that .
Example 1.4**.**
It is easy to see, by modifying the last example, that the equivariant analogue of Schirmer’s result does not hold in general. Let , and the action is given by . The set is -invariant and consists of two points. The same argument as in Example 1.3 shows that cannot be the fixed point set of any map -homotopic to the identity map while satisfies the conditions of Schirmer’s result for can be by-passed since has codimension in .
The main objective of this paper is to give an equivariant analogue of Schirmer’s result and of Brown-Soderlund’s result. This paper is organized as follows. In the first section, we briefly recall the non-equivariant results of [9] and [3] and review some basic background on -maps and -spaces where denotes a compact Lie group. Then we review the necessary equivariant Nielsen fixed point theory from [13]. In section 2, we prove our first main result, an equivariant analogue of [9]:
Theorem 1.5**.**
Let be a compact Lie group, be a compact and smooth -manifold and be a nonempty, closed, locally contractible -subset of such that for each finite we assume that , and is by-passed in , for all . Suppose that the following conditions holds for a -map :
- ()
there exists a -homotopy from to the inclusion ;
- ()
for each finite , for every -essential fixed point class of there exists a path with , , and
Then for every closed -subset of that has nonempty intersection with every component of there exists a -map , -homotopic to with .
In the last section, we apply Theorem 1.5 to prove an equivariant analogue of [3] when is finite:
Theorem 1.6**.**
Let be a finite group, be a -fiber bundle where , and are compact and smooth -manifolds, , , for all , , , for all .
Let be a nonempty, closed, locally contractible -subset of such that is -fiber bundle pair with respect to the fiber bundle , be a closed -subset of such that each component of is equivariantly contractible and is by-passed in , for all . Let be a subbundle fiber of such that is a closed and locally contractible -subset of and is by-passed in , for all , and be a -fiber-preserving map such that intersects every essential -fixed point class of for at least one in each component , for all . Suppose that the following conditions hold for and :
there exists a -fiberwise-homotopy from to the inclusion ;
for every -essential fixed point class of there exists a path with , , and
Then for every nonempty closed -bundle subset of that intersects every component of there exists a -fiber-preserving map , -fiberwise homotopic to with .
In order to establish the notations, let be a topological group and be a (left) -space. Given a subgroup of we denote by the normalizer of in , is the Weyl group of in . The orbit type of is the conjugacy class of in denoted by . If is subconjugate to , we write .
If , then denotes the isotropy subgroup of , and is called an isotropy type of . We denote by the set of isotropy types of . Moreover, , , and .
If is finite (in particular when is finite), we can choose an admissible ordering on such that implies . Then we have a filtration of -subspaces where for some
If is a -map, then is a -map. Let and . If then if either for some or such that relative to endpoints. Then is an equivalence relation on and the equivalence classes are called the fixed point classes of . Evidently, a -fixed point class is a disjoint union of a finite number of ordinary fixed point classes of and thus the fixed point index is defined as . A -fpc (fixed point class) is essential if . For further information on equivariant Nielsen fixed point theory, see [13]. Throughout, by a smooth -manifold , we assume that the fixed point set is a smooth connected submanifold for each isotropy subgroup .
2 Proof of Theorem 1.5 - An equivariant analogue of a result of Soderlund-Schirmer
If is a smooth -manifold and is a closed smooth -submanifold of , being a finite group, then there exists a smooth equivariant triangulation as proved in [8]. If is another closed smooth -submanifold of then there is a smooth equivariant triangulation and -subdivisions of and of such that is a simplicial -homeomorphism, where and are smooth -triangulations (see [8]).
By Corollary 3.3.5 of [11] and being finite, we can find unique -subcomplexes of and of such that is a refinement of and is a refinement of . Then, is a -subcomplex of and a -triangulation of . In fact, . Hence, by induction if is a finite collection of closed smooth -submanifolds of then there exists a smooth equivariant triangulation and a finite collection of -subcomplexes of such that is a -triangulation of , for .
To realize as the fixed point set of some , it is necessary to remove every fixed point of outside of . Hence, we need to extend the notion of neighborhood by-passed for a closed subset as in [10, Definition 2.1] in order to handle these undesired fixed points.. Thus, a -invariant subset is said to be -neighborhood by-passed if there exists an invariant open subset such that and can be by-passed in .
