Nonstandard Analysis and Constructivism!
Sam Sanders

TL;DR
This paper examines the relationship between Nonstandard Analysis and constructivism, showing how some theorems can be made constructive while refuting claims about certain axioms' constructive validity.
Contribution
It clarifies the constructive content of nonstandard theorems and corrects misconceptions about the axioms Transfer and Standard Part.
Findings
Some nonstandard theorems yield effective constructive results.
Certain axioms are not constructively valid as claimed by Wattenberg.
The paper refutes specific claims about Transfer and Standard Part axioms.
Abstract
Almost two decades ago, Wattenberg published a paper with the title 'Nonstandard Analysis and Constructivism?' in which he speculates on a possible connection between Nonstandard Analysis and constructive mathematics. We study Wattenberg's work in light of recent research on the aforementioned connection. On one hand, with only slight modification, some of Wattenberg's theorems in Nonstandard Analysis are seen to yield effective and constructive theorems (not involving Nonstandard Analysis). On the other hand, we establish the incorrectness of some of Wattenberg's (explicit and implicit) claims regarding the constructive status of the axioms Transfer and Standard Part of Nonstandard Analysis.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
