Asymptotic behavior of metric spaces at infinity
Viktoriia Bilet, Oleksiy Dovgoshey

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new sequential method to analyze the structure of metric spaces at infinity, providing criteria for their finiteness and boundedness.
Contribution
It proposes a novel sequential approach to study the asymptotic structure of metric spaces and establishes criteria for their finiteness and boundedness at infinity.
Findings
Criteria for finiteness at infinity
Criteria for boundedness at infinity
Introduction of a sequential analysis approach
Abstract
A new sequential approach to investigations of structure of metric spaces at infinity is proposed. Criteria for finiteness and boundedness of metric spaces at infinity are found.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
UDK 515.124
MATHEMATICS
Institute of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics NAS of Ukraine, Dobrovolskogo Str. 1, Sloviansk, 84100, Ukraine; Phone: +38(0626)66 55 00
Emails: [email protected], [email protected]
Asymptotic behavior of metric spaces at infinity
Viktoriia Bilet, Oleksiy Dovgoshey
A new sequential approach to investigations of structure of metric spaces at infinity is proposed. Criteria for finiteness and boundedness of metric spaces at infinity are found.
Keywords: asymptotic boundedness of metric space, asymptotic finiteness of metric space, convergence of metric spaces, strong porosity at a point.
1 Introduction
Under the asymptotic structure describing the behavior of an unbounded metric space at infinity we mean a metric space that is a limit of rescaling metric spaces for tending to infinity. The Gromov–Hausdorff convergence and the asymptotic cones are most often used for construction of such limits. Both of these approaches are based on higher-order logic abstractions (see, for example, [1] for details), which makes them very powerful, but it does away the constructiveness. In this paper we propose a more elementary, sequential approach for describing the structure of unbounded metric spaces at infinity.
Let be an unbounded metric space, be a point of and be a scaling sequence of positive real numbers tending to infinity. Denote by the set of all sequences for each of which and there is a finite limit . Define the equivalence relation on as
[TABLE]
Let be the set of equivalence classes generated by on . We shall say that points are mutually stable if for and there is a limit
[TABLE]
Let us consider the weighted graph with the vertex set , and the edge set such that
[TABLE]
and the weight defined by formula (1.1).
Definition 1.1**.**
The pretangent spaces (to at infinity w.r.t. ) are the maximal cliques of with metrics determined with the help of (1.1).
Recall that a clique in a graph is a set such that every two distinct points of are adjacent. A clique in is maximal if implies for every clique in .
Define the subset of the set by the rule:
[TABLE]
Then is a common point of all pretangent spaces . It means in particular that the graph is connected.
Let be infinite and strictly increasing. Denote by the subsequence of the and, for every , write . It is clear that and for every . Moreover, if and exists, then
[TABLE]
Let us define and similarly to and, respectively, and let , be the natural projections , and let for all . Then there is an embedding of the weighted graph in the weighted graph such that the diagram
[TABLE]
is commutative. Since is an embedding of weighted graphs, is a clique in if is a clique in . Furthermore, (1.3) implies that the restrictions are isometries of the pretangent spaces on the metric spaces .
Definition 1.2**.**
A pretangent space is tangent if the clique is maximal for every infinite, strictly increasing sequence .
Example 1.3**.**
Let be a finite-dimensional Euclidean space and let such that the Hausdorff distance is finite. Then for every scaling sequence all pretangent spaces are tangent and isometric to .
In conclusion of this brief introduction it should be noted that there exist other techniques which allow to investigate the asymptotic properties of metric spaces at infinity. As examples, we mention only the balleans theory [2] and the Wijsman convergence [3], [4], [5].
2 Finiteness
In this section we study the conditions under which pretangent spaces are finite.
Theorem 2.1**.**
Let be an unbounded metric space, , and let
[TABLE]
Then the inequality holds for every pretangent space if and only if
Note that, for every unbounded metric space , there is a pretangent space consisting at least two points.
Corollary 2.2**.**
Let be an unbounded metric space and let be a point defined by (1.2) for every scaling sequence Then the following statements are equivalent.
- (i)
The graph is a star with the center for every scaling sequence ; 2. (ii)
The limit relation holds.
Let us consider now the problem of existence of finite tangent spaces.
Definition 2.3**.**
Let . The porosity of at infinity is the quantity
[TABLE]
where is the length of the longest interval in the set The set is strongly porous at infinity if .
The standard definition of the porosity at a point can be found in [6].
For a metric space and write .
