# Are two nucleons bound in lattice QCD for heavy quark masses? --   Consistency check with L\"uscher's finite volume formula --

**Authors:** Takumi Iritani, Sinya Aoki, Takumi Doi, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Yoichi Ikeda,, Takashi Inoue, Noriyoshi Ishii, Hidekatsu Nemura, Kenji Sasaki

arXiv: 1703.07210 · 2017-09-06

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a consistency check based on L"uscher's finite volume formula to evaluate claims of nucleon-nucleon bound states in lattice QCD at heavy quark masses, revealing inconsistencies and raising doubts about previous findings.

## Contribution

It provides a novel sanity check method for lattice QCD data on nucleon-nucleon interactions, exposing potential inaccuracies in prior claims of bound states at heavy quark masses.

## Key findings

- Some lattice data show inconsistency with effective range expansion.
- Certain data exhibit singular behavior of low energy parameters.
- Other data have unphysical residues for bound state poles.

## Abstract

On the basis of the L\"uscher's finite volume formula, a simple test (consistency check or sanity check) is introduced and applied to inspect the recent claims of the existence of the nucleon-nucleon ($NN$) bound state(s) for heavy quark masses in lattice QCD. We show that the consistency between the scattering phase shifts at $k^2 > 0$ and/or $k^2 < 0$ obtained from the lattice data and the behavior of phase shifts from the effective range expansion (ERE) around $k^2=0$ exposes the validity of the original lattice data, otherwise such information is hidden in the energy shift $\Delta E$ of the two nucleons on the lattice. We carry out this sanity check for all the lattice results in the literature claiming the existence of the $NN$ bound state(s) for heavy quark masses, and find that (i) some of the $NN$ data show clear inconsistency between the behavior of ERE at $k^2 > 0$ and that at $k^2 < 0$, (ii) some of the $NN$ data exhibit singular behavior of the low energy parameter (such as the divergent effective range) at $k^2<0$, (iii) some of the $NN$ data have the unphysical residue for the bound state pole in S-matrix, and (iv) the rest of the $NN$ data are inconsistent among themselves. Furthermore, we raise a caution of using the ERE in the case of the multiple bound states. Our finding, together with the fake plateau problem previously pointed out by the present authors, brings a serious doubt on the existence of the $NN$ bound states for pion masses heavier than 300 MeV in the previous studies.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.07210/full.md

## Figures

57 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.07210/full.md

## References

53 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.07210/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.07210