On the small cyclic torsion of elliptic curves over cubic number fields
Jian Wang

TL;DR
This paper investigates the possible cyclic torsion subgroups of elliptic curves over cubic number fields, establishing non-existence results for certain torsion orders based on Merel's uniform boundedness theorem.
Contribution
It provides new non-existence results for specific cyclic torsion subgroups of elliptic curves over cubic fields, extending the classification of torsion structures.
Findings
$ ext{Z}/49 ext{Z}$, $ ext{Z}/40 ext{Z}$, $ ext{Z}/25 ext{Z}$, and $ ext{Z}/22 ext{Z}$ are not subgroups of $E(K)_{tor}$ over any cubic field $K$.
The results rely on bounds derived from Merel's theorem for elliptic curves over number fields.
The paper advances the understanding of torsion subgroup possibilities over cubic number fields.
Abstract
Merel's result on the strong uniform boundedness conjecture made it meaningful to classify the torsion part of the Mordell-Weil groups of all elliptic curves defined over number fields of fixed degree . In this paper, we discuss the cyclic torsion subgroup of elliptic curves over cubic number fields. For or , we show that is not a subgroup of for any elliptic curve over a cubic number field .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Geometric and Algebraic Topology
On the small cyclic torsion of elliptic curves over cubic number fields.
Jian Wang
College of Mathematics
Jilin Normal University
Siping, Jilin 136000, China
(Date: March 12, 2024)
Abstract.
Merel’s result on the strong uniform boundedness conjecture made it meaningful to classify the torsion part of the Mordell-Weil groups of all elliptic curves defined over number fields of fixed degree . In this paper, we discuss the cyclic torsion subgroup of elliptic curves over cubic number fields. For or , we show that is not a subgroup of for any elliptic curve over a cubic number field .
Key words and phrases:
torsion subgroup, elliptic curves, modular curves
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
11G05,11G18
1. Introduction
In 1996, Merel [16] finally proved the strong uniform boundedness conjecture for elliptic curves over number fields.
Theorem 1.1** (Merel).**
For every positive integer , there exists an integer such that for every number field of degree and every elliptic curve over , we always have
[TABLE]
Merel’s result made it meaningful to classify the torsion part of the Mordell-Weil groups of all elliptic curves defined over number fields of fixed degree . The case was solved by Mazur [15] and Kubert [12]. The case was solved by Kamienny [8], Kenku and Momose [11].
In [20], we proposed the aim of restricting the size of cyclic torsion subgroup of elliptic curves over cubic number fields. In that paper, six out of twenty four composite integers were ruled out with the help of the Kamienny’s criterion. In this paper, we discuss several cases in the list of 24 which are too small to apply Kamienny’s criterion.
The main result of this paper is the following:
Theorem 1.2**.**
If or , then is not a subgroup of for any elliptic curve over a cubic number field .
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we omit the background materials which were covered in section 2 of [20]. Readers who are interested may switch there.
Let be a positive integer. Let (resp. ) be the modular curve defined over associated to the congruence subgroup (resp. ). We denote by , the corresponding affine curves. Denote by (resp. ) the jacobian of (resp. ).
For a modular curve , let be the -th symmetric power of . Define
[TABLE]
by where is the jacobian of , and denotes the divisor class. Let denote the gonality of . The following generalization of proposition 1(i) in Frey [4], which was proved in [20], is also necessary in section 3.
Lemma 2.1** (Frey).**
Assume that and is a finite extension of . Then is injective.
In this paper, we are interested in the gonality of the modular curves . Since the 1-gonal curves are precisely the curves of genus 0, then is 1-gonal if and only if is among the eleven values with genus 0. The complete lists of 2-gonal and 3-gonal ones were determined by Ishii-Momose [6] and Jeon-Kim-Schweizer [7].
Proposition 2.2** (Ishii-Momose).**
The modular curve is 2-gonal if and only if is one of the following:
[TABLE]
Proposition 2.3** (Jeon-Kim-Schweizer).**
The modular curve is 3-gonal if and only if is one of the following:
[TABLE]
Any noncuspidal point of is represented by , where is an elliptic curve and is a point of order . Any noncuspidal point of is represented by , where is an elliptic curve and is a cyclic subgroup of order . The map sends to , where is the cyclic subgroup generated by .
Let be a prime such that . Igusa’s theorem [5] says that the modular curves and have good reduction at prime . The following theorem of Serre and Milne says that reducing the modular curve is compatible with reducing the modular interpretation.
Theorem 2.4** (Serre-Milne).**
[18, Theorem 1]** Any point of or , rational over a field (of characteristic not dividing ), is represented by a -rational pair (i.e. is defined over , and is rational over , or is a group rational over ), and conversely.
Let be a number field with ring of integers , a prime ideal lying above , its residue field. Let be an elliptic curve over and a point of order . Let be the fibre over of the Néron model of , and let be the reduction of . The following well-known but rarely mentioned theorem [20, Proposition 2.5] shows that has order when .
Theorem 2.5**.**
Let be a positive integer relatively prime to . Then the reduction map
[TABLE]
is injective.
Let be the finite field with elements. Let be an elliptic curve over . Let be the number of points of over . Then Hasse’s theorem states that
[TABLE]
i.e.
