# Local Guarantees in Graph Cuts and Clustering

**Authors:** Moses Charikar, Neha Gupta, Roy Schwartz

arXiv: 1704.00355 · 2017-04-04

## TL;DR

This paper introduces new approximation algorithms for local graph cut problems, focusing on minimizing disagreements and maximizing agreements at individual nodes, advancing the understanding of local guarantees in clustering.

## Contribution

It provides the first known approximation for min-max graph cut problems and improves existing bounds for local disagreement minimization and agreement maximization.

## Key findings

- O(√n)-approximation for min-max disagreement problem
- 7-approximation for local disagreements in complete graphs
- 1/(2+ε)-approximation for max min agreements

## Abstract

Correlation Clustering is an elegant model that captures fundamental graph cut problems such as Min $s-t$ Cut, Multiway Cut, and Multicut, extensively studied in combinatorial optimization. Here, we are given a graph with edges labeled $+$ or $-$ and the goal is to produce a clustering that agrees with the labels as much as possible: $+$ edges within clusters and $-$ edges across clusters. The classical approach towards Correlation Clustering (and other graph cut problems) is to optimize a global objective. We depart from this and study local objectives: minimizing the maximum number of disagreements for edges incident on a single node, and the analogous max min agreements objective. This naturally gives rise to a family of basic min-max graph cut problems. A prototypical representative is Min Max $s-t$ Cut: find an $s-t$ cut minimizing the largest number of cut edges incident on any node. We present the following results: $(1)$ an $O(\sqrt{n})$-approximation for the problem of minimizing the maximum total weight of disagreement edges incident on any node (thus providing the first known approximation for the above family of min-max graph cut problems), $(2)$ a remarkably simple $7$-approximation for minimizing local disagreements in complete graphs (improving upon the previous best known approximation of $48$), and $(3)$ a $1/(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation for maximizing the minimum total weight of agreement edges incident on any node, hence improving upon the $1/(4+\varepsilon)$-approximation that follows from the study of approximate pure Nash equilibria in cut and party affiliation games.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.00355/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.00355/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.00355/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1704.00355