Homotopy and Commutativity Principle
Ravi A. Rao and Sampat Sharma
Key words and phrases:
Keywords:
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
2
010 Mathematics Subject Classification:13C10, 13H99, 19B10, 19B14.
Homotopy, Classical groups, Transvection groups.
1. Introduction
R will denote a commutative ring with 1=0 in this article, unless stated otherwise.
The subject of injective stability for the linear group (i.e. K1(R)) began
in the famous paper of
Bass–Milnor–Serre ([8]) where it was shown, in essence, that large
sized stably elementary matrices were actually elementary matrices. This was
shown by showing that the sequence (of
pointed sets)
[TABLE]
stabilizes. The estimate they got was n=3, when dim(R)=1, and
for n≥max{3,d+3} otherwise. They conjectured that the
correct bound for the linear quotients should be
n≥max{3,d+2}; which was established by L.N. Vaserstein
in [39].
In [36] A.A. Suslin established the normality of the elementary
linear subgroup En(R) in GLn(R), for n≥3. This was a major
surprise at that time as it was known due to the work of P.M. Cohn in
[12] that in general E2(R) is not normal in GL2(R). This is
the initial precursor to study the non-stable K1 groups En(R)SLn(R), n≥3.
This theorem can also be got as a consequence of the Local-Global Principle of
D. Quillen (for projective modules) in [26]; and its analogue for the
linear group of elementary matrices En(R[X]), when n≥3 due to
A. Suslin in [36]. In fact, in [9] it is shown that, in some sense,
the normality property of the elementary group En(R) in SLn(R) is
equivalent to having a Local-Global Principle for En(R[X]).
In [6], A. Bak proved the following beautiful result:
Theorem 1.1**.**
(A. Bak) For an almost commutative ring R with identity with
centre C(R). The group En(R)SLn(R)
is nilpotent of class atmost δ(C(R))+3−n, where
δ(C(R))<∞ and n≥3, where δ(C(R)) is
the Bass–Serre- dimension of C(R).
This theorem, which is proved by a localisation and completion technique,
which evolved from an adaptation of the proof of the
Suslin’s K1-analogue of Quillen’s
Local-Global Principle, was the starting point of our investigation. In this
paper, we show (see Corollary 2.20)
Theorem 1.2**.**
Let R be a local ring, and let A=R[X]. Then the
group En(A)SLn(A) is an abelian group for n≥3.
This theorem is a simple consequence of the following principle (see
Theorem 2.19):
Theorem 1.3**.**
(Homotopy and commutativity principle):
Let R be a commutative ring. Let α∈SLn(R), n≥3, be homotopic to the identity. Then, for any β∈SLn(R),
αβ=βαε, for some ε∈En(R).
This principle is a consequence of the Quillen–Suslin Local-Global principle;
and using a non-symmetric application of it as done by A. Bak in
[6].
The existence of a Local-Global Principle enables us to prove similar results
in various groups.
We restrict ourselves to the classical symplectic,
orthogonal groups (and their relative versions); and to the automorphism groups
of a projective module (with
a unimodular element), a symplectic module (with a hyperbolic summand), and an
orthogonal module (with a hyperbolic symmand).
However, our results can be
extended to other Chevalley groups, relative Chevalley groups, reductive
groups, etc. where such Local-Global Principles exist due to results of E. Abe
in [1], A. Stepanov in [4], [34], Asok–Hoyois–Wendt in
[5], A. Stavrova in [33], respectively.
We could show that the
symplectic quotients were abelian, but we could only establish that the
orthogonal quotients are solvable of length atmost two. We do believe that the
orthogonal quotient groups are also abelian; and prove this when the base
ring is a regular local ring containing a field.
In ([20], Theorem 4.1), W. van der Kallen has described an abelian
group structure on the orbit space of unimodular rows under elementary
action En(R)Umn(R), when
n≥3 and d≤2n−4, where d is the dimension of R. In
the paper [19] he does it in the case when n=d+1, where d is
the dimension of R; thereby extending the seminal work of L.N. Vaserstein
in ([40], Theorem 5.2), when d=2. His estimates come from similar
estimates being true in case when R is the ring of continuous real valued
functions on a compact space X.
Let Compr(R) denote the subset of Umr(R) consisting of the (completable)
unimodular rows which can be completed to a matrix of determinant one.
One of the interesting application of Theorem 1.2 is that the
orbit set of completable unimodular rows over R[X], when R is a local
ring, modulo the elementary action has an abelian group structure under
matrix multiplication. (See Theorem 2.33.)
In particular, if one believes that the Bass–Suslin conjecture that unimodular
rows over a polynomial extension of a local ring is true, then one would have
an abelian group structure on the orbit space En(R[X])Umn(R[X]). The only restriction on size is n≥3. Since
one does know the truth of the Bass–Suslin conjecture when dimension R is
3 and 2R=R (see [28], [29]); one does get E3(R[X])Um3(R[X]) has an
abelian group structure, when R is a local ring of dimension 3 in which
2 is invertible.
Is there a (perhaps A1−homotopy) interpretation of this result
from a topological point of view?
2. Linear and Symplectic group
First we collect some definitions and some known results,
and set notations which will be used throughout the paper.
Definition 2.1**.**
Special linear group* SLn(R): The subgroup of the General
linear group GLn(R), of n×n invertible matrices of determinant
1.*
Definition 2.2**.**
Elementary group* En(R): The subgroup of all matrices
of GLn(R) generated by {eij(λ):λ∈R, for i=j},
where eij(λ)=In+λEij and Eij is the
matrix with 1 on the ijth place and [math]’s elsewhere.*
Notation 2.3**.**
Let ψ1=[0−110], ψn=ψn−1⊥ψ1; and
ϕ1=[0110], ϕn=ϕn−1⊥ϕ1, for n>1.
