Positive-rank elliptic curves arising pythagorean triples
Farzali Izadi, Mehdi Baghalaghdam

TL;DR
This paper introduces new families of elliptic curves with positive rank derived from Pythagorean triples, expanding the understanding of their algebraic and number-theoretic properties.
Contribution
It presents novel constructions of elliptic curves with positive rank based on Pythagorean triples, which were not previously documented.
Findings
New families of elliptic curves with positive rank identified
Connections established between Pythagorean triples and elliptic curve ranks
Potential implications for number theory and algebraic geometry
Abstract
In the present paper, we introduce some new families of elliptic curves with positive rank arrising from Pythagorean triples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory Β· Polynomial and algebraic computation Β· Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
positive-rank elliptic curves arising from Pythagorean triples
Farzali Izadi
Farzali Izadi
Department of Mathematics
Faculty of Science
Urmia University
Urmia 165-57153, Iran
Β andΒ
Mehdi Baghalaghdam
Mehdi Baghalaghdam
Department of Mathematics
Faculty of Science
Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University
Tabriz 53751-71379, Iran
Abstract.
In the present paper, we introduce some new families of elliptic curves with positive rank arrising from Pythagorean triples. We study elliptic curves of the form , where are two different numbers and is a Pythagorean triple (). First we prove that if is a primitive Pythagorean triple(PPT), then the rank of each family is positive. Then we constract subfamilies of rank at least in each family but one with rank at least two, and obtain elliptic curves of high rank in each family. Furthermore, we consider two other new families of elliptic curves of the forms , and , and prove that if is a PPT, then the rank of each family is positive.
Key words and phrases:
Elliptic curves, Rank, Pythagorean triples
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
11G05, 14H52, 14G05
1. introduction
An elliptic curve (EC) over the rationals is a curve of genus , defined over , together with a -rational point, and is expressed by the generalized Weierstrass equation of the form
[TABLE]
where .
A theorem of Mordell-Weil [11] states that the rational points on , form a finitely generated abelian group under a natural group law, i.e., , where is a nonnegative integer called the rank of E, and is the subgroup of elements of finite order in , called the torsion subgroup of . The rank of is the rank of the free part of this group.
By Mazurβs theorem [9], the torsion subgroup is one of the following groups: with or , with .
Currently there is no general unconditional algorithm to compute the rank. It is not known which integers can occur as ranks, but a well-know conjecture says that the rank can be arbitrarily large. Elliptic curves of large rank are hard to find and the current record is a curve of rank at least , found by Elkies in . (see[1])
Also a recent paper by J. Park et al. [7] presents a heuristic suggesting that there are only finitely many elliptic curves of rank greater than . Their heuristic based on modeling the ranks and Shafarevich-Tate groups of elliptic curves simultaneously, and relies on a theorem counting alternating integer matrices of specified rank. Also in a paper by B. Naske,cki [6], proved that for a generic triple the lower bound of the rank of the EC over is , and for some explicitly given infinite family the rank is . To each family, the author attach an elliptic surface fibred over the projective line and show that the lower bounds for the rank are optimal, in the sense that for each generic fiber of such an elliptic surface its corresponding Mordell-Weil group over the function field has rank or respectively.
Specialization is a significant technique for finding a lower bound of the rank of a family of elliptic curves. One can consider an EC on the rational function field and then obtain elliptic curves over by specializing the variable to suitable values (see [10, Chapter III,Theorem 11.4] for more information).
Using this technique, Nagao and Kauyo [5] have found curves of rank, and Fermigier [2] obtained a curve of rank .
In order to determine , one should find the generators of the free part of the Mordell-Weil group. Determining the * associated height matrix* is a useful technique for finding a set of generators.
If the determinnat of associated height matrix is nonzero, then the given points are linearly independent and (see[10, ChapterIII] for more information).
In this paper, we study elliptic curves of the form , where are two different numbers and is a Pythagorean triple (). First we prove that if is a primitive Pythagorean triple(PPT), then the rank of each family is positive. By using both specialization and associated height matrix techniques, we constract subfamilies of rank at least in each family but one with rank at least two, and obtain elliptic curves of high rank in each family. Furthermore, we consider two other families of elliptic curves of the forms , and , and prove that if is a PPT, then the rank of each family is positive. These familes are similar to another family of curves with which is a special case of the well-known Frey family. In [3], a subfamily of the elliptic curve , with the rank at least , has been introduced. In [4], it is proven that the rank of the elliptic curve , is positive and also in [6] a subfamily of this elliptic curve with the rank at least is obtained.