We observe that if is a -ENR pair then is an invariant neighborhood retract in and if is a finite collection of closed smooth -submanifolds such that , then () remains a by-passed -subset of provided is by-passed in . Furthermore, a close inspection of the proof of Theorem 2.2 of [10] indicates that the same argument works for the same result in the equivariant setting. That is, if is a by-passed locally contractible -subset of then is -neighborhood by-passed, for a compact smooth -manifold with . To see that, we note that if is the -triangulation of then there is a by-passed neighborhood (may not be equivariant) of in . We obtain the open -subpolyhedron:
[TABLE]
such that is a subset of by taking a -refinement of if necessary, where is a simplex of . Therefore, if is a path with endpoints in and outside then using Corollary 3.3.11 of [11] we deform out of .
Thus, if is a finite collection of closed smooth -submanifolds such that (thus each has codimension at least in so that can be by-passed in ), then () remains a by-passed -subset of using a finite collection of -subcomplex of such that is a -triangulation of , for .
The next lemma shows how the fixed points outside may be removed (see also [7]).
Lemma 2.1**.**
Let be a finite collection of closed -submanifolds of the -manifold such that and the action of outside is free, where is a finite group. Let be a -selfmap, be a non-empty closed locally contractible and by-passed -subset of such that , there are no fixed points of in , and has a finite number of fixed points in . Let and be two fixed points of that are -Nielsen equivalent from different orbits such that and or , where is the boundary of in and a path with end points and such that is homotopic to relative to the endpoints.
Then, is -homotopic, relative to , to a -selfmap such that .
**Proof of Lemma 2.1: ** Since is locally contractible and can be by-passed in , the discussion above shows that is -neighborhood by-passed in . Furthermore, can be by-passed in . Thus, the path is homotopic, relative to endpoints, to a path such that for , with . Since acts freely on and hence on , taking the -translates of yields paths from the orbit to the orbit . Note that the segements are disjoint while consists of distinct endpoints. Here, the isotropy subgroup at is trivial if . Now we coalesce these two fixed orbits in the same fashion as in [14, Lemma 3.1]. (For slightly more general spaces in which normal arcs are used, see [7, Theorem 2].)
We will prove Theorem 2.2 before Theorem 1.5 and for the same reason we prove Theorem 2.2 by first establishing Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 2.5.
Theorem 2.2**.**
Let be a compact Lie group, be a compact smooth -manifold and be a nonempty, closed, locally contractible -subset of such that for each finite we assume that , and is by-passed in , for all . Then, given a -map there exists a -map -homotopic to with if, and only if, the conditions and , given in Theorem 1.5, hold for relative to .
Lemma 2.3**.**
Let be a compact Lie group, be a -space -ANR and be a nonempty closed -subset of . If is a -map -homotopic to such that then the conditions and given by Theorem 1.5 hold for relative to .
Proof of Lemma 2.3: Let be a -homotopy which starts at and ends at . Then satisfies . If is a -essential fixed point class of , then, there exists a path such that and , where is a -essential fixed point class of , -related to and . In fact,
[TABLE]
So, is satisfied.
Lemma 2.3 shows that the conditions and are necessary for . The example below shows that these two conditions are independent of each other.
Example 2.4**.**
Let , and the action given by . Then, there is no -homotopy from the identity to such that . Note that occurs, because the map is the identity, but does not. On the other hand, let , and the action given by . Then, there is no -homotopy from the antipodal map to such that . This time holds because the map is fixed point free but does not hold.
Lemma 2.5**.**
Let be a compact Lie group, be a compact smooth -manifold and be a nonempty, closed, locally contractible -subset of such that for each finite we assume that , and is by-passed in , for all . If the conditions and , given in Theorem 1.5, hold for a -map relative to , then there exists a -map , -homotopic to with .
Proof of Lemma 2.5: This proof follows the steps of the proof of Theorem 3.2 of [9]. Consider a -map given by . It is possible to extend to a -homotopy {}_{1}\overline{H}_{1}:\Big{(}X\times\{0\}\Big{)}\cup\Big{(}(A\cup X_{1})\times I\Big{)}\rightarrow X. As commented above, there is a closed -invariant neighborhood of inside and retracts onto equivariantly. Note that acts freely on and is a -map. Hence, if has positive dimension we apply Lemma 3.3 of [12] and Lemma 2.1 of [6] to extend to a -homotopy , relative to . Moreover, has no fixed points in and , where .
On the other hand, if is a finite group then is a -polyhedron such that is a -subpolyhedron and is neighborhood by-passed in . We apply Lemma 3.1 of [12] and Lemma 2.1 to obtain a -homotopy which can be extended by Lemma 2.1 of [6] to a -homotopy , relative to , such that has no fixed points in and , where .
By induction, we may assume that we have a -map such that , where and the proof follows the steps we did for .
Now Theorem 2.2 follows easily from Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 2.5.
