Teaching methods are erroneous: approaches which lead to erroneous end-user computing
M\'aria Csernoch, Piroska Bir\'o

TL;DR
This paper argues that current teaching methods in ICT and CS contribute to end-user errors in computing, emphasizing the need for pedagogical reform to align with human cognitive processes.
Contribution
It highlights the misalignment between teaching approaches and human cognition, proposing fundamental changes to improve end-user computing accuracy.
Findings
End-user errors are linked to teaching methods.
Teachers often misapply fast and slow thinking modes.
Reforming teaching approaches can reduce errors.
Abstract
If spreadsheets are not erroneous then who, or what, is? Research has found that end-users are. If end-users are erroneous then why are they? Research has found that responsibility lies with human beings' fast and slow thinking modes and the inappropriate way they use them. If we are aware of this peculiarity of human thinking, then why do we not teach students how to train their brains? This is the main problem, this is the weakest link in the process: teaching. We have to make teachers realize that end-users are erroneous because of the erroneous teaching approaches to end-user computing. The proportion of fast and slow thinking modes is not constant, and teachers are mistaken when they apply the same proportion in both the teaching and end-user roles. Teachers should believe in the incremental nature of science and have high self-efficacy to make students understand and appreciate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpreadsheets and End-User Computing · Educational Games and Gamification
