On the representation dimension and finitistic dimension of special multiserial algebras
Sibylle Schroll

TL;DR
This paper proves that all special multiserial algebras have a representation dimension at most three, confirming the finitistic dimension conjecture for this class by constructing radical embeddings into finite type algebras.
Contribution
It establishes a bound on the representation dimension of monomial and self-injective special multiserial algebras and confirms the finitistic dimension conjecture for all special multiserial algebras.
Findings
Representation dimension ≤ 3 for monomial and self-injective special multiserial algebras
Construction of radical embeddings into finite representation type algebras
Finitistic dimension conjecture holds for all special multiserial algebras
Abstract
For monomial special multiserial algebras, which in general are of wild representation type, we construct radical embeddings into algebras of finite representation type. As a consequence, we show that the representation dimension of monomial and self-injective special multiserial algebras is less or equal to three. This implies that the finitistic dimension conjecture holds for all special multiserial algebras.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
On the representation dimension and finitistic dimension of special multiserial algebras
Sibylle Schroll
Department of Mathematics, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom.
Abstract.
For monomial special multiserial algebras, which in general are of wild representation type, we construct radical embeddings into algebras of finite representation type. As a consequence, we show that the representation dimension of monomial and self-injective special multiserial algebras is less than or equal to three. This implies that the finitistic dimension conjecture holds for all special multiserial algebras.
Key words and phrases:
representation dimension, radical embedding, splitting daturm, special multiserial algebra
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
16G10, 05E10
Part of this work took place during a visit of the author to the University of São Paulo: the author would like to thank Eduardo Marcos for his hospitality. This work was supported through the EPSRC fellowship grant EP/P016294/1.
Introduction
Many of the important open conjectures in representation theory of Artin algebras are of a homological nature, such as the finitistic dimension conjecture, Nunke’s condition and Nakayma’s conjectures. Amongst these conjectures there is a logical hierarchy, in that if the finitistic dimension conjecture holds then Nunke’s condition holds which in turn implies the Nakayama conjectures; for an overview, see, for example [8, 11, 14].
The finitistic dimension conjecture states that for any Artin algebra , the supremum of the projective dimensions of the finitely generated right -modules of finite projective dimension is finite. This conjecture was originally posed as a question by Rosenberg and Zelinsky and then published by Bass in 1960 [1].
Although the finitistic dimension conjecture is open in general, there has been much related work in recent years reducing the problem to simpler classes of algebras [12, 13]. There are many classes of algebras where the conjecture has been shown to hold [2, 9]. For classes of algebras of mostly wild representation type, the two most prominent examples where the finitistic dimension conjecture is known to hold are the monomial algebras [3, 10] and the radical cubed zero algebras [7].
In this paper, we will show that the finitistic dimension conjecture holds for special multiserial algebras, a large class of mostly wild algebras, containing many other important and well-studied classes of algebras such as, for example, special biserial algebras, symmetric radical cubed zero algebras and almost gentle algebras [4, 5].
It is well known that most finite dimensional algebras are of wild representation type implying that their representation theory is at least as complicated as the representation theory of the free associative algebra in two variables. Special multiserial algebras form a class of mostly wild finite dimensional algebras. It was shown in [4] that the radical of their indecomposable modules is a sum of uniserial modules whose pairwise intersection is either a simple module or zero. This is an indication that uniserial modules play an important role in the study of their representation theory. In this paper, we show that for a monomial special multiserial algebra of infinite representation type, the direct sum of all uniserial submodules of gives rise to an Auslander generator of .
In order to show this, we construct radical embeddings from monomial special multiserial algebras to a direct product of representation finite string algebras whose quivers are linearly oriented Dynkin diagrams of type and cyclically oriented Dynkin diagrams of type . Therefore by [2] we obtain that the representation dimension of a monomial special multiserial algebra is less or equal to three.