Notation 2.4**.**
Let σ be the permutation of the natural numbers given by σ(2i)=2i−1 and σ(2i−1)=2i.
Definition 2.5**.**
Symplectic group* Sp2m(R): the group of all 2m×2m matrices
{α∈GL2m(R) ∣αtψmα=ψm}.*
Definition 2.6**.**
Elementary Symplectic group* ESp2m(R): We define for 1≤i=j≤2m, z∈R,
[TABLE]
It is easy to verify that all these matrices belong to Sp2m(R). We call them the elementary symplectic matrices
over R. The subgroup generated by them is called the elementary symplectic group and is denoted by ESp2m(R).
Definition 2.7**.**
Orthogonal group* O2m(R): the group of all 2m×2m matrices
{α∈GL2m(R) ∣αtϕmα=ϕm}.*
Definition 2.8**.**
Elementary Orthogonal group* EO2m(R): We define for 1≤i=j≤2m, z∈R,
[TABLE]
It is easy to verify that all these matrices belong to O2m(R). We call them the elementary orthogonal matrices over
R. The subgroup generated by them is called the elementary orthogonal group and is denoted by EO2m(R).
Notation 2.9**.**
Let R be a commutative ring with identity. In this paper M(n,R) will denote the set of all n×n matrices over R,
G(n,R) will denote either
the linear group GLn(R) or the symplectic group Sp2m(R) , where 2m=n. E(n,R) will denote either elementary subgroups
En(R) or elementary symplectic subgroup ESp2m(R). And, S(n,R) will denote either the special linear group
SLn(R) or the symplectic group Sp2m(R).
Convention 2.10**.**
Throughout this paper, we will assume size of the matrix is n≥3 in the linear case, n≥4 in symplectic
and n≥6 in orthogonal case, unless stated otherwise.
Lemma 2.11**.**
(L.N. Vaserstein) ([40, Lemma 5.5]) For an associative ring R with identity, and for any natural number m
[TABLE]
Remark 2.12**.**
It was observed in ([11, Lemma 2.13]) that Vaserstein’s proof actually shows that
E2m(R)e1=ESp2m(R)e1.
In view of above remark, or otherwise, one has:
Lemma 2.13**.**
([24, Chapter 1, Proposition 5.4])*
Let c=(c1,…,cn) be a unimodular row over a
semilocal ring R. Then (c1,…,cn)∈e1E(n,R); for n≥2, i.e.*
[TABLE]
The next Lemma is well-known. We include it with a proof, for completeness.
Lemma 2.14**.**
(Only for the linear and the symplectic group) Let R
be a local ring. For n≥2,S(n,R)=E(n,R), where n=2m, m is any
natural number.
Proof: For the linear case we prove the result by induction on n. When n=2, it is obvious as
SL2(R)=E2(R). For n>2,
let α∈SLn(R),
By Lemma 2.13,
[TABLE]
By induction hypothesis we have α′∈En−1(R),
thus α∈En(R).
In the symplectic case let τ∈Sp2m(R). We use the induction on m, for
m=1, SL2(R)=E2(R)=Sp2(R)=ESp2(R).
Since τe1∈E2m(R)e1, by
Lemma 2.11 (and remark following it), τe1∈ESp2m(R)e1. Let τe1=ε1e1
for some
ε1∈ESp2m(R).
Hence ε1−1τe1=e1. Therefore, we can find ε2∈ESp2m(R) such that
ε2−1ε1−1τ=I2⊥τ∗ for some τ∗∈Sp2m−2(R). By induction τ∗∈ESp2m−2(R). Repeating this process we can reduce τ to a
2×2 symplectic matrix.
\hfill□
We begin with some initial observations:
Lemma 2.15**.**
Let R be a local ring and α(X), β(X)∈S(n,R[X]). Then the commutator,
[TABLE]
Proof: Since R is a local ring, S(n,R)=E(n,R) for all n≥2, by Lemma 2.14. Thus α(0),β(0)∈E(n,R).
Let
s=α(X)α(0)−1, t=β(X)β(0)−1. Then,
[TABLE]
Since E(n,R[X]) is a normal subgroup of S(n,R[X]),
hence (tst−1α(0)ts−1t−1),
(tsβ(0)α(0)−1s−1t−1), (tβ(0)−1t−1)∈E(n,R[X]).
\hfill□
Theorem 2.16**.**
(Local-Global Principle for the Linear groups)* ([36, Theorem 3.1]) Let R be a commutative ring,
n≥3 and α∈GLn(R[X]) such that
α(0)=Id. Then α lies in En(R[X]) if and only if for every maximal ideal m of R, the
canonical image of α in GLn(Rm[X]) lies in En(Rm[X]).*
Theorem 2.17**.**
(Local-Global Principle for the Symplectic groups)*
([23, Theorem 3.6])
Let m≥2 and α(X)∈Sp2m(R[X]), with α(0)=Id. Then α(X)∈ESp2m(R[X])
if and only if for any maximal ideal m⊂R, the canonical image of α(X)∈Sp2m(Rm[X]) lies in ESp2m(Rm[X]).*
For a uniform proof of above Theorems see ([9])
Definition 2.18**.**
Let R be a ring. A matrix α∈S(n,R) is said to be
homotopic to identity if there exists a matrix γ(X)∈S(n,R[X]) such that γ(0)=Id and γ(1)=α.
Theorem 2.19**.**
Let α∈S(n,R) be homotopic to identity. Then [α,β]∈E(n,R), ∀ β∈S(n,R).
Proof: Since α is homotopic to identity, there exists γ∈S(n,R[X]) such that γ(0)=Id, γ(1)=α.
