The ($n+1$)-Lipschitz homotopy group of the Heisenberg group $\mathbb{H}^n$
Piotr Haj{\l}asz

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that for dimensions n≥2, the Lipschitz homotopy group of the Heisenberg group is nontrivial, revealing new topological properties of these groups in geometric analysis.
Contribution
It establishes the nontriviality of the Lipschitz homotopy group of the Heisenberg group for n≥2, a novel result in geometric topology.
Findings
The Lipschitz homotopy group π_{n+1}^{Lip}(H^n) is non-zero for n≥2.
This result provides new insights into the topological structure of the Heisenberg group.
The paper advances understanding of Lipschitz homotopy theory in sub-Riemannian geometry.
Abstract
We prove that for , the Lipschitz homotopy group of the Heisenberg group is nontrivial.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
The ()-Lipschitz homotopy group of the Heisenberg group
Piotr Hajłasz
P. Hajłasz: Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, 301 Thackeray Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA, [email protected]
Abstract.
We prove that for , the Lipschitz homotopy group of the Heisenberg group is nontrivial.
Key words and phrases:
Heisenberg group, Lipschitz homotopy groups
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 53C17; Secondary: 55Q40
P.H. was supported by NSF grant DMS-1500647.
1. Introduction
The Lipschitz homotopy groups of a metric space are defined in the same way as the classical homotopy groups, with the exception that both the maps and homotopies are required to be Lipschitz. We emphasize that we make no restriction on the Lipschitz constants. In particular, we do not require the Lipschitz constant of a homotopy to be comparable to the Lipschitz constant of maps that are Lipschitz homotopic. The notion of Lipschitz homotopy groups was introduced in [4] with the main purpose of studying the Lipschitz homotopy groups of the Heisenberg group (equipped with the Carnot-Carathéodory metric). Note that the classical homotopy groups of the Heisenberg group are zero since the space is homeomorphic to a Euclidean space. The following results are known
[TABLE]
The main result of this paper adds one more case to this list.
Theorem 1.1**.**
For , .
The case is already contained in [7], but with a very different proof. As we will see, the result has a very short proof and it is somewhat surprising that it has not been noticed before.
The proofs that and employ the fact that the groups and are infinite so one can use differential forms to detect non-trivial elements in these groups (using degree and the Hopf invariant respectively). To the best of my knowledge, Theorem 1.1 for , is a first result showing non-trivial Lipschitz homotopy groups of the Heisenberg groups when the corresponding homotopy groups of the spheres are finite, for .
When , Lipschitz homotopy groups are abelian, but they are usually uncountably generated; for a detailed proof that is uncountably generated, see [4]. However, very little is known about the structure of these groups. For example it is not known if has elements of finite order. Nevertheless, the fact that a Lipschitz homotopy group is nontrivial provides a lot of information about the structure of Lipschitz maps into the Heisenberg group.
In order to show that , we need to construct a Lipschitz mapping that has no Lipschitz extension , see comments following Definition 4.1 in [4]. So far, the only known method of proving that is based on the idea described below.
The following fact is well known, see [2, 4, 5].
Lemma 1.2**.**
For , there is a smooth and horizontal embedding of the sphere , that is is a smooth embedding and the tangent space to the embedded sphere is contained in the horizontal distribution of . It follows that the embedding is bi-Lipschitz.
Now if and , , then, in some cases, one can prove that if is any map that satisfies the conclusion of Lemma 1.2, then does not admit a Lipschitz extension . This was the method used in all of the known cases of and it is also a method used in this paper. For this reason I conjectured that if , then . While the conjecture is still open, in many cases the approach to a proof would have to be very different from the one described here, because of the following result of Wenger and Young [12, Theorem 1].
Theorem 1.3**.**
If is Lipschitz and , then can be extended to a Lipschitz map .
The result is sharp: it does not extend to the case of when is even. Indeed, if is even and has a non-zero Hopf invariant, then as was shown in [7], the map does not admit a Lipschitz extension and hence . Also the proof of Theorem 1.1 shows that Theorem 1.3 cannot be extended to the case which is somewhat surprising in view of [12, Theorem 2].
Note that Theorem 1.3 shows that the method described above of proving that cannot be used in the range .
2. Proof of Theorem 1.1
Let be a smooth and horizontal embedding of the sphere into the Heisenberg group as in Lemma 1.2. Recall that
[TABLE]
Let be a smooth map such that . We will show that the map
[TABLE]
does not admit a Lipschitz extension
[TABLE]
which will prove that . Suppose to the contrary that is a Lipschitz extension of . Since the Heisenberg group is purely unrectifiable in dimensions , [1, 9] (see [3] for a different proof), we conclude that , where stands for the Hausdorff dimension with respect to the Carnot-Carathéodory metric in . To arrive to a contradiction it suffices to show that .
We will need the following result of Gromov [6, Theorem 3.1.A], see also [10, Lemma 22 and Theorem 6].
Lemma 2.1**.**
If a set has topological dimension at least , then .
In fact the statement of Gromov’s result only says that the Hausdorff dimension of is greater than or equal so one cannot conclude from the statement of Gromov’s result that . However, the proof of Gromov’s result clearly shows that , see the proof of Lemma 22 in [10].
Thus it suffices to show that the topological dimension of is greater than or equal to . Suppose to the contrary that . We will need the following classical result [8, Theorem VI.4].
Lemma 2.2**.**
A separable metric space has topological dimension less than or equal if and only if for each closed set and a continuous map , there is a continuous extension of .
Let . Since is a compact subset of and , there is a continuous extension of . Note that is a continuous extension of
[TABLE]
which contradicts the assumption that . The proof is complete.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Ambrosio, L., Kirchheim, B.: Rectifiable sets in metric and Banach spaces. Math. Ann. 318 (2000), 527–555.
- 2[2] Balogh, Z., Fässler, K. S.: Rectifiability and Lipschitz extensions into the Heisenberg group. Math. Z. 263 (2009), 673–683.
- 3[3] Balogh, Z., Hajłasz, P., Wildrick, K.: Weak contact equations for mappings into Heisenberg groups. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 63 (2014), 1839–1873.
- 4[4] De Jarnette, N., Hajłasz, P., Lukyanenko, L. Tyson, J. T.: On the lack of density of Lipschitz mappings in Sobolev spaces with Heisenberg target. Conform. Geom. Dyn. 18 (2014), 119–156.
- 5[5] Ekholm, T., Etnyre, J., Sullivan, M.: Non-isotopic Legendrian submanifolds in ℝ 2 n + 1 superscript ℝ 2 𝑛 1 \mathbb{R}^{2n+1} . J. Differential Geom. 71 (2005), 85–128.
- 6[6] Gromov, M.: Carnot-Carathéodory spaces seen from within. Sub-Riemannian geometry, pp. 79–323, Progr. Math., 144, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1996.
- 7[7] Hajłasz, P., Schikorra, A., Tyson, J. T.: Homotopy groups of spheres and Lipschitz homotopy groups of Heisenberg groups. Geom. Funct. Anal. 24 (2014), 245–268.
- 8[8] Hurewicz, W., Wallman, H.: Dimension Theory. Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 4. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1941.