We further show that for any special multiserial algebra , a relation is either monomial or is a linear combination of elements in the socle of . We then apply the results in [2] in combination with our results on monomial special multiserial algebras, to show that the representation dimension of self-injective special multiserial algebras is less or equal to three.
To summarise, in this paper we show the following:
Theorem 1**.**
Let be a monomial special multiserial algebra. Then there exists a radical embedding where is an algebra of finite representation type.
Corollary 2**.**
Let be a monomial special multiserial algebra. Then .
In [6] Brauer configuration algebras are defined as generalisations of Brauer graph algebras. Brauer configuration algebras are symmetric algebras, so in particular they are self-injective and it follows from the next result that their representation dimension is less or equal to 3.
Corollary 3**.**
Let be a self-injective special multiserial algebras. Then . In particular, the representation dimension of a Brauer configuration algebra is less or equal to .
Corollary 4**.**
Let be a special multiserial algebra. Then the finitistic dimension of is finite.
Acknowledgements: I would like to thank Ed Green for the many wonderful hours we have spent talking mathematics. In particular, I would like to thank him, Karin Erdmann and Jan Geuenich for the discussions involving the results of this paper. I also would like to thank Julian Külshammer for alerting me to a mistake in an earlier version of the paper.
1. Background
Let be an algebraically closed field. A quiver consists of a finite set of vertices , a finite set of arrows and maps where, for , denotes the vertex at which starts and denotes the vertex at which ends. For , such that , we write for the element in given by the concatenation of and . For , denote by the associated idempotent. We call an element uniform if there exists such that . All modules considered are finitely generated right modules and for a finite dimensional -algebra, we denote by the category of finitely generated right -modules. Furthermore, set and denote by the Jacobson radical of . We call a finite dimensional -algebra basic, if for an admissible ideal in .
From now on, whenever we write , we assume that is admissible.
Recall that and that is a generator-cogenerator of if where is the subcategory of generated by direct sums of direct summands of . Then
[TABLE]
Moreover, is an Auslander generator of if . The finitistic dimension of is given by
[TABLE]
Let , we say that condition (S) holds for if the following holds:
(S) For all there exists at most one arrow such that and there exists at most one arrow such that .
Definition 5**.**
A finite dimensional algebra is special multiserial if it is Morita equivalent to an algebra such that (S) holds. **
We recall the following results and definitions from [2]. For , set to be the subset of consisting of arrows starting at and set to be the set of arrows of ending at . Note that if there is a loop at then .
Suppose and are disjoint unions. The collection is a splitting datum at (for ) if
- (1)
, for all and with , 2. (2)
where is a set of relations of the form such that none of the are in or none of the are in and such that none of the are in or none of the are in .
An algebra is called monomial if is monomial, that is if is generated by paths. Remark that condition (2) always holds if is monomial.
Let be a splitting datum at . Then we define a new quiver
[TABLE]
by setting
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
The map is given by
[TABLE]
The map is given by
[TABLE]
We define for where
[TABLE]
A radical embedding is an algebra monomorphism such that . It is shown in [2] that a splitting datum gives rise to a radical embedding.
Proposition 6**.**
[2]** Let with admissible. Let be a splitting datum at some vertex of . Then there exists a radical embedding .
Also recall the following results from [2].
Theorem 7**.**
[2]** Let and be basic algebras.
- (1)
If is a radical embedding with a representation finite algebra then . 2. (2)
Let be an indecomposable projective-injective -module and set . Then if .
2. Some results on special multiserial algebras
In the following proposition we show that the relations in a special multiserial algebra are of a particular form.
Proposition 8**.**
Let be a special multiserial algebra with satisfying condition (S). Let be uniform with such that almost all and where each is a path in . Then either is a path or for all , is in the socle of as a right and left -module.
Proof.
We will start by showing that the result holds when considering the socle of as a right -module. Suppose there exists a unique , then .
Suppose that with . Then without loss of generality we can assume that .
