How does propaganda influence the opinion dynamics of a population ?
Jithender J. Timothy

TL;DR
This paper uses computer simulations based on a bounded confidence model to analyze how propaganda affects opinion dynamics, including fragmentation, polarization, and radicalization, in online populations.
Contribution
It introduces a simulation framework to study propaganda's impact on opinion evolution and radicalization, highlighting that counter propaganda effectiveness is not always centrist.
Findings
Propaganda can cause radicalization depending on pre-existing opinions.
Optimal counter propaganda is not necessarily centrist.
Online populations can become fragmented, polarized, or harmonious.
Abstract
The evolution of opinions in a population of individuals who constantly interact with a common source of user-generated content (i.e. the internet) and are also subject to propaganda is analyzed using computer simulations. The model is based on the bounded confidence approach. In the absence of propaganda, computer simulations show that the online population as a whole is either fragmented, polarized or in perfect harmony on a certain issue or ideology depending on the uncertainty of individuals in accepting opinions not closer to theirs. On applying the model to simulate radicalization, a proportion of the online population, subject to extremist propaganda radicalize depending on their pre-conceived opinions and opinion uncertainty. It is found that an optimal counter propaganda that prevents radicalization is not necessarily centrist.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence · Complex Network Analysis Techniques