Theorem 2.4**.**
Let be an unbounded metric space, The following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
The set is strongly porous at infinity; 2. (ii)
There is a single-point tangent space ; 3. (iii)
There is a finite tangent space ; 4. (iv)
There is a compact tangent space ; 5. (v)
There is a bounded, separable tangent space .
Some results which are similar to Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.4 can be found in [7] and [8] respectively.
3 Boundedness
Let . We shall say that is eventually increasing if the inequality holds for sufficiently large . For write for the set of eventually increasing sequences with . Denote also by the set of all sequences of open intervals meeting the following conditions:
Each is a connected component of the set
is eventually increasing;
and .
Define an equivalence on the set of sequences of strictly positive numbers as follows. Let and . Then if there are some constants such that for every .
Definition 3.1**.**
Let and let . The set is -strongly porous at infinity if there is a sequence such that where . The set is completely strongly porous at infinity if is -strongly porous at infinity for every .
Note that every completely strongly porous at infinity set is strongly porous at infinity but not conversely.
Definition 3.2**.**
Let be an unbounded metric space and let . A scaling sequence is normal if is eventually increasing and there is such that
[TABLE]
Write for the set of all pretangent spaces with normal scaling sequences . Under what conditions the family is uniformly bounded?
Recall that a family of a metric spaces is uniformly bounded if
[TABLE]
If all metric spaces are pointed with marked points and
[TABLE]
then we say that is uniformly discrete (w.r.t. the points ).
The following theorem is an analog of Theorem 3.11 and Theorem 4.1 from [9].
Theorem 3.3**.**
Let be an unbounded metric space and let . Then the following statements are equivalent
The family is uniformly bounded. 2.
* is completely strongly porous at infinity.* 3.
The family is uniformly discrete w.r.t. the points defined by (1.2).
If is uniformly bounded, then every pretangent space is bounded, but the converse, in general, does not hold.
Definition 3.4**.**
The set is -strongly porous at infinity if for every sequence there is a subsequence for which is -strongly porous at infinity.
The following theorem gives a boundedness criterion for pretangent spaces.
Theorem 3.5**.**
Let be an unbounded metric space and let . All pretangent spaces to at infinity are bounded if and only if the set is -strongly porous at infinity.
The example of -strongly porous at infinity set which is not completely strongly porous at infinity can be obtained as a modification of Example 2.10 [10].
Using Theorem 3.5 we can obtain a criterion of existence of an unbounded pretangent space. The condition of such type are importnt for development of a theory of pretangent spaces of the second order or more (i.e., pretangent spaces to pretangent spaces, pretangent spaces to pretangent spaces to pretangent spaces and so on).
Let be a metric space. Then for every and we write The following definition can be found in [11].
Definition 3.6**.**
Let be a sequence of subsets of The set
[TABLE]
is the Kuratowski lower limit of in
For and we set
Theorem 3.7**.**
Let be an unbounded metric space and let Then the following statements are equivalent.
There exists an unbounded pretangent space 2.
There exists a scaling sequence such that the Kuratowski lower limit is an unbounded subset of 3.
The set is not -strongly porous at infinity.
Let be a sequence of scaling sequences. Then for every and every unbounded metric space we define a pretangent space by the following inductive rule: if and
[TABLE]
if
Using Theorem 3.7 we can obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 3.8**.**
Let be an unbounded metric space and let If the equality holds, then there is a sequence of scaling sequences such that the pretangent space is unbounded for every
Acknowledgments. The research was supported by the grant of the State Fund for Fundamental Research (project F71/20570).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Roe J. Lectures on coarse geometry. – University Lecture Series 31, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2003.
- 2[2] Protasov I., Zarichnyi M. General Asymptology. – Mathematical Studies Monograph Series, 12 . L’viv: VNTL Publishers, 2007.
- 3[3] Lechiki A., Levi S. Wijsmann convergence in the hyperspace of a metric space // Bull. Unione Mat. Ital. – 1987. – 1-B . – P. 439–452.
- 4[4] Wijsman R. A. Convergence of sequences of convex sets, cones and functions // Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. – 1964. – 70 . – P. 186–188.
- 5[5] Wijsman R. A. Convergence of sequences of convex sets, cones and functions II. // Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. – 1966. – 123 , No 1. – P. 32–45.
- 6[6] Thomson B. S. Real Functions. – Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1170. – Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo, 1985.
- 7[7] Abdullayev F., Dovgoshey O., Küçükaslan M. Compactness and boundedness of tangent spaces to metric spaces // Beitr. Algebra Geom. – 2010. – 51 , No 2. – P.547–576.
- 8[8] Dovgoshey O., Martio O. Tangent spaces to general metric spaces // Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures. Appl. – 2011. – 56 , No 2. – P. 137–155.
