A unified treatment of multiple testing with prior knowledge using the p-filter
Aaditya Ramdas, Rina Foygel Barber, Martin J. Wainwright, Michael I., Jordan

TL;DR
The paper introduces p-filter, a unified algorithmic framework that incorporates various types of prior knowledge into multiple testing procedures to improve power and control FDR.
Contribution
It presents a novel, unified framework that simultaneously integrates multiple forms of prior knowledge into multiple testing, recovering existing algorithms as special cases.
Findings
p-filter effectively combines prior knowledge types (a)-(d).
It improves testing power while controlling FDR.
The framework generalizes several existing methods.
Abstract
There is a significant literature on methods for incorporating knowledge into multiple testing procedures so as to improve their power and precision. Some common forms of prior knowledge include (a) beliefs about which hypotheses are null, modeled by non-uniform prior weights; (b) differing importances of hypotheses, modeled by differing penalties for false discoveries; (c) multiple arbitrary partitions of the hypotheses into (possibly overlapping) groups; and (d) knowledge of independence, positive or arbitrary dependence between hypotheses or groups, suggesting the use of more aggressive or conservative procedures. We present a unified algorithmic framework called p-filter for global null testing and false discovery rate (FDR) control that allows the scientist to incorporate all four types of prior knowledge (a)-(d) simultaneously, recovering a variety of known algorithms as special…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
