Magnetoelectric Phase Diagrams of Multiferroic GdMn2O5
S. H. Bukhari, Th. Kain, M. Schiebl, A. Shuvaev, Anna Pimenov, A. M., Kuzmenko, X. Wang, S.-W.Cheong, J. Ahmad, A. Pimenov

TL;DR
This study maps the magnetoelectric phase diagrams of GdMn2O5, revealing strong field-dependent phase transitions and supporting a model with two ferroelectric sublattices influenced by R-Mn interactions.
Contribution
First detailed field-temperature phase diagrams of GdMn2O5, demonstrating the strong magnetoelectric coupling and phase transitions related to magnetic field orientation and strength.
Findings
Dielectric permittivity highly sensitive to phase boundaries
Multiple field-dependent phase transitions observed
Phase diagram aligns with polarization changes due to Gd magnetic moments rotation
Abstract
Electric and magnetic properties of multiferroic GdMn2O5 in external magnetic fields were investigated to map out the magnetoelectric phases in this material. Due to strong magnetoelectric coupling, the dielectric permittivity is highly sensitive to phase boundaries in GdMn2O5, which allowed to construct the field-temperature phase diagrams. Several phase transitions are observed which are strongly field-dependent with respect to field orientation and strength. The phase diagram for a magnetic field along the crystallographic a-axis corresponds well to a polarization step, as induced by 90 degree rotation of Gd magnetic moments. Our results support the model of two ferroelectric sublattices, Mn-Mn and Gd-Mn with strong R-Mn (4f-3d) interaction for the polarization in RMn2O5.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Magnetoelectric Phase Diagrams of Multiferroic
S. H. Bukhari
Department of Physics, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
Institute of Solid State Physics, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria
Th. Kain
M. Schiebl
A. Shuvaev
Anna Pimenov
Institute of Solid State Physics, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria
A. M. Kuzmenko
Prokhorov General Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
X. Wang
University of Science and Technology, Beijing, China
Rutgers Center for Emergent Materials and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Jersey 08854, USA
S.-W.Cheong
Rutgers Center for Emergent Materials and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Jersey 08854, USA
J. Ahmad
Department of Physics, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
A. Pimenov
Institute of Solid State Physics, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria
Abstract
Electric and magnetic properties of multiferroic in external magnetic fields were investigated to map out the magnetoelectric phases in this material. Due to strong magnetoelectric coupling, the dielectric permittivity is highly sensitive to phase boundaries in , which allowed to construct the field-temperature phase diagrams. Several phase transitions are observed which are strongly field-dependent with respect to field orientation and strength. The phase diagram for a magnetic field along the crystallographic -axis corresponds well to a polarization step, as induced by 90*∘* rotation of Gd magnetic moments. Our results support the model of two ferroelectric sublattices, Mn-Mn and Gd-Mn with strong -Mn (-) interaction for the polarization in .
pacs:
75.85.+t, 77.22.Ch, 75.25.-j
I Introduction
Multiferroics are materials in which magnetic and electric orders coexist and which are promising for the development of novel functional materials and devices Fiebig (2005); Eerenstein et al. (2006); Tokura (2007); Ramesh and Spaldin (2007). The coupling between the magnetic and electric degrees of freedom has the consequence that multiferroics exhibit new physical effects: electric and magnetic orders can be modified by external magnetic or electric fields and the propagation of electromagnetic radiation can be controlled.
Recently, the observation of large polarization Lee et al. (2013) in and of colossal magnetoelectric effect in and had a significant impact in the field of multiferroics Hur et al. (2004a, b). Rare-earth multiferroic manganites, received much attention because of large ferroelectric polarization, puzzling magnetic structure and strong coupling between magnetic and ferroelectric orders Lee et al. (2013); Hur et al. (2004a, b), as compared to other multiferroics such as Goto et al. (2004); Prokhnenko et al. (2007), Park et al. (2007), and Taniguchi et al. (2006); Niermann et al. (2014). Because of the complex magnetic interactions and spin-lattice coupling, our current understanding of the underlying physics in still needs considerable efforts Ratcliff et al. (2005); dela Cruz et al. (2007).
has an orthorhombic crystal structure with Pbam space group at room temperatureBertaut et al. (1965); Abrahams and Bernstein (1967) as exemplified in Fig. 1 for . The complex magnetism in this system originates from the magnetic moments of Mn3+, Mn4+ and from the magnetic moment of . There exist five relevant magnetic interactions between neighbouring spins, which makes the system highly frustrated and gives rise to various magnetically-ordered phases with long-period modulation wavelength Noda et al. (2008). Due to inherent magnetic frustration below the Néel temperature K, shows a cascade of successive phase transitions upon temperature variation. In most members of the family, common phase transitions occur below , such as the high temperature incommensurate magnetic (HT-ICM) phase characterized by wave vector q = (qx,0,qz), and a lock-in transition from HT-ICM to the commensurate magnetic (CM) phase with q = (1/2,0,1/4), where ferroelectric polarization arises. On further cooling, the CM phase is destroyed and a new low temperature incommensurate (LT-ICM) phase may emerge. Moreover, in some cases, another phase appears between the HT-ICM and CM, known as the one-dimensional incommensurate (1D-ICM) phase Noda et al. (2008).