Define,
[TABLE]
Note that δ(0)=Id, and for every maximal ideal m of R,
[TABLE]
By Lemma 2.14, βm∈E(n,Rm) and since E(n,R) is normal in S(n,R),
we have δ(X)m∈E(n,Rm[X]). Thus by Theorem 2.16 (respectively Theorem 2.17),
δ(X)=[γ(X),β]∈E(n,R[X]), which implies
[TABLE]
\hfill□
Corollary 2.20**.**
Let R be a local ring. Then the group E(n,R[X])S(n,R[X]) is an abelian group.
Proof: Let α(X),β(X)∈S(n,R[X]), we need to prove that [α(X),β(X)]∈E(n,R[X]).
In view of Lemma
2.15, we may assume that α(0)=β(0)=Id.
Define, γ(X,T)=α(XT). Clearly γ(X,0)=Id and γ(X,1)=α(X); thus α(X) is
homotopic to identity.
Thus, one gets the desired result by Theorem 2.19.
\hfill□
The Relative case
Let I be an ideal of a ring R, we shall denote by GLn(R,I) the kernel of the canonical mapping
GLn(R)⟶GLn(IR). Let SLn(R,I) denotes the subgroup of GLn(R,I) of elements of determinant 1.
Definition 2.21**.**
The Relative Groups En(I), En(R,I):*
Let I be an ideal of R. The elementary group En(I) is the subgroup of En(R) generated as a group by the elements
eij(x), x∈I, 1≤i=j≤n.
The relative elementary group En(R,I) is the normal closure of En(I) in En(R).*
Definition 2.22**.**
The Relative Groups ESp2m(I), ESp2m(R,I):*
Let I be an ideal of R. The elementary symplectic group ESp2m(I) is the subgroup of ESp2m(R)
generated as a group by the
elements seij(x), x∈I, 1≤i=j≤2m.*
The relative elementary symplectic group ESp2m(R,I) is the normal closure of ESp2m(I) in ESp2m(R).
Definition 2.23**.**
The Relative Groups EO2m(I), EO2m(R,I):*
Let I be an ideal of R. The elementary orthogonal group EO2m(I) is the subgroup of EO2m(R)
generated as a group by the
elements oeij(x), x∈I, 1≤i=j≤2m.*
The relative elementary orthogonal group EO2m(R,I) is the normal closure of EO2m(I) in EO2m(R).
Notation 2.24**.**
Let R be a commutative ring with identity and I be an ideal of R. In this paper E(n,R,I) will denote either
relative elementary group En(R,I)
or relative elementary symplectic group ESp2m(R,I), and S(n,R,I) will denote either SLn(R,I) or the
relative symplectic
group Sp2m(R,I) where 2m=n.
Definition 2.25**.**
Excision Ring:*
Let R be a ring and I be an ideal of R. The excision ring R⊕I, has coordinate wise addition and multiplication
is given as follows:*
[TABLE]
The multiplicative identity of this group is (1,0) and the additive identity is (0,0).
Lemma 2.26**.**
(Anjan Gupta) (see [15, Lemma 4.3])
Let (R,m) be a local ring. Then the excision ring R⊕I with respect to a proper ideal I⊊R is
also a local ring with maximal ideal m⊕I.
Lemma 2.27**.**
Let R be a local ring and I be a proper ideal of R (i.e. I=R). Then S(n,R,I)=E(n,R,I) for all n≥1.
Proof: Let σ∈S(n,R,I), we can write σ=Id+σ′, for some σ′∈Mn(I).
Let σ∼=(Id,σ′)∈S(n,R⊕I,0⊕I). By Anjan’s Lemma, R⊕I is a
local ring, thus by Lemma
2.14,
[TABLE]
as 0⊕IR⊕I≃R is a retract of R⊕I. Thus,
[TABLE]
Now, consider the homomorphism
[TABLE]
This f induces a map
[TABLE]
Clearly,
[TABLE]
\noindent\mboxwhere, γk=f∼(βk)
\hfill□
Theorem 2.28**.**
Let R be a ring and I be a proper ideal (i.e. I=R) of R. Let α∈S(n,R,I) which is homotopic to identity relative to an extended ideal.
Then [α,β]∈E(n,R,I),∀β∈S(n,R,I).
Proof: Let α,β∈S(n,R,I) be such that α is homotopic to identity relative to an extended ideal.
We can write α=Id+α′,β=Id+β′ for some α′,β′∈Mn(I).
Let σ=[α,β]=Id+σ′ for some σ′∈Mn(I).
Let σ∼=(Id,σ′)∈S(n,R⊕I,0⊕I). In view of Theorem 2.19,
[TABLE]
as 0⊕IR⊕I≃R is a retract of R⊕I. Thus,
[TABLE]
Now, consider the homomorphism
[TABLE]
This f induces a map
[TABLE]
Clearly,
[TABLE]
\noindent\mboxwhere, γk=f∼(εk)
\hfill□
In view of the well-known Swan–Weibel homotopy trick ([24, Appendix 3]), one has:
Corollary 2.29**.**
Let A = ⨁d≥0Ad be a graded ring with augmentation ideal A+=⨁d≥1Ad.
Then E(n,A,A+)S(n,A,A+) is an abelian
group.
Proof: Consider the ring homomorphism
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Note that φ is an injective ring homomorphism. For any element α=(αij)∈S(n,A,A+),
define α(T)=(φ(αij)). Now, note that α(0)=Id and α(1)=α. Thus by
Theorem 2.28 E(n,A,A+)S(n,A,A+) is an abelian group.
\hfill□
Corollary 2.30**.**
Let A be an affine algebra of dimension d≥2 over a perfect C1 field k and (d+1)! is a unit in k
. Let σ∈SLd+1(A) be a stably elementary
matrix. Then [σ,τ]∈Ed+1(A), for all τ∈SLd+1(A).
Proof: In view of ([30, Theorem 3.4]), there exists a matrix σ(X)∈SLd+1(A[X]) with σ(0)=Id and
σ(1)=σ. Now, we are through by Theorem 2.19.
