
TL;DR
This paper explores the arity shapes of polyadic algebraic structures, establishing restrictions, and applying these concepts to operator theory and number theory, including polyadic rings and analogs of classical conjectures.
Contribution
It introduces the partial arity freedom principle for polyadic structures and extends these ideas to operator theory and number theory, including polyadic rings and equations.
Findings
Polyadic structures have restricted arity shapes due to structural relations.
Polyadic operator theory includes new concepts like multistars and polyadic C*-algebras.
Counterexamples show certain classical conjectures do not hold in polyadic rings.
Abstract
Concrete two-set (module-like and algebra-like) algebraic structures are investigated from the viewpoint that the initial arities of all operations are arbitrary. Relations between operations arising from the structure definitions, however, lead to restrictions which determine their possible arity shapes and lead us to the partial arity freedom principle. In this manner, polyadic vector spaces and algebras, dual vector spaces, direct sums, tensor products and inner pairing spaces are reconsidered. As one application, elements of polyadic operator theory are outlined: multistars and polyadic analogs of adjoints, operator norms, isometries and projections are introduced, as well as polyadic C*-algebras, Toeplitz algebras and Cuntz algebras represented by polyadic operators. Another application is connected with number theory, and it is shown that congruence classes are polyadic rings of a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
