# Bounds on the rise of total cross section from LHC7 and LHC8 data

**Authors:** D.A. Fagundes, M.J. Menon, P.V.R.G. Silva

arXiv: 1703.07486 · 2017-07-11

## TL;DR

This paper develops analytical models to analyze proton-proton total cross section data from LHC7 and LHC8, aiming to understand discrepancies and establish bounds on the energy dependence of the cross section rise.

## Contribution

The study introduces new fits using a Reggeon and Pomeron model with a free parameter gamma to quantify the rise of the total cross section at high energies, considering different data ensembles.

## Key findings

- Data from TOTEM and ATLAS can be fitted separately with good agreement.
- The parameter gamma indicating the rise is approximately 2.1, with bounds between 1.8 and 2.4.
- Fixed gamma=2 fits are also consistent with the data.

## Abstract

Recent measurements of the proton-proton total cross section $\sigma_{tot}$ at 7 and 8 TeV by the TOTEM and ATLAS Collaborations are characterized by some discrepant values: the TOTEM data suggest a rise of the cross section with the energy faster than the ATLAS data. Attempting to quantify these different behaviors, we develop new analytical fits to $\sigma_{tot}$ and $\rho$ data from $pp$ and $\bar{p}p$ scattering in the energy region 5 GeV - 8 TeV. The dataset comprises all the accelerator data below 7 TeV and we consider three ensembles by adding: either only the TOTEM data (T), or only the ATLAS data (A), or both sets (T+A). For the purposes, we use our previous RRPL$\gamma$ parametrization for $\sigma_{tot}(s)$, consisting of two Reggeons (RR), one critical Pomeron (P) and a leading log-raised-to-gamma (L$\gamma$) contribution (with $\gamma$ as a free fit parameter), analytically connected to $\rho(s)$ through singly-subtracted derivative dispersion relations and energy scale fixed at the physical threshold. The data reductions with ensembles T and A present good agreement with the experimental data analyzed and cannot be distinguished on statistical grounds. The quality of the fit is not as good with ensemble T+A. The fit results provide $\gamma \sim 2.3 \pm 0.1$ (T), $2.0 \pm 0.2$ (A), $2.1 \pm 0.2$ (T+A), with $\chi^2/\mathrm{DOF} \sim 1.07$ (T), $1.09$ (A), $1.14$ (T+A), suggesting extrema bounds for $\gamma$ given by 1.8 and 2.4. Fits with $\gamma = 2$ (fixed) are also developed and discussed.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.07486/full.md

## Figures

11 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.07486/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.07486/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.07486