Zero Points of Chiral Condensate
V.G. Ksenzov, A.I. Romanov

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a (1+1)-dimensional model with massless fermions and a massive scalar, revealing two distinct points where the chiral condensate vanishes, indicating phase transitions related to symmetry restoration and scalar mass sign change.
Contribution
It provides a one-loop calculation of the chiral condensate in a specific Yukawa model, identifying two zero points associated with different phase transitions.
Findings
Chiral condensate vanishes at two coupling values.
First zero corresponds to discrete symmetry restoration.
Second zero distinguishes positive and negative scalar mass squared.
Abstract
We investigate a model with a massless fermion and a massive scalar field with the Yukawa interaction between these two fields. The model possess a discrete symmetry. The chiral condensate is calculated in one-loop approximation in -dimensional spacetime. It was shown that the chiral condensate vanishes at two different values of the coupling constant. At the first of them there is a phase transition in which the discrete symmetry is restored. At the second zero of the chiral condensate it takes place a phase transition which distinguishes the positive from the negative , where is an effective mass of the scalar field.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Zero Points of Chiral Condensate
V.G. Ksenzov
State Scientific Center Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, 117218, Russia
A.I. Romanov
National Research Nuclear University, MEPHI, Moscow, 115409, Russia
Abstract
We investigate a model with a massless fermion and a massive scalar field with the Yukawa interaction between these two fields. The model possess a discrete symmetry. The chiral condensate is calculated in one-loop approximation in -dimensional spacetime. It was shown that the chiral condensate vanishes at two different values of the coupling constant. At the first of them there is a phase transition in which the discrete symmetry is restored. At the second zero of the chiral condensate it takes place a phase transition which distinguishes the positive from the negative , where is an effective mass of the scalar field.
I Introduction
It is fairly well-known that a dynamical chiral symmetry breaking is characterized by the chiral condensate which develops a non-vanish vacuum expectation value GL , NL , GN . So we believe that the vanishing of the chiral condensate is associate with the restoration of symmetry, but this is not entirely true. It turns out that the chiral condensate may vanish at several points.
Really, in our previous papers KR1 , KR2 we investigated a model of a self-interacting massive scalar and a massless fermion fields with the Yukawa interaction in a -dimensional spacetime. The lagrangian of the model is invariant under the discrete transformation. The chiral condensate is an order parameter to describe a phase transition related to a dynamical discrete symmetry breaking. We also found that the chiral condensate vanishes at some other point of the coupling constant is not associated with the discrete symmetry KR2 .
The purpose of this paper is to research what means the second zero of the chiral condensate. It is argued that in this case it takes place a phase transition which distinguishes the positive from the negative , where is an effective mass of the scalar field. The phase transition of such a kind was discussed in W , KR3 .
II Chiral condensate as an order parameter for two different phase transitions
To realize what means vanishing of the chiral condensate at the second point of the coupling constant we analyze a specific field-theoretic model with the Lagrangian density given by
[TABLE]
where is a real scalar field, is a massless fermion field and index runs from 1 to . This model allows us to obtain an exact result in an analytical form.
The Lagrangian (1) is invariant under the discrete transformation
[TABLE]
The symmetry (2) is broken either by the chiral condensate or by the scalar field which develops a non-vanishing vacuum expectation value (v.e.v). As it was shown in GN – KR2 , in this model the chiral condensate is connected with v.e.v. of scalar field. It should be noted, that the symmetry (2) takes place only at the classical level but quantum contributions violate it for any , except . In latter case the chiral condensate must vanishes. As we discussed in KR2 , the chiral condensate also vanishes at some other coupling constant is not associated with the discrete symmetry. To study this phenomenon we formally define the chiral condensate using the functional integral
[TABLE]
where is a normalization constant. Eq. (3) is rewritten as
[TABLE]
The fermionic Lagrangian is quadratic in the field and we can integrate over them, getting
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where is the ultraviolet cutoff.
We want to obtain the chiral condensate in the framework of one-loop approximation. Therefore we calculate Eq. (5) using the method of the stationary phase. A minimum of the effective action of the system is reached if the effective potential and kinetic energy are minimal on its own:
[TABLE]
Let the constant scalar field satisfies condition (6). The factor in front of the exponent in Eq. (5) is fixed at the point and we obtain
[TABLE]
The effective potential and the chiral condensate require renormalization. We renormalize effective potential following Coleman and Weinberg CW and Gross and Neveu GN by demanding that
[TABLE]
Then the renormalized chiral condensate is written as
[TABLE]
is determined by mean the renormalized effective potential , which is written as
[TABLE]
Here and are dimensionless.
The effective potential has the minimum, if
[TABLE]
Note that this result coincides with that of refs. GN , KR1 .
The renormalized chiral condensate is written as
[TABLE]
where .
One can see the chiral condensate equals to zero, if or , i.e. when or . In the latter case the discrete symmetry (2) is not restored.
To find out with which physical phenomenon corresponds the second zero of the chiral condensate we expand the effective potential at the point . We present , where describes small fluctuations () around the point , and restrict ourselves to terms , then we get
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The mass term in is changes sign as a function of . Really, when , , and scalar field has a vacuum expectation value equals to zero . If , , we get , where . At the point we have , and (see Eq. (11)). The chiral condensate also is equal to zero. This qualitative difference shows that the phase transition exists (GL , W , KR3 ) and the chiral condensate is an order parameter.
Continuing our investigation of the model we want to take into account a small-interacting scalar field by adding term , then the renormalized effective potential in one-loop approximation is
[TABLE]
Here satisfies demanding that
[TABLE]
To study the analytically in the vicinity of we consider and , , then we get
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and . This tells us, that the qualitative behavior of the theory does not change, if .
III Conclusions
In this paper we analyzed the zero points of the chiral condensate in model consisting of a scalar and a fermion fields with the Yukawa interaction in the framework of the one-loop approximation. The model is invariant under the discrete transformation. In our pervious paper KR2 we show that the chiral condensate vanishes at two different coupling constants. At the first of them there is a phase transition, which describes dynamical breaking of the discrete symmetry. In our paper we showed that the second zero of the chiral condensate describes the phase transition as a function of the coupling constant, which distinguishes the positive effective scalar mass from the negative one. The result is obtained analytically. We believe that this discussion can help to analyze similar phenomena in more realistic models.
Acknowlegdements
We are grateful to O.V. Kancheli for useful discussions.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1(1) V.L. Ginzburg and L.D. Landau, JETP (USSR) 20 , 1064 (1950).
- 2(2) Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122 , 345 (1961).
- 3(3) D.J. Gross and A. Neveu, Phys. Rev. D 10 , 3235 (1974).
- 4(4) V.G. Ksenzov and A.I. Romanov, Modern Phys. Lett. A. Vol. 29, 38 , 1450200 (2014).
- 5(5) V.G. Ksenzov and A.I. Romanov, ar Xiv: 1512.04472 v 1 [hep-ph].
- 6(6) E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 149 , 285 (1979).
- 7(7) V.G. Ksenzov and A.I. Romanov, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 76 , 534 (2013).
- 8(8) S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 7 1888 (1973).