We need two standard facts in this paper:
Lemma 1**.**
*The following relations will generate all primitive Pythagorean triples (, ): , , ,
where , and , are positive integers with , and with and coprime and not both odd.*
Lemma 2**.**
*(Nagell-Lutz theorem) Let , be a non-singular cubic curve with integer coefficients , and let be the discriminant of the cubic polynomial ,
. Let be a rational point of finite order. Then and are integers and, either , in which case P has order two, or else divides . (see [9], page: 56 )*
2. The EC
In each family, let first be a PPT. First by letting , in the above elliptic curve, we get , and . Then the point is on the aforementioned elliptic curve. Note that this point is of infinite order, because in a PPT we have and , i.e., the numbers and are not integers, then by lemma , the rank of the above elliptic curve is positive.
Second we look at
[TABLE]
as a 1-parameter family by letting
[TABLE]
where . Then instead of (2.1) one can take
[TABLE]
Theorem 2.1**.**
There are infinitely many elliptic curves of the form (2.3) with rank .
Proof.
Clearly we have two points
[TABLE]
Now we impose a point on (2.3) with -coordinate equal to . It implies that , to be a square, say . Hence
[TABLE]
with . Hence instead of (2.3), one can take
[TABLE]
or
[TABLE]
equipped with the three points
[TABLE]
When we specialize to , we obtain a set of points , on
[TABLE]
Using SAGE [8], one can easily check that associated height matrix of has non-zero determinant , showing that these three points are independent and so . ( Actually the rank is .) Specialization result of Silverman [10] implies that for all but finitely many rational numbers, the rank of is at least . For the values , and , the rank of is equal to and , respectively. β
3. The EC
We study the elliptic curve
[TABLE]
where . We construct a subfamily with rank at least .
Theorem 3.1**.**
There are infinitely many elliptic curves of the form (5.1) with rank .
Proof.
Clearly we have two points
[TABLE]
Letting , in (5.1), yields , and . Then the third point is . By lemma , if is a PPT, then this point is of infinite order, because , , and the numbers , and are not integers.
If we let , and , then we get , and . Then the point is on the elliptic curve (5.1).
When we specialize to , we obtain a set of points , lying on
[TABLE]
Using SAGE , one can easily check that associated height matrix of the points or has non-zero determinant , showing that these three points are independent and so the rank of the elliptic curve (5.1) is at least , (Actually the rank is .). Specialization result of Silverman implies that for all but finitely many rational numbers, the rank of is at least . For the value , the rank is equal to . β
4. The EC
We consider the elliptic curve
[TABLE]
where , and construct a subfamily with rank at least .
Theorem 4.1**.**
There are infinitely many elliptic curves of the form (5.1) with rank .
Proof.
Clearly we have two points
[TABLE]
Letting , in (4.1), yields , and . Then the third point is . Again by lemma , if is a PPT, this point is of infinite order, because , , and the numbers , and are not integers. Now we impose a point on (4.1) with -coordinate equal to . Then we have . It implies that to be a square, say . Hence , and . with . Then the point is on the elliptic curve (4.1).
When we specialize to (), we obtain a set of points , lying on
[TABLE]
Using SAGE, one can easily check that associated height matrix of the points and has non-zero determinant , and , respectively. This shows that these three points are independent and so the rank of the elliptic curve (4.3) is at least , (Actually the rank is .). Specialization result of Silverman implies that for all but finitely many rational numbers, the rank of is at least . For the values , and , the rank of is equal to , and , respectively. β
5. The EC
We consider the elliptic curve
[TABLE]
where , and construct a subfamily with rank at least .
Theorem 5.1**.**
There are infinitely many elliptic curves of the form (5.1) with rank .
Proof.
Clearly we have two points
[TABLE]
Letting , in (5.1), yields , and . Then the third point is . This point is of infinite order, because in a PPT we have and , i.e., the numbers and are not integers, then the rank of the above elliptic curve is positive. If we let , and , then we get , and . Then the point is on the elliptic curve (5.1).
When we specialize to , we obtain a set of points , lying on
[TABLE]
Using SAGE, one can easily check that associated height matrix of the points or has non-zero determinant , showing that these three points are independent and so the rank of the elliptic curve (5.1) is at least , (Actually the rank is .). Specialization result of Silverman implies that for all but finitely many rational numbers, the rank of is at least . For the value , the rank is equal to . β
6. The EC
We study the elliptic curve
[TABLE]
where . We construct a subfamily with rank at least .
Theorem 6.1**.**
There are infinitely many elliptic curves of the form (7.1) with rank .
Proof.
Clearly we have two points
[TABLE]
Letting , in (7.1), yields , and . Then the third point is . This point is of infinite order, because in a PPT, we have and , i.e., the numbers and are not integers, then the rank of the above elliptic curve is positive. Now we impose a point on (4.1) with -coordinate equal to . Then we have . It implies that to be a square, say . Hence we can get , and . with . Then the point is on the elliptic curve (7.1).