\hfill□
Corollary 2.31**.**
Let A be an affine algebra of dimension d≥3 over an algebrically closed field k and d! is a unit in k.
Then the group Ed(A)SLd(A)∩Ed+1(A) is an abelian group.
Proof: Let σ∈SLd(A)∩Ed+1(A). In view of ([14, Corollary 7.7]), σ is
homotopic to identity. Thus we are through by Theorem 2.19.
\hfill□
Corollary 2.32**.**
Let A be an affine algebra of even dimension d over a field k of cohomological dimension ≤1.
If (d+1)!A=A and 4∣d, then ESpd(A)Spd(A)∩ESpd+2(A) is an
abelian group.
Proof: Let σ∈Spd(A)∩ESpd+2(A). In view of ([10, Theorem 1]),
σ is symplectic homotopic to Id. Thus we are through by Theorem 2.19.
\hfill□
The reader should contrast the next result with the results ([30, Theorem 5.1]) and ([20, Proposition 7.10]) of W. van der Kallen.
Theorem 2.33**.**
Let A = ⨁d≥0Ad be a graded ring with augmentation ideal A+=⨁d≥1Ad.
Then for n≥3, En(A,A+)Compn(A,A+) has an abelian
group structure under matrix multiplication. In particular, for n≥3, the first row map
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
is a group homomorphism.
Proof: Since En(A,A+)SLn(A,A+) is an abelian group, it is enough to prove that matrix
multiplication gives a well defined (abelian) operation on En(A,A+)Compn(A,A+).
Let v,u∈En(A,A+)Compn(A,A+) such that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
To get a well-defined multiplication on En(A,A+)Compn(A,A+), we need
to prove that [e1αβ]=[e1α′β′]. By Corollary 2.29,
[TABLE]
\hfill□
Corollary 2.34**.**
Let A be a commutative ring and Compn(A) denote the subset of Umn(A) consisting of those unimodular rows which
can be completed
to an invertible matrix of determinant 1. If R is a local ring, then En(R[X])Compn(R[X]) has an abelian group structure ,
under matrix multiplication for n≥3.
Remark 2.35**.**
There exist examples which show that En(A,A+)Compn(A,A+) is non-trivial, for
some graded ring A:
Let R=k[X,Y,Z]/(Z7−X2−Y3), where k is C or any sufficiently
large field of characteristic =2.
It is shown in ([31], page 4) that
if B=R[T,T−1], then there is a maximal ideal m
for which NWE(Bm)=0. By ([38], Theorem 5.2 (b)) the
Vaserstein symbol E3(Bm[W])Um3(Bm[W])⟶WE(Bm[W]) is onto. Hence, there exists a unimodular row v(W)∈Um3(Bm[W])
which is not elementarily completable. However, by [29], v(W) is
completable.
Theorem 2.36**.**
(Local Global Principle for Extended Ideals)* ([3, Theorem 1.3])
Let α(X)∈G(n,R[x],I[X]) be such that α(0)=Id. If
αm(X)∈E(n,Rm[X],Im[X]) for
every maximal m of R, then α(X)∈E(n,R[X],I[X]).*
Lemma 2.37**.**
Let R be a local ring and I be a proper ideal of R (i.e. I=R). Then the group E(n,R[X],I[X])S(n,R[X],I[X]) is an abelian group.
Proof: Let α(X),β(X)∈S(n,R[X],I[X]), we need to prove that [α(X),β(X)]∈E(n,R[X],I[X]). In view of Lemma
2.15, we may assume that α(0)=β(0)=Id. Define,
[TABLE]
Note that, γ(X,0)=Id and for every maximal ideal m of R[X],
γ(X,T)m=[α(XT)m,β(X)m], by Lemma 2.27,
β(X)m∈E(n,R[X]m,I[X]m)⊆E(n,R[X]m,I[X]m[T]); and since En is normal in SLn, we have,
[TABLE]
Thus by Theorem 2.36, γ(X,T)∈E((n,R[X],I[X])[T]) which implies that
γ(X,1)=[α(X),β(X)]∈E(n,R[X],I[X]).
\hfill□
Corollary 2.38**.**
Let A be an affine algebra of dimension d over an algebrically closed field k and I=(a) be a principal ideal.
Assume (d+1)!∈k∗, d≡1 (mod 4). Then ESpd−1(A,I)Spd−1(A,I)∩ESpd+1(A,I) is an
abelian group.
Proof: Let σ∈Spd−1(A,I)∩ESpd+1(A,I). In view of ([16, Theorem 5.4]),
σ is symplectic homotopic to Id. Thus we are through by Theorem 2.19.
\hfill□
3. Transvection groups
First, we collect some definitions and some known results and set notations which will be used in this paper.
Definition 3.1**.**
Let M be a finitely generated module over a ring R. An element m of M is said to be unimodular in M if
Rm≅R and M≅Rm⊕M′,
for some R-submodule M′ of M.
Definition 3.2**.**
For an element m∈M, one can attach an ideal, called the order ideal of m in M, viz.
[TABLE]
Definition 3.3**.**
We define a transvection of a finitely generated R-module as follows: Let M be a finitely generated R-module.
Let q∈M and
f∈M∗ with f(q)=0. An automorphism of M of the form 1+fq (defined by fq(p)=f(p)q, for p∈M),
will be
called a transvection of M if either q∈Um(M) or f∈Um(M∗). We denote by
Trans(M) the subgroup of Aut(M)
generated by
transvections of M.
Definition 3.4**.**
Let M be a finitely generated R-module . The automorphisms of the form (p,a)↦(p+ax,a) and (p,a)↦(p,a+f(p)), where
x∈M and f∈M∗, are called elementary transvections of M⊕R. (Note that we can regard f as
an element of (M⊕R)∗ by defining f(0,1)=0.) By taking q=(x,0) and f∈(M⊕R)∗ such that
f:(y,t)↦t for
(y,t)∈(M⊕R), one can verify that the automorphism (p,a)↦(p+ax,a) is in Trans(M⊕R).
