# Count-ception: Counting by Fully Convolutional Redundant Counting

**Authors:** Joseph Paul Cohen, Genevieve Boucher, Craig A. Glastonbury and, Henry Z. Lo, Yoshua Bengio

arXiv: 1703.08710 · 2017-07-25

## TL;DR

This paper introduces Count-ception, a fully convolutional neural network that predicts redundant object counts in images, improving counting accuracy by averaging over overlapping predictions, and outperforms previous methods.

## Contribution

The paper proposes a novel redundant counting approach and a new deep neural network architecture called Count-ception for more accurate object counting.

## Key findings

- Achieved 20% reduction in MAE over previous state-of-the-art.
- Introduced a fully convolutional network for counting with redundancy.
- Demonstrated improved accuracy on benchmark datasets.

## Abstract

Counting objects in digital images is a process that should be replaced by machines. This tedious task is time consuming and prone to errors due to fatigue of human annotators. The goal is to have a system that takes as input an image and returns a count of the objects inside and justification for the prediction in the form of object localization. We repose a problem, originally posed by Lempitsky and Zisserman, to instead predict a count map which contains redundant counts based on the receptive field of a smaller regression network. The regression network predicts a count of the objects that exist inside this frame. By processing the image in a fully convolutional way each pixel is going to be accounted for some number of times, the number of windows which include it, which is the size of each window, (i.e., 32x32 = 1024). To recover the true count we take the average over the redundant predictions. Our contribution is redundant counting instead of predicting a density map in order to average over errors. We also propose a novel deep neural network architecture adapted from the Inception family of networks called the Count-ception network. Together our approach results in a 20% relative improvement (2.9 to 2.3 MAE) over the state of the art method by Xie, Noble, and Zisserman in 2016.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.08710/full.md

## Figures

21 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.08710/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.08710/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.08710