Cluster validation by measurement of clustering characteristics relevant to the user
Christian Hennig

TL;DR
This paper introduces multiple multidimensional validation criteria for clustering quality, allowing users to evaluate and compare clusterings based on characteristics relevant to their specific application needs.
Contribution
It proposes a methodology to standardize and aggregate various clustering characteristics, enabling tailored validation based on user-defined criteria and weights.
Findings
Multiple validation criteria for clustering quality are introduced.
A standardization method allows combining different clustering characteristics.
The approach supports application-specific weighting of validation criteria.
Abstract
There are many cluster analysis methods that can produce quite different clusterings on the same dataset. Cluster validation is about the evaluation of the quality of a clustering; "relative cluster validation" is about using such criteria to compare clusterings. This can be used to select one of a set of clusterings from different methods, or from the same method ran with different parameters such as different numbers of clusters. There are many cluster validation indexes in the literature. Most of them attempt to measure the overall quality of a clustering by a single number, but this can be inappropriate. There are various different characteristics of a clustering that can be relevant in practice, depending on the aim of clustering, such as low within-cluster distances and high between-cluster separation. In this paper, a number of validation criteria will be introduced that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Clustering Algorithms Research · Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