Similarly, by taking q=(0,1) and f∈(M⊕R)∗ such that f:(0,1)↦0 one can verify that the automorphism
(p,a)↦(p,a+f(p))
is in Trans(M⊕R).
The subgroup of Trans(M⊕R) generated by the elementary transvections is denoted by ETrans(M⊕R).
Definition 3.5**.**
A symplectic (respectively orthogonal) R-module is a pair (P,⟨,⟩), where P is a projective R-module of even rank
and ⟨,⟩:P×P⟶R is a non-degenerate alternating (respectively symmetric) bilinear form.
Definition 3.6**.**
Let (P1,⟨,⟩1) and (P2,⟨,⟩2) be two symplectic (respectively orthogonal) R-modules.
Their orthogonal sum is a pair
(P,⟨,⟩), where P=P1⊕P2 and the inner product is defined by
⟨(p1,p2),(q1,q2)⟩=⟨p1,q1⟩1+⟨p2,q2⟩2. Since this form is also non-singular
we shall henceforth denote
(P,⟨,⟩) by P1⊥P2 called the orthogonal sum
of (P1,⟨,⟩1) and (P2,⟨,⟩2) .
Definition 3.7**.**
For a projective R-module P of rank n, we define H(P) of rank 2n supported by P⊕P∗,
with form
⟨(p,f),(p′,f′)⟩=f(p′)−f′(p) for the symplectic modules and f(p′)+f′(p) for the
orthogonal modules.
Definition 3.8**.**
An isometry of a symplectic (respectively orthogonal) module (P,⟨,⟩) is an automorphism of P
which fixes the bilinear form. The
group of isometries of (P,⟨,⟩) is denoted by Sp(P) for the symplectic modules and
O(P) for the orthogonal modules.
Definition 3.9**.**
We define a symplectic transvection as follows: Let Ψ:P⟶P∗ be an induced isomorphism.
Let α:R⟶P
be a R-linear map defined by α(1)=u. Then α∗Ψ defined by α∗Ψ(p)=⟨u,p⟩
is in P∗.
Let v∈P be such that α∗Ψ(v)=⟨u,v⟩=0.
An automorphism σ(u,v) of (P,⟨,⟩) of the form
[TABLE]
for u,v∈P with ⟨u,v⟩=0 will be called a symplectic transvection of (P,⟨,⟩) if
either v∈Um(P)
or α∗Ψ∈Um(P∗). Since ⟨σ(u,v)(p(1)),σ(u,v)(p(2))⟩=⟨p1,p2⟩,σ(u,v)∈Sp(P,⟨,⟩.
Note that σ(u,v)−1(p)=p−⟨u,p⟩v−⟨v,p⟩u−⟨u,p⟩u. The subgroup of Sp(P,⟨,⟩) generated by symplectic transvections is denoted by TransSp(P).
Definition 3.10**.**
The symplectic transvections of P⊥R2 of the form
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where a,b∈R and p,q∈P, are called elementary symplectic transvections.
One can verify that above two maps belong to TransSp(P⊥R2). The subgroup of TransSp(P⊥R2)
generated by elementary symplectic transvections is denoted by ETransSp(P⊥R2).
In a similar manner we can find a transvection τ(u,v) for an orthogonal module (P,⟨,⟩).
For this we
need to assume that u,v∈P are isotropic, i.e. ⟨u,u⟩=⟨v,v⟩=0.
Definition 3.11**.**
An automorphism τ(u,v) of (P,⟨,⟩) of the form
[TABLE]
for u,v∈P with ⟨u,v⟩=⟨u,u⟩=⟨v,v⟩=0 will be called an isotropic orthogonal transvection of (P,⟨,⟩) if either
v∈Um(P) or α∗Ψ∈Um(P∗).
One can verify that τ(u,v)∈O(P,⟨,⟩)
and τ(u,v)−1(p)=p+⟨u,p⟩v−⟨v,p⟩u.
The subgroup of O(P,⟨,⟩) generated by isotropic orthogonal transvections is denoted by TransO(P).
Definition 3.12**.**
The isotropic orthogonal transvections of (P⊥R2) of the form
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where a,b∈R and p,q∈P, are called elementary orthogonal transvections.
The subgroup of TransO(P⊥R2) generated by the elementary orthogonal
transvections is denoted by ETransO(P⊥R2).
Notation 3.13**.**
In this paper P will denote either a finitely generated projective module of rank n, a symplectic module or
an orthogonal module of even rank n=2m
with a fixed form ⟨,⟩. And Q will denote P⊕R in the
linear case and P⊥R2 otherwise. We assume that n≥2, when dealing
with linear case and symplectic case and n≥4 otherwise. We use notation G(Q) to
denote Aut(Q), Sp(Q,⟨,⟩) respectively; S(Q) will denote SL(Q)={σ∈Aut(Q): ∧nσ=1},
Sp(Q,⟨,⟩) respectively; T(Q) to denote Trans(Q), TransSp(Q)
respectively; and ET(Q) to denote ETrans(Q), ETransSp(Q) respectively.
Theorem 3.14**.**
(Local-Global Principle for Transvection Groups)* ([7, Theorem 3.6]) Let R be a commutative ring with
identity and Q be as in Notation 3.13.
Suppose σ(X)∈G(Q[X]) with σ(0)=Id. If for every maximal ideal
m of R,*
[TABLE]
Then σ(X)∈ET(Q[X]).
Theorem 3.15**.**
([7, Theorem 2])*
T(Q)=ET(Q). Hence ET(Q) is normal subgroup of G(Q).*
Theorem 3.16**.**
Let σ∈S(Q) such that σ is homotopic to identity. Then [σ,τ]∈ET(Q) for all τ∈S(Q).