The magnetic structure of is slightly different from other members of the family. Lee et al. show Lee et al. (2013) that an incommensurate phase occurs below 40 K with a wave vector , followed by a commensurate phase with below K, which does not change further at low temperatures. This sequence of the wave vectors is due to the active involvement of Gd ions below K because of their large atomic radius and high magnetic moments. This structure leads to tunable ferroelectricity in in external magnetic fields Popov et al. (2003); Kadomtseva et al. (2006), inducing a giant change of polarization by /, the largest among the known multiferroic systems Lee et al. (2013). Recently, pressure-induced change in the polarization at the ferroelectric transition in has been observed and attributed to Gd-Mn decoupling at high pressure due to lattice contraction Poudel et al. (2015); Yin et al. (2016).
In multiferroics, there exists strong coupling between electric polarization and magnetic order. The polarization can be induced by an applied magnetic field in and DyMn2O5 Higashiyama et al. (2005, 2004); Hur et al. (2004b), suppressed in Higashiyama et al. (2005), reversed in Hur et al. (2004a) and Lee et al. (2013) or flopped in Fukunaga et al. (2009) and Fukunaga et al. (2011). These effects are observed in the low-temperature magnetically-ordered phases. Recently, the magnetic field effect on the electric polarization has been demonstrated in the NdMn2O5 multiferroic Chattopadhyay et al. (2016).
In , the dielectric response in the external magnetic field depends strongly on the type of rare-earth and the direction of applied field. It has been found that magnetic fields affect the low temperature region (below K), leading to remarkable magnetoelectric response. It indicates the key role of the moments of the rare-earth ions in interaction with the external field which exists even at higher temperatures.
In this work, we present a set of dielectric properties along the crystallographic axes and and in external magnetic fields. From the observed dielectric anomalies, we construct the magnetoelectric phase diagrams of . Taking into account the results of previous studies, an assignment of various phases is suggested.
II Experimental
Dielectric and magnetic properties of single crystalline have been measured in magnetic fields up to 12 T and at temperatures between 2 K and 60 K using the Physical Property Measurement System. The system was supplemented by the vibrating magnetometer and by the Alpha impedance analyzer to measure the complex dielectric permittivity . Dielectric results shown originate from measurements at fixed frequency of 10 kHz.
The single crystal of was grown by using the flux method Lee et al. (2013); Hur et al. (2004a), similar to other compounds. After determining the orientation of axes by Laue diffraction, it was cut into plane-parallel slices of area mm2 and thickness 0.5 mm normal to the crystallographic -axis. To obtain samples of other orientations, the slice dedicated for dielectric experiments was cut into several rectangular pieces parallel to the and axes. Dielectric experiments on samples with ac electric field were performed on mosaic samples assembled from about 5 such fragments and fixed with G-varnish. Spontaneous electric polarization has been measured on a small crystal of about mm3 in size. To obtain initial information on the characteristic temperatures and magnetic fields in , additional dielectric experiments were carried out using polycrystalline samples. Electric contacts to the samples were produced using silver paste. The temperature scans of dielectric permittivity between 2 and 60 K were done under several fixed magnetic fields , up to 12 T. Sweeping the magnetic field at selected temperatures provided additional information to complete the magnetoelectric phase diagrams.
In dielectric and magnetoelectric experiments, it is important to take care of possible artefacts due to conductivity Lunkenheimer et al. (2002) and magnetoresistance Catalan (2006); Schmidt et al. (2012) in the sample. In order to exclude such effects, several test experiments at different frequencies were carried out. We found that the real part of the dielectric permittivity, , measured at frequencies of 1 kHz, 10 kHz, and 100 kHz agree to each other within few percent. In addition, the imaginary part of the permittivity, , does not exceed in all experiments below K. We believe that these tests exclude extrinsic conducting effects in our measurements. Such effects could indeed be observed at temperatures above 100 K as increase of and as increasing by factor of three.
III Results
Fig. 2 shows the temperature dependence of the dielectric permittivity along the and axes in a range of magnetic fields (0-12 T), parallel to all three axes. The upper panels show the experiments in zero magnetic field on a small crystal. The lower panels show the results of the experiments in external magnetic field on a mosaic sample. The sample holder for external fields did not allow the absolute measurements due to a large stray signal. On cooling from the paramagnetic state, the dielectric permittivity starts to increase below K in zero magnetic field, which is the onset of long range incommensurate antiferromagnetic (ICM) order at 39 K. By further cooling, exhibits a kink at K and a peak at K where the static polarization Lee et al. (2013); Poudel et al. (2015) along the -axis () appears (see Fig. 3). This ferroelectric state for coincides with a commensurate magnetic order Lee et al. (2013) with . In contrast to other , reveals two close ferroelectric transitions at and , respectively.
