# On Piercing Numbers of Families Satisfying the $(p,q)_r$ Property

**Authors:** Chaya Keller, Shakhar Smorodinsky

arXiv: 1703.06338 · 2017-03-21

## TL;DR

This paper improves asymptotic upper bounds on the piercing number for families of convex sets satisfying a refined intersection property, especially when only a small fraction of q-tuples intersect, using combinatorial and geometric tools.

## Contribution

It provides new asymptotic upper bounds for the $(p,q)_r$ property, refining previous bounds and approaching known lower bounds for the piercing number.

## Key findings

- Established that $HD_d(p,q)_r \
- for large $p,q$, with $r$ depending on $p,q,d$
- Bounded the piercing number close to the lower bound, missing by less than $pq^d$.

## Abstract

The Hadwiger-Debrunner number $HD_d(p,q)$ is the minimal size of a piercing set that can always be guaranteed for a family of compact convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ that satisfies the $(p,q)$ property. Hadwiger and Debrunner showed that $HD_d(p,q) \geq p-q+1$ for all $q$, and equality is attained for $q > \frac{d-1}{d}p +1$. Almost tight upper bounds for $HD_d(p,q)$ for a `sufficiently large' $q$ were obtained recently using an enhancement of the celebrated Alon-Kleitman theorem, but no sharp upper bounds for a general $q$ are known.   In [L. Montejano and P. Sober\'{o}n, Piercing numbers for balanced and unbalanced families, Disc. Comput. Geom., 45(2) (2011), pp. 358-364], Montejano and Sober\'{o}n defined a refinement of the $(p,q)$ property: $F$ satisfies the $(p,q)_r$ property if among any $p$ elements of $F$, at least $r$ of the $q$-tuples intersect. They showed that $HD_d(p,q)_r \leq p-q+1$ holds for all $r>{{p}\choose{q}}-{{p+1-d}\choose{q+1-d}}$; however, this is far from being tight.   In this paper we present improved asymptotic upper bounds on $HD_d(p,q)_r$ which hold when only a tiny portion of the $q$-tuples intersect. In particular, we show that for $p,q$ sufficiently large, $HD_d(p,q)_r \leq p-q+1$ holds with $r = \frac{1}{p^{\frac{q}{2d}}}{{p}\choose{q}}$. Our bound misses the known lower bound for the same piercing number by a factor of less than $pq^d$.   Our results use Kalai's Upper Bound Theorem for convex sets, along with the Hadwiger-Debrunner theorem and the recent improved upper bound on $HD_d(p,q)$ mentioned above.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06338/full.md

## References

9 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06338/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.06338