Proof: Since σ is homotopic to identity there exists φ(X)∈S(Q[X]) such that
φ(0)=Id and φ(1)=σ. Define
[TABLE]
Note that Ψ(0)=Id and for every maximal ideal m of R, Ψ(X)m=[φ(X)m,τm]. By Lemma 2.14, σm∈E(n+1,Rm) in
linear case and
σm∈E(n+2,Rm) in symplectic case. Since E(n,R) is normal in S(n,R)
, we have Ψ(X)m∈E(n+1,Rm[X]) in linear case and Ψ(X)m∈E(n+2,Rm[X]) in symplectic case. Thus by Theorem 3.14, Ψ(X)∈ET(Q[X]) which implies
[TABLE]
\hfill□
Corollary 3.17**.**
Let R be a commutative ring and P be a finitely generated projective R-module of rank n=2m.
Then the group ET(Q[X],(X))S(Q[X],(X)) is an abelian group.
Proof: Let σ(X), τ(X)∈S(Q[X]), we need to prove that [σ(X), τ(X)]∈ET(Q[X]).
Define,
[TABLE]
Then γ(0)=Id. For every maximal ideal m of R, by Corollary 2.20,
[σ(X)m,τ(X)m]∈E(n+1,Rm[X]) in linear case
and [σ(X)m,τ(X)m]∈E(n+2,Rm[X]) in symplectic case.
Hence by Theorem 3.14, γ(X)∈ET(Q[X],(X)).
\hfill□
Theorem 3.18**.**
(Local-Global Principle for Transvection Groups in Relative case)* ([3, Theorem 1.3]) Let R be a
commutative ring with identity and Q be as in Notation 3.13.
Suppose σ(X)∈G(Q[X],I[X]) with σ(0)=Id. If for every maximal ideal
m of R,*
[TABLE]
Then σ(X)∈ETrans(Q[X],I[X]).
Lemma 3.19**.**
Let R be a commutative ring and I be a proper ideal of R (i.e. I=R) and P be a finitely generated projective
R-module of rank n=2m.
Then the group ET(Q[X],XI[X])S(Q[X],XI[X]) is an abelian group.
Proof: Let σ(X),τ(X)∈S(Q[X],XI[X]), we need to prove that [σ(X),τ(X)]∈ET(Q[X],XI[X]).
Define,
[TABLE]
Note that, γ(0)=Id. For every maximal ideal m of R, by Lemma 2.37,
[σ(X)m,τ(X)m]∈E(n+1,Rm[X],XIm[X]) in linear case
and [σ(X)m,τ(X)m]∈E(n+2,Rm[X],XIm[X]) in symplectic case.
Thus γ(X)∈ET(Q[X],XI[X]) by Theorem 3.18.
\hfill□
4. Orthogonal groups
Throughout this section we will assume that 1/2∈R, where R is a commutative ring with identity.
Definition 4.1**.**
Lower Central Series*
Let G be a group, and define G0=G, Gn=[Gn−1,G] for n≥1. With these notations, we have*
[TABLE]
The above series of subgroups of G is called the lower central series of group G.
We say a group G is nilpotent if lower central series terminates after finitely many terms and if Gn
is the first subgroup which is trivial in the series then G is said to be nilpotent of nilpotency class n.
Definition 4.2**.**
Derived Series*
Let G be a group, and define G0=G, Gn=[Gn−1,Gn−1] for n≥1. With these notations, we have*
[TABLE]
The above series of subgroups of G is called the derived series of group G.
We say a group G is solvable if derived series terminates after finitely many terms and if Gn
is the first subgroup which is trivial in the series then G is said to be a solvable group of length n.
Definition 4.3**.**
By EOR(Q⊥H(P)) ⋅OR(H(P)) we shall mean the subset
{σ1σ2∣σ1∈EOR(Q⊥H(P)),σ2∈OR(H(P))} of OR(Q⊥H(P)).
Theorem 4.4**.**
(Local-Global Principle for the Orthogonal groups)* ([37, Theorem 4.2])
Let m≥3 and α(X)∈SO2m(R[X]), with α(0)=Id. Then α(X)∈EO2m(R[X])
if and only if for any
maximal ideal m⊂R, the canonical image of α(X) in SO2m(Rm[X])
lies in EO2m(Rm[X]).*
Lemma 4.5**.**
(R.A.Rao)$$([27, Lemma 2.2])
Let R be a ring with Jacobson dimension ≤d. Let (Q,q) be a diagonalisable quadratic R-space. Consider the
quadratic R-space Q⊥H(P), where rank P>d. Then,
[TABLE]
Definition 4.6**.**
Spinor Norm*
Suppose R be a local ring and M be an R-module and B be a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form. Let G
be the orthogonal group
corresponding to B. The spinor norm is a group homomorphism*
[TABLE]
The homomorphism is defined as follows: any element of G arising as reflection orthogonal to vector v is sent to the value
B(v,v) modulo (R∗)2. This extends to a well-define and unique homomorphism on all of G. The reflection
orthogonal to
vector v is defined as
[TABLE]
Observation 4.7**.**
One can write the matrix [u00u−1] as a product τe1−e2τe1−ue2. Hence its spinor norm
is 4u.
In view of ([22, Theorem 4]), EO2m(R) is a normal subgroup of SO2m(R) when
R is a local ring.
Lemma 4.8**.**
Let R be a local ring and I be a proper ideal of R (i.e. I=R).
If α∈SO2m(R,I), then α2∈EO2m(R,I).
Proof: Let α∈SO2m(R,I). Since α∈SO2m(R,I),
we can write α=Id+α′, for some α′∈M2m(I).
Let α∼=(Id,α′)∈SO2m(R⊕I,0⊕I).
