# Swift monitoring of NGC 4151: Evidence for a Second X-ray/UV   Reprocessing

**Authors:** R. Edelson, J. Gelbord, E. Cackett, S. Connolly, C. Done, M., Fausnaugh, E. Gardner, N. Gehrels, M. Goad, K. Horne, I. McHardy, B. M., Peterson, S. Vaughan, M. Vestergaard, A. Breeveld, A. J. Barth, M. Bentz, M., Bottorff, W. N. Brandt, S. M. Crawford, E. Dalla Bonta, D. Emmanoulopoulos,, P. Evans, R. Figuera Jaimes, A. V. Filippenko, G. Ferland, D. Grupe, M., Joner, J. Kennea, K. T. Korista, H. A. Krimm, G. Kriss, D. C. Leonard, S., Mathur, H. Netzer, J. Nousek, K. Page, E. Romero-Colmenero, M. Siegel, D. A., Starkey, T. Treu, H. A. Vogler, H. Winkler, W. Zheng

arXiv: 1703.06901 · 2017-05-10

## TL;DR

This study uses Swift observations of NGC 4151 to analyze X-ray and UV/optical variability, revealing complex reprocessing behavior inconsistent with simple models and supporting a two-stage reprocessing scenario.

## Contribution

It provides detailed, multi-band light curves and evidence for a two-stage reprocessing model in NGC 4151, challenging the traditional lamp-post paradigm.

## Key findings

- Hard X-ray bands are strongly correlated with no lag.
- UV/optical bands lag X-rays by 3-4 days.
- UV leads optical by 0.5-1 day.

## Abstract

Swift monitoring of NGC 4151 with ~6 hr sampling over a total of 69 days in early 2016 is used to construct light curves covering five bands in the X-rays (0.3-50 keV) and six in the ultraviolet (UV)/optical (1900-5500 A). The three hardest X-ray bands (>2.5 keV) are all strongly correlated with no measurable interband lag while the two softer bands show lower variability and weaker correlations. The UV/optical bands are significantly correlated with the X-rays, lagging ~3-4 days behind the hard X-rays. The variability within the UV/optical bands is also strongly correlated, with the UV appearing to lead the optical by ~0.5-1 day. This combination of >~3 day lags between the X-rays and UV and <~1 day lags within the UV/optical appears to rule out the "lamp-post" reprocessing model in which a hot, X-ray emitting corona directly illuminates the accretion disk, which then reprocesses the energy in the UV/optical. Instead, these results appear consistent with the Gardner & Done picture in which two separate reprocessings occur: first, emission from the corona illuminates an extreme-UV-emitting toroidal component that shields the disk from the corona; this then heats the extreme-UV component which illuminates the disk and drives its variability.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06901/full.md

## Figures

24 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06901/full.md

## References

71 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06901/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06901