Proof of Theorem 1.5: First of all, by Theorem 2.2, there is a -map - homotopic to such that . We may apply Proposition 2.5 of [12] and Theorem 4.3 of [13] to conclude that is -homotopic to such that has a finite number of fixed points, all of which inside and lying in the interior of a maximal simplex of and is a -proximity map in (for some -triangulation of ).
Since has nonempty intersection with every component of we can pull the fixed points of to . Let be the -map of Lemma VIII.C.1 of [2] and the equivariant bounded distance in then we define
[TABLE]
given by:
[TABLE]
Then, we extend , relative to , to a -map . By Lemma 3.1 of [12], we eliminate the fixed points of inside . This finite set of fixed points can be removed because these fixed points lie in some non essential fixed point classes of since is fixed point free. Thus, the resulting -map is a -homotopy connecting to a -map such that .
3 Proof of Theorem 1.6 - An equivariant analogue of a theorem of Brown-Soderlund
Throughout this last section, will denote a finite group. Given a -fiber-preserving map of the total space of a -fiber bundle , it is known that the fixed point set of is related with the fixed point set of the induced map . However, there are equivariant homotopies that are not fiber-preserving as in the example below:
Example 3.1**.**
Let and and the action is given by . The -map , defined on by setting , is the start of the following equivariant homotopy:
[TABLE]
Then, is the fixed point set of where . Let be the projection, then is a -fiber bundle, is a fiber-preserving map and the induced map is the antipodal map. However, and is different from . So, is not a fiber preserving map and is not a fiber-preserving homotopy. In fact, cannot be realized as the fixed point set of any map equivariantly fiberwise homotopic to . To see that, we note that , where , consists of two disjoint -spheres . If is a fiber-preserving homotopy such that and , then is a homotopy on . Now, maps to and to . On the other hand, is fiber-preserving and is the fixed point of , it follows that the induced map fixes the circle pointwise. This implies that maps the (non-fixed) point to the point so that maps the equator of to that of , and vice versa. Thus maps to itself by interchangeing the two disjoint spheres . The images of under and contradict the continuity of . Hence such an equivariant fiber-preserving homotopy cannot exist.
The example above indicates the importance of modifying the conditions and and replacing them by and for the fiber-preserving map setting.
Lemma 3.2**.**
Let be a -fiber preserving map in the total space of the -fiber bundle , where , and are -spaces . Suppose that there is a -fiber preserving homotopy connecting a -fiber preserving map to such that for a nonempty and closed -subset of . Then the conditions and given in Theorem 1.6 hold for and .
The proof of Lemma 3.2 follows the steps of Lemma 2.3. Since is a -fiber bundle where , and are compact smooth -manifolds, we observe that is a -fibration and there is a -lift map such that , and , for all , where and .
Remark 3.3**.**
We should point out that Lemma 3.2 holds for any compact Lie group if we modify condition by only considering those ’s with .
The next proposition is an equivariant analogue of Theorem 2.1 of [1].
Proposition 3.4**.**
Let be a -map in the -fibration , where is a -ANR, is a closed -subset of , is a -metric pair and for all . Then can be extended to a -homotopy such that for all .
Proof of Proposition 3.4: Let a -extension of . Then is given by:
[TABLE]
Then define , where and is a -lift map.
Lemma 3.5**.**
Let be a -fiber bundle where and are compact and smooth -manifolds, , , for all , be a nonempty, closed, locally contractible -subset of such that be a closed -subset of and is by-passed in , for all , and a - fiber preserving map such that conditions and given in Theorem 1.6 hold for and .
Then there exists a -fiber-preserving map , -fiberwise homotopic to with and is a finite set.
Proof of Lemma 3.5: is a closed -subset of then the -fiber-preserving map given by induces a -map such that and the inclusion map.
Observe that we have almost the same conditions that we had in Theorem 1.5 except for . In this situation, suppose we have a -map . As commented in Lemma 2.5, it is possible to extend to a -map relative to .
Since is a finite group, is a - polyhedron such that is a -subpolyhedron of and is neighborhood by-passed in . Let be a -invariant neighborhood retract of . It follows from Lemma 3.1 of [12] and Lemma 2.1 that there exists of a -homotopy from to such that:
; 2. 2.
has a finite number of fixed points in ; 3. 3.
given a -fixed point class of such that then , where and is an essential -fixed point class of .
Then, the -map given by:
[TABLE]
extends a -homotopy to a -homotopy relative to and such that
[TABLE]
and is a essential -fixed point class of , for .
Observe that if for an essential -fixed point class of where , then we have a path such that:
[TABLE]
Hence, , for some and . However, this cannot occur because and is -invariant. By induction we extend the -map to a -homotopy with the properties above.