By Lemma 2.26, R⊕I is a local ring. In view of Lemma 4.5 SO2m(R⊕I)=SO2(R⊕I)⋅EO2m(R⊕I). Since R is a commutative ring and by ([2, Lemma 3.2])
every element of
SO2(R⊕I) looks like
[TABLE]
Thus α2 looks like
[TABLE]
In view of observation 4.7, or otherwise, spinor norm of α2 is 4u2,
a square in (R⊕I)∗.
Thus by ([21, Theorem 6])
we have, α2∈EO2(R⊕I). (The details of the proof can
be found in [22].)
[TABLE]
as 0⊕IR⊕I≃R is a retract of R⊕I. Thus,
[TABLE]
Now, consider the homomorphism
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
This f induces a map
[TABLE]
Thus α2∈EO2m(R,I).
\hfill□
Corollary 4.9**.**
Let R be a local ring and I be a proper ideal of R (i.e. I=R). Then the group EO2m(R,I)SO2m(R,I) is an abelian
group for all m≥1. In fact, every element of this group is of order 2.
Lemma 4.10**.**
Let R be a local ring then the group EO2m(R)SO2m(R) is an abelian group for all m≥1. In fact,
every element of this group
is of order 2. In particular, [SO2m(R),SO2m(R)]=EO2m(R).
Proof: In view of R.A. Rao’s Lemma SO2m(R)=SO2(R)⋅EO2m(R). Every element of
SO2(R) looks like
[TABLE]
Thus SO2(R) is an abelian group which implies that EO2m(R)SO2m(R) is also an abelian group.
Since, for every element
α∈SO2(R), α2 looks like
[TABLE]
Again spinor norm of α2 is 4u2, a square in R∗.
Thus by ([21, Theorem 6])
we have, α2∈EO2(R). (The details of the proof can
be found in [22].)
\hfill□
Theorem 4.11**.**
Let R be a local ring. Then the group EO2m(R[X])SO2m(R[X]) is
a solvable group of length at most 2.
Proof: Let α(X),β(X)∈[SO2m(R[X]),SO2m(R[X])],
we need to prove [α(X),β(X)]∈EO2m(R[X]). In view of
Lemma 4.10, we may assume that α(0)=β(0)=Id.
Define,
[TABLE]
For every maximal ideal m of R[X],
[TABLE]
Since β(X)m∈[SO2m(R[X]m),SO2m(R[X]m)]=EO2m(R[X]m)
and EO2m(R[X]m)⊴SO2m(R[X]m),
thus
γ(X,T)m∈EO2m(R[X]m[T]) and γ(X,0)=Id. Thus by Theorem 4.4,
γ(X,T)∈EO2m(R[X,T]), by putting T=1, one gets γ(X,1)=[α(X),β(X)]∈EO2m(R[X]).
\hfill□
Theorem 4.12**.**
Let R be a local ring and I be a proper ideal of R (i.e. I=R). Then the group
EO2m(R[X],I[X])SO2m(R[X],I[X]) is
a solvable group of length at most 2.
Proof: Let α(X),β(X)∈[SO2m(R[X],I[X]),SO2m(R[X],I[X])],
we need to prove that [α(X),β(X)]∈EO2m(R[X],I[X]). In view of
Lemma 4.11, we may assume that α(0)=β(0)=Id.
Define,
[TABLE]
For every maximal ideal m of R[X],
[TABLE]
Since β(X)m∈[SO2m(R[X]m,I[X]m),SO2m(R[X]m,I[X]m)]=EO2m(R[X]m,I[X]m).
By ([37, Corollary 2.13]) EO2m(R[X]m,I[X]m) is normal in
SO2m(R[X]m,I[X]m),
and so
γ(X,T)m∈EO2m(R[X]m[T],I[X]m[T]). Since γ(X,0)=Id,
by Theorem 2.36,
γ(X,T)∈EO2m(R[X,T],I[X,T]), by putting T=1, one gets γ(X,1)=[α(X),β(X)]∈EO2m(R[X],I[X]).
\hfill□
Theorem 4.13**.**
Let R be a commutative ring and P be a finitely generated projective R-module of rank n=2m.
Then the group ETransO(Q[X],(X))SO(Q[X],(X)) is a solvable group of
length at most 2, for m≥2, where
Q=P⊥R2.
Proof: Let σ(X),τ(X)∈[SO(Q[X],(X)), SO(Q[X],(X))],
we need to prove that
[σ(X),τ(X)]∈ETransO(Q[X],(X)).
Define,
[TABLE]
Then γ(0)=Id. For every maximal ideal m of R, σ(X)m∈[SO2m+2(Rm[X]), SO2m+2(Rm[X])], τ(X)m∈[SO2m+2(Rm[X]), SO2m+2(Rm[X])]. In view of
Theorem 4.12, γ(X)m∈EO2m+2(Rm[X],(X)m). Now using
Theorem 3.14, we get γ(X)∈ETransO(Q[X],(X)).
\hfill□
Corollary 4.14**.**
Let R be a commutative ring and I be a proper ideal of R (i.e. I=R) and P be a finitely generated
projective R
-module of rank n=2m.
Then the group ETransO(Q[X],XI[X])SO(Q[X],XI[X]) is a solvable group of length at most 2
, for m≥2, where Q=P⊥R2.
Proof: Let σ(X),τ(X)∈[SO(Q[X],XI[X]), SO(Q[X],XI[X])],
we need to prove that [σ(X),τ(X)]∈ETransO(Q[X],XI[X]).
Define,
[TABLE]
Then γ(0)=Id. For every maximal ideal m of R, σ(X)m∈[SO2m+2(Rm[X],XIm[X]), SO2m+2(Rm[X],XIm[X])], τ(X)m∈[SO2m+2(Rm[X],XIm[X]), SO2m+2(Rm[X],XIm[X])]. In view of Theorem 4.12, γ(X)m∈EO2m+2(Rm[X],XIm[X]). Now using
Theorem 3.18 we get γ(X)∈ETransO(Q[X],XI[X]).
