This Just In: Fake News Packs a Lot in Title, Uses Simpler, Repetitive Content in Text Body, More Similar to Satire than Real News
Benjamin D. Horne, Sibel Adali

TL;DR
This study reveals that fake news often resembles satire more than real news, relying on catchy titles and simple content to influence audiences who do not verify sources, rather than through strong arguments.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that fake news is stylistically closer to satire than real news and identifies key features like title structure and proper nouns that distinguish it.
Findings
Fake news resembles satire more than real news.
Title structure and proper nouns are significant differentiators.
Fake news targets audiences unlikely to read beyond titles.
Abstract
The problem of fake news has gained a lot of attention as it is claimed to have had a significant impact on 2016 US Presidential Elections. Fake news is not a new problem and its spread in social networks is well-studied. Often an underlying assumption in fake news discussion is that it is written to look like real news, fooling the reader who does not check for reliability of the sources or the arguments in its content. Through a unique study of three data sets and features that capture the style and the language of articles, we show that this assumption is not true. Fake news in most cases is more similar to satire than to real news, leading us to conclude that persuasion in fake news is achieved through heuristics rather than the strength of arguments. We show overall title structure and the use of proper nouns in titles are very significant in differentiating fake from real. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMisinformation and Its Impacts · Social Media and Politics
