# Near-optimal bounds for phase synchronization

**Authors:** Yiqiao Zhong, Nicolas Boumal

arXiv: 1703.06605 · 2018-04-10

## TL;DR

This paper proves near-optimal theoretical bounds for phase synchronization, showing that certain algorithms succeed in noisy settings with higher noise levels than previously confirmed, and introduces new analysis techniques.

## Contribution

It establishes tightness of SDP and convergence of GPM for higher noise levels, extending prior results, and develops novel techniques for analyzing iterative algorithms in phase synchronization.

## Key findings

- SDP is tight for noise level up to rac{ n}{ log n}
- GPM converges to the global optimum under the same noise regime
- A linear convergence rate for GPM and tighter __ bounds for MLE

## Abstract

The problem of phase synchronization is to estimate the phases (angles) of a complex unit-modulus vector $z$ from their noisy pairwise relative measurements $C = zz^* + \sigma W$, where $W$ is a complex-valued Gaussian random matrix. The maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) is a solution to a unit-modulus constrained quadratic programming problem, which is nonconvex. Existing works have proposed polynomial-time algorithms such as a semidefinite relaxation (SDP) approach or the generalized power method (GPM) to solve it. Numerical experiments suggest both of these methods succeed with high probability for $\sigma$ up to $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{1/2})$, yet, existing analyses only confirm this observation for $\sigma$ up to $\mathcal{O}(n^{1/4})$. In this paper, we bridge the gap, by proving SDP is tight for $\sigma = \mathcal{O}(\sqrt{n /\log n})$, and GPM converges to the global optimum under the same regime. Moreover, we establish a linear convergence rate for GPM, and derive a tighter $\ell_\infty$ bound for the MLE. A novel technique we develop in this paper is to track (theoretically) $n$ closely related sequences of iterates, in addition to the sequence of iterates GPM actually produces. As a by-product, we obtain an $\ell_\infty$ perturbation bound for leading eigenvectors. Our result also confirms intuitions that use techniques from statistical mechanics.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06605/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06605/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06605/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06605