\hfill□
Lemma 4.15**.**
Let R be a local ring. If α(X),β(X)∈SO2m(R[X]) with α(0)=Id, then
[α(X),β(X)2]∈EO2m(R[X]).
Proof: Define,
[TABLE]
For every maximal ideal m of R[X],
[TABLE]
In view of ([21, Theorem 6]) β(X)m2∈EO2m(R[X]m)
and EO2m(R[X]m) is normal in SO2m(R[X]m),
thus
γ(X,T)m∈EO2m(R[X]m[T]) and γ(X,0)=Id. Thus by Theorem 4.4,
γ(X,T)∈EO2m(R[X,T]), by putting T=1, one gets γ(X,1)=[α(X),β(X)2]∈EO2m(R[X]).
\hfill□
Corollary 4.16**.**
Let R be a local ring. Then the group EO2m(R[X],(X))SO2m(R[X],(X)) is
a nilpotent group of class at most 2.
Proof: Let α(X)∈SO2m(R[X],(X)) and β(X)∈[SO2m(R[X],(X)),SO2m(R[X],(X))],
we need to prove that [α(X),β(X)]∈EO2m(R[X],(X)). Since in any group G, a commutator
[x,y]=xyx−1y−1=(xyx−1)2x2(x−1y−1)2 is
a product of squares. Therefore β(X) can be
written as a product of squares; and the result follows from Lemma 4.15.
We also give an alternative proof for this Corollary:
Let α(X)∈SO2m(R[X],(X)) and β(X)∈[SO2m(R[X],(X)),SO2m(R[X],(X))],
we need to prove that [α(X),β(X)]∈EO2m(R[X],(X)).
Define,
[TABLE]
For every maximal ideal m of R[X],
[TABLE]
Since β(X)m∈[SO2m(R[X]m),SO2m(R[X]m)]=EO2m(R[X]m)
and EO2m(R[X]m)⊴SO2m(R[X]m),
thus
γ(X,T)m∈EO2m(R[X]m[T]) and γ(X,0)=Id since α(0)=Id. Thus by Theorem 4.4,
γ(X,T)∈EO2m(R[X,T]), by putting T=1, one gets γ(X,1)=[α(X),β(X)]∈EO2m(R[X]).
Since γ(0,1)=Id, thus
γ(X,1)=[α(X),β(X)]∈EO2m(R[X],(X)).
\hfill□
We believe that the orthogonal quotients (in Theorem 4.11 and Theorem 4.13) are abelian groups,
we show this when the base ring
is a regular local ring containing a field.
Definition 4.17**.**
Let k be a field. A ring R is said to be essentially of finite type over k if R=S−1C, with S
is a multiplicatively
closed subset of C, and C=k[x1,…,xm]/I is a quotient ring of a polynomial ring over k.
Proposition 4.18**.**
Let R be a smooth affine algebra over a field k. If α(X)∈SO2m(R[X]) with α(0)=Id, then
α(X)∈EO2m(R[X]), for m≥3.
Proof: Let γ(X,T)=α(XT)∈SO2m(R[X,T]), then γ(X,0)=Id. Thus by homotopy invariance
(See [17], [18, Corollary 1.12], [32, Theorem 9.8].) we have γ(X,1)=α(X)∈EO2m(R[X]). (The reader may also consult [13] for a version which is
suitable for this application.) (There is a version for reductive groups
in [33] which may be of independent interest.)
\hfill□
The following Lemma is well known:
Lemma 4.19**.**
Let R ba an affine algebra over a field k. Suppose Rp is regular local ring for some p∈Spec(R). Then there
exists s∈/p such that Rs is a regular ring.
Proof: Let J be the Jacobian ideal R. Then V(J)=Sing(R). Since Rp is regular local ring,
J⊈p. Choose
s∈J\p.
Now for every q∈Spec(R) with s∈/q, we have J⊈q. Since every prime
ideal of Rs looks like qs, for some q∈Spec(R) with s∈/q,
we get (Rs)qs=Rq is a regular local ring. Hence Rs is a regular ring.
\hfill□
Theorem 4.20**.**
Let R be a regular local ring essentially of finite type over a field k.
If σ(X)∈SO2m(R[X]), with σ(0)=Id,
then σ(X)∈EO2m(R[X]), for m≥3.
Proof: In view of Lemma 4.19, for every p∈Spec(R) there exists s∈R\p
such that Rs is a smooth algebra.
Therefore, by Proposition 4.18, σs(X)∈EO2m(Rs[X]), which implies
σp(X)∈EO2m(Rp[X]). Now, by Theorem 4.4 we have
σ(X)∈EO2m(R[X]).
\hfill□
Corollary 4.21**.**
Let R be a geometric regular local ring containing a field. Then the group EO2m(R[X])SO2m(R[X])
is an abelian group for
m≥3.
Proof: Let α(X),β(X)∈SO2m(R[X]), we need to prove that [α(X),β(X)]∈EO2m(R[X]).
Define,
[TABLE]
We will proceed by induction on dim R. If dimR=0, then R is a field and the result follows
from Proposition 4.18. Therefore
we assume dimR≥1. In [25], D. Popescu showed that if R is a geometric
regular local ring then it is a filtered inductive limit
of regular local rings essentially of finite type over a field.
Clearly, γ(0)=Id. Hence by Theorem 4.20,
γ(X)∈EO2m(R[X]). Now, using Lemma 4.10, we get
[α(X),β(X)]∈EO2m(R[X]).
\hfill□
Acknowledgement: We thank the referee for his suggestions, indicating
a proof of Corollary 2.29, and for a quick review.