Near K, the dielectric permittivity exhibits a divergent behavior identifying another ferroelectric phase transition accompanied by a rapid growth of . Additionally, a small anomaly at low temperatures appears at K. Since this temperature closely coincides with a maximum of the magnetic susceptibility along the -axis (see Fig. 6), we attribute this anomaly to Gd ordering transition Popov et al. (2003); Lee et al. (2013); Tachibana et al. (2005).
For several other members of the family, the main ferroelectric peak is nearly independent of the applied field Hur et al. (2004b); Higashiyama et al. (2005). One of the interesting consequences of external magnetic fields in is the transformation of the kink at into a well pronounced peak which further moves towards higher temperatures with increasing magnetic field 3 T. In addition, the sharp peak at decreases rapidly and moves towards lower temperatures with increasing and fully vanishes at 6 T. In the geometry , a new peak appears in the low temperature range at 20 K, above 6 T. This temperature separates two ferroelectric phases assigned as FE1 and FE5 (see Fig. 4).
Applying magnetic fields along the and axes, qualitatively similar dependencies are observed (Fig. 2), except for substantially higher absolute values of the characteristic fields at the phase transitions. This agrees well with the fact that the -axis is the easy magnetic axis.
The results of the static polarization experiments on a small crystal are shown in Fig. 3. The left panel of Fig. 3 shows the data for the zero magnetic field and it demonstrates that static polarization in can be seen solely along the -axis in the zero magnetic field. We note that spontaneous polarization shows a well-defined step and substantial hysteresis at . Both features are indications of the first-order transition in . As may be expected from the results of dielectric experiments, several additional phase transitions are observed in electric polarization of in external magnetic fields. The splitting of the ferroelectric transition at K is visible as complex behavior of the polarization around this temperature. In high magnetic fields (middle panel) , the saturation tendency of below is interrupted close to K and an additional contribution to the polarization starts to grow. As a result, the low-temperature polarization in reaches . As will be discussed below, we attribute an additional contribution to the influence of Mn-Gd interactions.
Another interesting result of the polarization experiments is the appearance of a sharp step-like feature in at 5 K in the field range of 4.5-5.5 T which is marked by arrows in the middle and right panels of Fig. 3. This feature is accompanied by a peak in the dielectric permittivity at the same temperature. The behavior of electric polarization around may be a hint for a possible partial polarization flop from the axis to the or axes. Similar polarization flop occurring at K in external magnetic fields have been observed earlier in [Fukunaga et al., 2011] and in TmMn2O5 [Fukunaga et al., 2009]. However, in the present experiments no spontaneous polarization along the or axes could be observed within the experimental accuracy.
Magnetoelectric phase diagrams
Summarizing our experimental results on electric and magnetic properties of , we show the magnetoelectric phase diagrams for external magnetic fields along the , , and axes, as shown in Fig. 4. The two phase boundaries defined by and in the phase diagram, are similar for external magnetic fields along all axes. These phase boundaries correspond to the phase transitions PM/PE ICM/PE at and ICM/PE CM/FE1 at . The phase boundaries of and show a strong hysteresis effect indicating the first-order transition Higashiyama et al. (2005).
To support the determination of the phase boundaries, magnetic field scans of the dielectric permittivity below 40 K and in the fields up to T were performed and are shown in Fig. 5. For and (top left), in varying fields and at low temperatures 10 K, an anomaly has been identified around 3 T, which coincides with the phase boundary drawn from temperature scans. With increasing fields up to 6 T (top right), a clear jump-like anomaly is evident below K, which coincides with the Gd spin-flop transition Lee et al. (2013). This phase boundary is only weakly temperature-dependent and, therefore, it has not been observed in fixed-field scans. For and (bottom right), strong anomalies of around 11 T have been detected, which corresponds to the same phase boundary in the geometry.
In the case of , the boundary at between the FE2 and FE1 phases smoothly transforms to the FE2/FE5 phase boundary around 5.5 T. At low temperatures ( K), additional structure is seen in several magnetic field-dependent experiments. Because this temperature range corresponds to an ordered state of the Gd spins, a possible explanation for additional boundaries may be a reorientation of the Gd sublattice. As mentioned above, a clear peak in has been observed at this boundary.