[TABLE]
Let , is called ordinary if , otherwise it is called supersingular. In the range proposed by Hasse’s theorem, all the ordinary appear, while the supersingular only appears in restricted case. This was determined by Waterhouse [21, Theorem 4.1]:
Proposition 2.6** (Waterhouse).**
*The isogeny classes of elliptic curves over are in one-to-one correspondence with the rational integers having and satisfying one of the following conditions:
(1) ;
(2) If is even: ;
(3) If is even and : ;
(4) If is odd and or : ;
(5) If either (i) is odd or (ii) is even and : .*
3. Method
The following Theorem states that the jacobian decomposes to a direct sum of modular abelian varieties.
Theorem 3.1**.**
[2, Theorem 6.6.6]** The jacobian is isogenous to a direct sum of abelian varieties (over ) associated to equavalence classes of newforms
[TABLE]
with newforms of divisor level.
The -series of coincides, up to a finite number of Euler factors, with the product
[TABLE]
where runs through embeddings with the number field of (See [19, §7.5]). The following proposition is a special case of Corollary 14.3 in Kato [9]:
Proposition 3.2**.**
Let be an abelian variety over such that there is a surjective homomorphism for some . If , then is finite.
The decomposition of and the non-vanishing of the -series at of modular abelian varieties can be calculated in Magma [13]. If for all , then we know is finite for all , therefore is finite. For the in the list in [20], Table 1 is the result of calculations in Magma. The second column is the number of non-isogenous modular abelian varieties in the decompositon . The third column list the dimension and multiplicity of each (we omit if ). The fourth column verifies vanishing of -series at ( means and means ). It is easy to see is finite for the ’s in Table 1 except .
In the proof of Lemma 3.5, we use a specialization lemma in Appendix of Katz [10] and a theorem of Manin [14] and Drinfeld [3].
Lemma 3.3** (Specialization Lemma).**
Let be a number field. Let be a prime above . Let be an abelian variety. Suppose the ramification index . Then the reduction map
[TABLE]
is injective.
Theorem 3.4** (Manin-Drinfeld).**
Let be a congruence subgroup. and the images of and respectively, on . Then the class of divisors on curve has finite order.
Lemma 3.5**.**
Suppose such that , is finite, is a prime not dividing . Let be a number field of degree over and a prime of over . Let be an elliptic curve with a -rational point of order , i.e. . Then has good reduction at .
Proof.
Suppose has additive reduction at , then with and with . Since is a -rational point of order in , then divides , which is impossible under our assumption.
Suppose has multiplicative reduction at , i.e. specializes to a cusp of . Then is also a cubic field with prime ideal over and residue field . And also has multiplicative reduction at . This means all the images of specialize to cusps of . Let be the cusps such that
[TABLE]
We know all the cusps of are defined over [17]. Let be a prime in over . It is an elementary fact in algebraic number theory that ramifies in if and only if , so under our assumption . So by Lemma 3.3, the specialization map
[TABLE]
is injective.
Since , then by Lemma 2.1, the map
[TABLE]
is injective.
We know is -rational and is finite, so is in . By Theorem 3.4, the difference of two cusps of has finite order in . So is also in . Therefore implies since is injective. This is a contradiction because we assume is a noncuspidal point.
Therefore has good reduction at . ∎
4. Proof of Theorem 1.2
4.1.
As is seen in Table 1, is finite. By Proposition 2.2 and 2.3, we know . Let be a cubic field and a prime of over . Suppose . Therefore by Lemma 3.5, has good reduction at . By Theorem 2.5, the reduction of is a -rational point of order in the elliptic curve over .
But can not have a point of order since . This is a contradiction. So is not a subgroup of .
4.2.
As is seen in Table 1, is finite. By Proposition 2.2 and 2.3, we know . Let be a cubic field and a prime of over . Suppose . Therefore by Lemma 3.5, has good reduction at . By Theorem 2.5, the reduction of is a -rational point of order in the elliptic curve over .
If or , then can not have a point of order since . If , suppose has a point of order , then since for any . But by Theorem 2.6, ( for , for ). This is a contradiction. So is not a subgroup of .
Acknowledgements
We thank Sheldon Kamienny for providing many valuable ideas and insightful comments.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1]
- 2[2] Diamond, F., Shurman, J.: A first course in modular forms. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 228. Springer-Verlag, New York (2005)
- 3[3] Drinfeld, V. G.: Two theorems on modular curves. (Russian) Funkcional. Anal. i Priložen. 7, no. 2, 83-84 (1973)
- 4[4] Frey, G.: Curves with infinitely many points of fixed degree. Israel J. Math. 85, no. 1-3, 79-83 (1994)
- 5[5] Igusa, J.: Kroneckerian model of fields of elliptic modular functions. Amer. J. Math. 81, 561-577 (1959)
- 6[6] Ishii, N., Momose, F.: Hyperelliptic modular curves. Tsukuba J. Math. 15, no. 2, 413-423 (1991)
- 7[7] Jeon, D., Kim, C. H., Schweizer, A.: On the torsion of elliptic curves over cubic number fields. Acta Arith. 113, no. 3, 291-301 (2004)
- 8[8] Kamienny, S.: Torsion points on elliptic curves and q-coefficients of modular forms. Invent. Math. 109, no. 2, 221-229 (1992)
