# Minimum energy path calculations with Gaussian process regression

**Authors:** Olli-Pekka Koistinen, Emile Maras, Aki Vehtari, Hannes J\'onsson

arXiv: 1703.10423 · 2017-03-31

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a Gaussian process regression method to efficiently compute minimum energy paths in atomic transitions, significantly reducing the number of costly energy evaluations compared to traditional methods.

## Contribution

The authors develop a Gaussian process regression approach that accelerates minimum energy path calculations by minimizing energy evaluations, outperforming standard nudged elastic band methods.

## Key findings

- Energy evaluations reduced to less than a fifth in test cases.
- Method scales favorably with degrees of freedom.
- Potential improvements discussed for further efficiency.

## Abstract

The calculation of minimum energy paths for transitions such as atomic and/or spin re-arrangements is an important task in many contexts and can often be used to determine the mechanism and rate of transitions. An important challenge is to reduce the computational effort in such calculations, especially when ab initio or electron density functional calculations are used to evaluate the energy since they can require large computational effort. Gaussian process regression is used here to reduce significantly the number of energy evaluations needed to find minimum energy paths of atomic rearrangements. By using results of previous calculations to construct an approximate energy surface and then converge to the minimum energy path on that surface in each Gaussian process iteration, the number of energy evaluations is reduced significantly as compared with regular nudged elastic band calculations. For a test problem involving rearrangements of a heptamer island on a crystal surface, the number of energy evaluations is reduced to less than a fifth. The scaling of the computational effort with the number of degrees of freedom as well as various possible further improvements to this approach are discussed.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.10423/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.10423/full.md

## References

31 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.10423/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.10423