We recall that in magnetic field-dependent experiments (Fig. 5), several step-like features have been observed in . According to the sum rule for the static dielectric permittivity Dressel and Grüner (2002), an electrically dipole-active excitation may then be suggested to exist at high frequencies. Similar to electromagnons in several multiferroics Shuvaev et al. (2010); Sushkov et al. (2014), a step in the dielectric permittivity may directly correspond to a change in dielectric contribution of a high-frequency mode.
In order to complete the magnetoelectric phase diagram, magnetization measurements in have been carried out in several magnetic fields along the -axis, as shown in Fig. 6. The paramagnetic susceptibility above K approximately follows the Curie-Weiss law with around 25 K. The Néel transition temperature is seen in the magnetization data after subtraction of a smooth function of temperature, which is shown in the insets of Fig. 6. One prominent feature in the low-field magnetization is a broad maximum around K which is attributed to the ordering of the Gd subsystem. A step-like feature at T and around 8 K probably corresponds to the spin-flop transition of Gd-ions. This transition is clearly seen in the field-dependent magnetization curves until K (not shown), suggesting the existence of Gd-order in both high-field phases, FE1 and FE5.
The phase diagrams for and exhibit similar phase sequences as observed for , despite of the difference in absolute values of critical fields. Therefore, we suggest that fundamental physics in the different phases (FE1 FE5) is the same in all phase diagrams.
IV Discussion
The series of the magnetoelectric transitions presented here is in agreement with previous experiments in [Lee et al., 2013; Poudel et al., 2015; Yin et al., 2016]. Figure 7 reproduces the main features of the phase diagram in Fig. 4 (for ) and of the field-dependent polarization given in Fig. 3. The polarization data are given as color scale and they fit well in the magnetoelectric phase diagram.
Following the arguments of Lee et al., Ref. [Lee et al., 2013], the boundary around 5.5 T between the FE2 and FE5 phases corresponds to a switching of additional mechanisms of electric polarization in . The total electric polarization may be obtained as a competition of two contributions originating from the symmetric exchange-striction mechanism in Mn-Mn and Mn-Gd spin-subsystems, respectively. In magnetic fields exceeding T, the Gd spins rotate by leading to the inversion of the Mn-Gd contribution to electric polarization. As a result, the total polarization in the right panel of Fig. 3 increases from (FE2,3) to about .
Magnetic field dependence of the electric polarization in Fig. 3 is rather complex. Remarkable is a sharp decrease of in at fields T, which is followed by a step-like increase for further increasing fields. Conversely, in previous experiments Lee et al. (2013) only a decrease of electric polarization has been observed reaching even negative values and remaining stable until T. Most probably, the complex magnetic structure of is sensitive to the exact orientation of the external field and to details of cooling and poling procedures. Further investigations are necessary to resolve this problem.
V Conclusions
Magnetodielectric effects for single crystalline have been investigated with dielectric spectroscopy, electric polarizations, and magnetic experiments. Several phase transitions are observed which are strongly field-dependent with respect to field orientation and strength. A full set of magnetoelectric phase diagrams in external magnetic fields has been determined. Qualitative similarity of the phase diagrams suggests that the same sequence of magnetoelectric phases exists for all geometries in .
Acknowledgements
S. H. Bukhari acknowledges financial support by the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan through a IRSIP scholarship. This work was supported by the Austrian Science Funds (I815-N16, I1648-N27, W1243). The work at Rutgers University was supported by the DOE under Grant No. DOE: DE-FG02-07ER46382.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Fiebig (2005) M. Fiebig, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 , R 123 (2005), URL http://stacks.iop.org/0022-3727/38/R 123 .
- 2Eerenstein et al. (2006) W. Eerenstein, N. D. Mathur, and J. F. Scott, Nature 442 , 759 (2006), URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature 05023 . · doi ↗
- 3Tokura (2007) Y. Tokura, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 310 , 1145 (2007), URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S 030488530602556 X .
- 4Ramesh and Spaldin (2007) R. Ramesh and N. A. Spaldin, Nat. Mater. 6 , 21 (2007), URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat 1805 . · doi ↗
- 5Lee et al. (2013) N. Lee, C. Vecchini, Y. J. Choi, L. C. Chapon, A. Bombardi, P. G. Radaelli, and S.-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 , 137203 (2013), URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Phys Rev Lett.110.137203 .
- 6Hur et al. (2004 a) N. Hur, S. Park, P. A. Sharma, J. S. Ahn, S. Guha, and S.-W. Cheong, Nature 429 , 392 (2004 a), URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature 02572 . · doi ↗
- 7Hur et al. (2004 b) N. Hur, S. Park, P. A. Sharma, S. Guha, and S.-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 , 107207 (2004 b), URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Phys Rev Lett.93.107207 .
- 8Goto et al. (2004) T. Goto, T. Kimura, G. Lawes, A. P. Ramirez, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 , 257201 (2004), URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Phys Rev Lett.92.257201 .
