A translation of A.A.Vinogradov's "On the free product of ordered groups"
Victoria Lebed, Arnaud Mortier

TL;DR
This paper translates Vinogradov's 1949 work demonstrating that the free product of two ordered groups can be endowed with an order, extending the understanding of ordered group constructions.
Contribution
It provides the first English translation of Vinogradov's proof that free products of ordered groups are themselves orderable.
Findings
Proves free products of ordered groups are orderable
Includes minor corrections to the original proof
Highlights significance for ordered group theory
Abstract
This is a translation from Russian of the article by A.A.Vinogradov: On the free product of ordered groups, Mat. Sb. (N.S.), 1949, Volume 25(67), Number 1, 163-168. The main result is that the free product of two ordered groups is orderable. Minor corrections were made and highlighted in footnotes.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Mathematics and Applications · graph theory and CDMA systems
On the free product of ordered groups
A. A. Vinogradov Published in Mat. Sb. (N.S.), 1949, Volume 25(67), Number 1, 163–168. Translated from Russian by Victoria Lebed and Arnaud Mortier.
One of the fundamental questions of the theory of ordered groups is what abstract groups are orderable. E. P. Shimbireva [2] showed that a free group on any set of generators can be ordered. This leads to the following problem: under what conditions is it possible to order a free product of arbitrary groups?
Using the matrix presentation method for groups proposed by Malcev [1], in the present work we establish the orderability of a free product of arbitrary ordered groups.
Definition 1**.**
An ordered group is a group endowed with a relation , satisfying the following conditions:
For any elements and of the group either , or , or . 2. 2.
If and , then . 3. 3.
If , then for any elements and of the group.
Definition 2**.**
An ordered ring (field) is a ring (field) such that:
the additive group of the ring (field) is ordered, and 2. 2.
for any elements , , of the ring (field),
[TABLE]
Definition 3**.**
The group algebra of a group over a field is the algebra whose elements are formal finite linear combinations of elements of with coefficients in . These sums are multiplied and added in the usual way. A group algebra has the obvious unit , where is the identity element of and the unit of .
Lemma 1**.**
If is an ordered field and an ordered group, then is orderable.
Proof.
Let and be elements of under the conditions of the lemma. Then they can be written as
[TABLE]
where some of the and might be zero, and . We set if for some ,
[TABLE]
It is easy to check that the conditions from Definition 2 hold. ∎
We call a triangular matrix any matrix, finite or infinite, with zeroes under the main diagonal.
Lemma 2**.**
The set of all triangular matrices with entries in an ordered unital ring, and with every element on the main diagonal positive and invertible, is an orderable group.
Proof.
Triangular matrices of the form described in the statement clearly form a group. Let and be such matrices. We will call preceding entries to a given entry , those111Translators’ note: we believe that there is a mistake here, should probably be replaced with . located to the right of or on the main diagonal, for which
[TABLE]
Say that if either of the following conditions holds:
- •
for , and for some ,
- •
for some , and their preceding entries coincide.
One easily checks that the conditions of Definition 1 are satisfied. ∎
Lemma 3**.**
The direct product of two ordered groups is orderable.
Proof.
Let and be ordered groups. Say that in if either , or and . It is easy to check that the conditions from Definition 1 hold.∎
We denote by the direct product of two ordered groups and . A pair of the form where is the identity of will be denoted simply by , and a pair of the form where is the identity of will be denoted by .
Consider now the following transcendental triangular matrix:
[TABLE]
We denote by the free abelian group generated by the entries of . This group is orderable (see [2] and references therein). By Lemma 1, the group algebra is orderable, and thus has no zero divisors. The field of fractions of this algebra is also orderable [3]. Consider the group algebra , where as above. According to Lemmas 1 and 3, the algebra is orderable.
Lemma 4**.**
Consider the diagonal matrix
[TABLE]
where is the unit of and is neither [math] nor . Then every entry of the matrix located to the right of or on the main diagonal is non-zero.
Proof.
Put and . Clearly222 Translators’ note: we corrected the last term of the formula given for . Note also that this formula holds only for , as . As a result, the very last formula of this proof is slightly incorrect when is odd, but the main point—that the coefficient of is not [math]—seems to hold true after all.,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
From this follows:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where the external sums are over all odd integers between and . This equality shows that the coefficient of in is non-zero, and so . ∎
Theorem**.**
The free product of two ordered groups can be endowed with a group order whose restriction to each factor is the original order.
Proof.
Consider, together with the triangular matrix introduced before, the following transcendental triangular matrices:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Let and be ordered groups. As before, we construct an algebra with , where now the free abelian group is generated by the set of all formal entries not only of , but also of , , and . To every we associate the diagonal matrix
[TABLE]
and to every the diagonal matrix
[TABLE]
Clearly the two sets of matrices and form groups naturally isomorphic to and respectively.
Put and . We are going to show that the representations of and given by and induce a faithful representation of the free product , that is, given elements of of type
[TABLE]
the corresponding matrices
[TABLE]
are not the identity matrix. We will write down the proof for only, as the three remaining cases are similar.
Every entry of the matrix is equal to , where is an entry of , and and are diagonal entries of the matrices and . Similarly, , where is an entry of , and and are diagonal entries of the matrices and .
By Lemma 4, every matrix in the groups and different from the identity matrix has only non-zero entries to the right of or on the main diagonal. The entries of the matrix are given by
[TABLE]
Here . This sum can be regarded as a polynomial in the diagonal entries of , and of their inverses. The coefficients of this polynomial are products of entries of the matrices . Observe that no monomial occurs twice in the sum as it is given. Moreover, every coefficient is non-zero, since it is a product of non-zero elements of the algebra , which has no zero divisors.
Therefore, we have a faithful representation of the free product , given by
[TABLE]
Every diagonal entry of is either the unit of or a positive invertible element of distinct from the unit. It follows then from Lemma 2 that all matrices of all four types together form an orderable group. Therefore, the free product is orderable. ∎
The proof presented here for two factors obviously works for any number of factors.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] A. Malcev. On isomorphic matrix representations of infinite groups. Rec. Math. [Mat. Sbornik] N.S. , 8 (50):405–422, 1940.
- 2[2] H. Shimbireva. On the theory of partially ordered groups. Rec. Math. [Mat. Sbornik] N.S. , 20(62):145–178, 1947.
- 3[3] B. L. van der Waerden. Modern Algebra. Vol. I . M.–L., 1934.