Note that defined by is such that
[TABLE]
Therefore, the lift of is a fiber-preserving -homotopy such that and . Thus,
[TABLE]
For each -orbit take the restriction of for , so has no essential fixed point classes. In fact, suppose that has an essential -fixed point class . Then, given we have lying inside an essential -fixed point class of . Thus, there exists a -fixed point class of which contains . But, is fiber-preserving -homotopic to , so, there exists an essential -fixed point class of -related to . Note that cannot be -related to . Consequently, is fiber-preserving -homotopic to fixed point free.
Consider the -map
[TABLE]
defined by:
[TABLE]
With Proposition 3.4 we extend to a fiber-preserving -homotopy and is such that . By , is fiber-preserving -homotopic to . Let such that and . Define given by:
[TABLE]
Applying Proposition 3.4 again we extend to a fiber-preserving - homotopy such that and is a finite set.
Lemma 3.6**.**
Let be a -fiber bundle pair, where , and are compact and smooth -manifolds, retracts equivariantly to a point and and , for all . Let be a closed and locally contractible -subset of such that is by-passed in , for all , be a nonempty, closed, locally contractible -subset of and be a -map such that , , intersects every essential -fixed point class of , for all .
Then for every closed -invariant subset of that intersects every component of and is -fiber bundle pair of there exists a fiber-preserving -map , -fiberwise homotopic to with .
Proof of Lemma 3.6: is -equivalent to a trivial -fibration , where is a projection in . So, there exists a - homeomorphism such that and . Define and note that:
[TABLE]
Therefore, and , for all .
retracts equivariantly to , so, there exists a -homotopy such that for each we have and . Then, define given by:
[TABLE]
Note that and . Then, is -homotopic to . Since we have, for each :
[TABLE]
Then, and because .
By hypothesis, intersects each essential -fixed point class of . So, intersects each essential -fixed point class of . So, intersects each essential -fixed point class of because:
[TABLE]
The -fiber bundle pair \Big{(}(A,Z),p,B,(Y_{0},\Omega)\Big{)} is such that intersects every component of because intersects every component of . Therefore, and hold for and . By Theorem 2.2 there exists a homotopy such that , and . Define a fiber-preserving -homotopy given by:
[TABLE]
Therefore, is -homotopic to and . Then, given by is a -homotopy such that and .
Proof of Theorem 1.6: With Lemma 3.5 we assume that:
; 2. 2.
is a finite set.
Let a restriction of , so . Using and the hypotheses of Lemma 3.6 are satisfied and there exists a fiber-preserving -homotopy from to such that .
Define by:
[TABLE]
With Proposition 3.4 there is a fiber-preserving -homotopy such that . Therefore, is such that and is fiber-preserving -homotopic to .
Corollary 3.7**.**
Let be a -fiber bundle where , and are compact and smooth -manifolds, , , for all , , , for all .
Let be a nonempty, closed, locally contractible -subset of such that is -fiber bundle pair with respect to the fiber bundle , be a closed -subset of such that each component of is equivariantly contractible and is by-passed in , for all . Let be a subbundle fiber of such that is a closed and locally contractible -subset of and is by-passed in , for all , and be a -fiber-preserving map such that intersects every essential -fixed point class of for at least one in each component , for all .
Then there exists a -fiber-preserving map , -fiberwise homotopic to with if, and only if, the following conditions holds for and :
there exists a -fiber-homotopy from to the inclusion ;
for every -essential fixed point class of there exists a path with , , and
Proof of Corollary 3.7: If the conditions hold then we apply Theorem 1.6 for . If there exists then by Lemma 3.2 and hold.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] G. Allaud and E. Fadell A Fiber Homotopy Extension Theorem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 104 (1962), 239-251.
- 2[2] R. F. Brown. The Lefschetz Fixed Point Theorem. Scott, Foresman and Co., Glenview, I 11., 1971.
- 3[3] R. Brown and C. Soderlund. Fixed point sets of fiber-preserving maps. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2 (2007), 41-53.
- 4[4] T. tom Dieck. Transformation Groups. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1987.
- 5[5] J. Dugundji. Topology. Boston, Allyn and Bacon, 1965.
- 6[6] E. Fadell and P. Wong. On deforming G 𝐺 G -maps to be fixed point free. Pacific J. Math. 132 (1988), 277-281.
- 7[7] T. N. Fomenko On The Least Number Of Fixed Points Of An Equivariant Map. Math. Notes 69, vol 1 (2001), 88-98.
- 8[8] S. Illman. Smooth equivariant triangulations of G 𝐺 G -manifolds for G 𝐺 G a finite group. Math. Ann. 233 (1978), 199-220.
