# Gamma Ray Burst afterglow and prompt-afterglow relations: an overview

**Authors:** Maria Dainotti, Roberta Del Vecchio

arXiv: 1703.06876 · 2017-05-16

## TL;DR

This paper reviews the current understanding of the relationships between prompt and afterglow emissions in Gamma Ray Bursts, emphasizing their potential to serve as cosmological tools after correcting for biases.

## Contribution

It provides a comprehensive overview of GRB relations, their physical interpretations, and discusses how correcting for biases can improve their use in cosmology.

## Key findings

- GRB relations can help discriminate between theoretical models.
- Correcting for selection biases is crucial for using GRBs as standard candles.
- Current relations require further refinement for cosmological applications.

## Abstract

The mechanism responsible for the afterglow emission of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) and its connection to the prompt $\gamma$-ray emission is still a debated issue. Relations between intrinsic properties of the prompt or afterglow emission can help to discriminate between plausible theoretical models of GRB production. Here we present an overview of the afterglow and prompt-afterglow two parameter relations, their physical interpretations, their use as redshift estimators and as possible cosmological tools. A similar task has already been correctly achieved for Supernovae (SNe) Ia by using the peak magnitude-stretch relation, known in the literature as the Phillips relation \citep{phillips93}. The challenge today is to make GRBs, which are amongst the farthest objects ever observed, standardizable candles as the SNe Ia through well established and robust relations. Thus, the study of relations amongst the observable and physical properties of GRBs is highly relevant together with selection biases in their physical quantities. Therefore, we describe the state of the art of the existing GRB relations, their possible and debated interpretations in view of the current theoretical models and how relations are corrected for selection biases. We conclude that only after an appropriate evaluation and correction for selection effects can GRB relations be used to discriminate among the theoretical models responsible for the prompt and afterglow emission and to estimate cosmological parameters.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06876/full.md

## Figures

126 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06876/full.md

## References

158 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06876/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06876