When we specialize to (), we obtain a set of points , lying on
[TABLE]
Using SAGE, one can easily check that associated height matrix of the points or has non-zero determinant . (The determinant of points is non-zero, too.) This shows that these two points ( in each set) are independent and so the rank of the elliptic curve (6.3) is at least , (Actually the rank is .). Specialization result of Silverman implies that for all but finitely many rational numbers, the rank of is at least . β
7. The EC
We study the elliptic curve
[TABLE]
where . We construct a subfamily with rank at least .
Theorem 7.1**.**
There are infinitely many elliptic curves of the form (7.1) with rank .
Proof.
Clearly we have two points
[TABLE]
Letting , in (7.1), yields , and . Then the third point is . Note that this point is of infinite order, because in a PPT, we have and , i.e., the numbers and are not integers, then the rank of the aforementioned elliptic curve is positive. If we impose a point on (4.1) with -coordinate equal to . Then we get the point .
When we specialize to , we obtain a set of points , lying on
[TABLE]
Using SAGE, one can easily check that associated height matrix of the points and have non-zero determinants , and , respectively. This shows that these two points (in each set) are independent and so the rank of the elliptic curve (7.3) is at least , (Actually the rank is .). Specialization result of Silverman implies that for all but finitely many rational numbers, the rank of is at least . β
8. The EC
Theorem 8.1**.**
Let be a PPT. Then the rank of the aforementioned elliptic curve is positive.
Proof.
We have . Then it suffices that we study the elliptic curve
[TABLE]
Note that . Now if in (8.1), we take , then we get , and . Therefore the first point on (8.1) is . Note that the order of this point is infinite, because in a PPT, the number is not divisable by , and, the numbers and are not integers. (Otherwise if is a prime number that divides , then must divide one of , . Now in view of the relation , p divides , , and , that is not correct, because is a PPT: .) Then the rank of the elliptic curve (8.1) is always positive. if we let , then we get , and . Then the second point on (8.1) is the point . Letting , yields the third and fourth points . β
Remark 8.2**.**
Note that if in a PPT, , is odd, then we may by another method prove that the rank of the aforementioned elliptic curve is positive. We prove that in the point , the number does not divide , otherwise must divide . Then divides , because is odd. This is not correct, because is a PPT. Then the point , is of infinite order. Now the result follows.
9. The EC
Theorem 9.1**.**
Let be a PPT. Then the rank of the above elliptic curve is positive.
Proof.
We have . Then it suffices that we study the elliptic curve
[TABLE]
Note that . If in (9.1), we take , then we get , and . Then the first point on (9.1) is . Note that the order of this point is infinite, because in a PPT the number is not divisable by , and, the numbers and are not integers, this can be similarly proven. Then we conclude that the rank of the elliptic curve (9.1) is always positive. By letting , we get , and . Then the second point on (9.1) is the point . Letting , yields the third and fourth points . β
Remark 9.2**.**
Note that if in a PPT, , is odd, then we may by another method prove that the rank of the aforementioned elliptic curve is positive. We prove that in the point , the number does not divide , otherwise must divide . Then divides , because is odd. This is not correct, because is a PPT. Then the point , is of infinite order. Now the result follows.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1]
- 2[1] A. Dujella, High rank elliptic curves with prescribed torsion, http://www.maths.hr/ duje/tors.html( 2012 2012 2012 ).
- 3[2] S. Fermigier, Construction of high-rank elliptic curves over β β \mathbb{Q} and β β ( t ) β π‘ \mathbb{Q}(t) , In: Algorithmic Number Theory, ANTS-II Proc., ed. by H. Cohen, Lect. Notes in Comp. Sci. 1122 1122 1122 , Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1996 1996 1996 , 115 β 120 115 120 115-120 .
- 4[3] F. Izadi and K. Nabardi, A family of elliptic curves of rank at least 4 4 4 , to appear in involve a journal of mathematic volum 9 9 9 .No 2 2 2 .
- 5[4] F. Izadi, K. Nabardi, and F. Khoshnam, A new family of elliptic curves with positive rank arising from Pythagorean triples, available in ar Xiv:1012.5837 v 3, 2011 2011 2011 .
- 6[5] K. Nagao and T. Kouya, An example of an elliptic curve over β β \mathbb{Q} with Rank β₯ 21 absent 21 \geq 21 , Proc. Japan Acad. 70 70 70 , Ser. A, No. 4 4 4 ( 1994 1994 1994 ), 104 β 105 104 105 104-105 .
- 7[6] B. Naske,cki, Mordell-Weil ranks of families of elliptic curves associated to Pythagorean triples, Acta Arith. 160 160 160 ( 2013 2013 2013 ), 159 β 183 159 183 159-183 .
- 8[7] J. Park, B. Poonen, J. Voight and M. M. Wood, A heuristic for boundedness of ranks of elliptic curves, http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1602.01431 1602.01431 1602.01431 .