Now suppose that and that . Then there exists such that but since , and this a contradiction. Suppose now that . Then there exist such that . Since , by condition (S) we have . Therefore if and for then . This implies by condition (S) that and hence . Moreover, . Now let and which implies that and . Continuing in this way, we see that .
Suppose now that and suppose that and . Then there exists such that and therefore there exists with and . Since is special, this implies . Inductively it then follows that for any such that and using that is special it follows that .
Note that we have only used specialness on the right side. Using specialness on the left side, we obtain the result for the socle of as a left -module. ∎
The following follows directly from condition (S).
Lemma 9**.**
Let be monomial special multiserial and let be a splitting datum at some vertex in .
- (1)
Suppose that , for . Then consists of the unique arrow such that if such an arrow exists, otherwise is empty. 2. (2)
Suppose that , for then where is the unique arrow such that if such an arrow exits and is empty otherwise.
Moreover, for as in (1) or (2) above, is monomial special multiserial.
3. Proof of Theorem 1
We show that for any monomial special multiserial algebra there is a radical embedding of into a disjoint union of representation finite string algebras whose underlying quiver is either a linearly oriented quiver of type and or a cyclically oriented quiver of type .
Proof of Theorem 1 and Corollary 2: Let be a monomial special multiserial algebra such that is generated by paths. Define .
If then is a disjoint union of quivers where each quiver is either a linearly oriented quiver of type or a cyclically oriented quiver of type . So is a product of representation finite string algebras, and it therefore is of finite representation type.
Suppose that . Let such that or . Suppose that with . Set
[TABLE]
Note that consists of the unique arrow such that if such an arrow exists. That is a splitting datum at follows directly (S) and from the fact that is monomial.
By Lemma 9, is again a monomial special multiserial algebra and .
We treat the case in a similar way.
Repeating this a finite number of times and setting and , we obtain by Proposition 6 a sequence of radical embeddings such that is a string algebra with and is therefore representation finite. Then it follows from Theorem 7 (1) that .
Let be the radical embedding constructed in the proof of Theorem 1 above. By the proof of Theorem 1.1 in [2] an Auslander generator of is given by where is the direct sum of isomorphism class representatives of the indecomposable -modules considered as -modules. Therefore in the case of a monomial special multiserial algebra is given by the direct sum of all uniserial submodules of .
Proof of Corollary 3: Since is self-injective, every projective is injective. Applying Proposition 8 we obtain that iteratively factoring out the socles of the projective injective indecomposable modules gives rise to a monomial special multiserial algebra. Thus the result follows from Theorem 1 and by the successive application of Theorem 7 (2).
Proof of Corollary 4: It follows from Proposition 8 that is a monomial special multiserial algebra and the result follows from [13, 4.3] and Theorem 1.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] H. Bass, Finitistic dimension and a homological generalization of semiprimary rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 95 (1960) 466–488.
- 2[2] K. Erdmann, T. Holm, O. Iyama, J. Schröer, Radical embeddings and representation dimension, Adv. Math. 185 (2004), 159–177.
- 3[3] E. L. Green, E. Kirkman and J. Kuzmanovich, Finitistic dimensions of finite dimensional monomial algebras, J. Algebra 136 (1991), 37–50.
- 4[4] E. L. Green. Edward, S. Schroll, Multiserial and special multiserial algebras and their representations. Adv. Math. 302 (2016), 1111–1136.
- 5[5] E. L. Green. Edward, S. Schroll, Almost gentle algebras and their trivial extensions, ar Xiv:1603.03587.
- 6[6] E. L. Green. Edward, S. Schroll, Brauer configuration algebras, Bull. Sci. Math. 141 (2017) no. 6, 539–572.
- 7[7] E. L. Green and B. Zimmermann-Huisgen, Finitistic dimension of artinian rings with vanishing radical cube, Math. Z. 206 (1991) 505–526.
- 8[8] D. Happel, Homological conjectures in representation theory of finite-dimensional algebras, Unpublished note.
