# Ultra-deep Large Binocular Camera U-band Imaging of the GOODS-North   Field: Depth vs. Resolution

**Authors:** Teresa A. Ashcraft, Rogier A. Windhorst, Rolf A. Jansen, Seth H., Cohen, Andrea Grazian, Diego Paris, Adriano Fontana, Emanuele Giallongo,, Roberto Speziali, Vincenzo Testa, Konstantina Boutsia, Robert W. O'Connell,, Michael Rutkowski, Russell Ryan, Claudia Scarlata, and Benjamin Weiner

arXiv: 1703.09874 · 2018-05-23

## TL;DR

This study compares the effects of image resolution and depth in U-band observations of the GOODS-North field, revealing how resolution impacts object detection, galaxy structure visibility, and flux measurements at faint magnitudes.

## Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of the trade-off between image depth and resolution in deep field imaging, highlighting the benefits of deeper, lower-resolution mosaics for faint object detection.

## Key findings

- Optimal resolution images detect fewer faint objects beyond U_AB=27 mag.
- Deeper images reveal more galaxy structure and clumpy features.
- Flux measurements are consistent within 0.5 mag for most bright galaxies.

## Abstract

We present a study of the trade-off between depth and resolution using a large number of U-band imaging observations in the GOODS-North field (Giavalisco et al. 2004) from the Large Binocular Camera (LBC) on the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT). Having acquired over 30 hours of data (315 images with 5-6 mins exposures), we generated multiple image mosaics, starting with the best atmospheric seeing images (FWHM $\lesssim$0.8"), which constitute $\sim$10% of the total data set. For subsequent mosaics, we added in data with larger seeing values until the final, deepest mosaic included all images with FWHM $\lesssim$1.8" ($\sim$94% of the total data set). From the mosaics, we made object catalogs to compare the optimal-resolution, yet shallower image to the lower-resolution but deeper image. We show that the number counts for both images are $\sim$90% complete to $U_{AB}$ $\lesssim26$. Fainter than $U_{AB}$$\sim$ 27, the object counts from the optimal-resolution image start to drop-off dramatically (90% between $U_{AB}$ = 27 and 28 mag), while the deepest image with better surface-brightness sensitivity ($\mu^{AB}_{U}$$\lesssim$ 32 mag arcsec$^{-2}$) show a more gradual drop (10% between $U_{AB}$ $\simeq$ 27 and 28 mag). For the brightest galaxies within the GOODS-N field, structure and clumpy features within the galaxies are more prominent in the optimal-resolution image compared to the deeper mosaics. Finally, we find - for 220 brighter galaxies with $U_{AB}$$\lesssim$ 24 mag - only marginal differences in total flux between the optimal-resolution and lower-resolution light-profiles to $\mu^{AB}_{U}$$\lesssim$ 32 mag arcsec$^{-2}$. In only 10% of the cases are the total-flux differences larger than 0.5 mag. This helps constrain how much flux can be missed from galaxy outskirts, which is important for studies of the Extragalactic Background Light.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.09874/full.md

## Figures

28 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.09874/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.09874/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.09874