# Reconsidering the gold open access citation advantage postulate in a   multidisciplinary context: an analysis of the subject categories in the Web   of Science database 2009-2014

**Authors:** Pablo Dorta-Gonzalez, Sara M. Gonzalez-Betancor, Maria Isabel, Dorta-Gonzalez

arXiv: 1703.03220 · 2017-03-10

## TL;DR

This study analyzes the citation impact of gold open access articles across multiple disciplines from 2009 to 2014, finding no consistent evidence of a citation advantage at article or journal level.

## Contribution

It provides a comprehensive longitudinal analysis of gold OA citation impact across all disciplines in Web of Science, challenging the assumption of a universal citation advantage.

## Key findings

- No generalizable gold OA citation advantage found.
- Citation impact varies across disciplines and over time.
- Impact factors of OA journals do not consistently surpass non-OA journals.

## Abstract

Since Lawrence in 2001 proposed the open access (OA) citation advantage, the potential benefit of OA in relation to the citation impact has been discussed in depth. The methodology to test this postulate ranges from comparing the impact factors of OA journals versus traditional ones, to comparing citations of OA versus non-OA articles published in the same non-OA journals. However, conclusions are not entirely consistent among fields, and two possible explications have been suggested in those fields where a citation advantage has been observed for OA: the early view and the selection bias postulates. In this study, a longitudinal and multidisciplinary analysis of the gold OA citation advantage is developed. All research articles in all journals for all subject categories in the multidisciplinary database Web of Science are considered. A total of 1,137,634 articles - 86,712 OA articles (7.6%) and 1,050,922 non-OA articles (92.4%)- published in 2009 are analysed. The citation window considered goes from 2009 to 2014, and data are aggregated for the 249 disciplines (subject categories). At journal level, we also study the evolution of journal impact factors for OA and non-OA journals in those disciplines whose OA prevalence is higher (top 36 subject categories). As the main conclusion, there is no generalizable gold OA citation advantage, neither at article nor at journal level.

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.03220