This paper demonstrates that any simple graph can be realized as a commuting graph of a Coxeter group, linking Dynkin diagrams, finite subgroups of SL(2,C), and the McKay correspondence.
Contribution
It proves the realizability of all simple graphs as commuting graphs of Coxeter groups and connects ADE Dynkin diagrams and McKay correspondence through this framework.
Findings
01
Any simple graph can be obtained as a commuting graph of a Coxeter group.
02
Dynkin diagrams of ADE type are recoverable as commuting graphs.
03
Results relate finite subgroups of SL(2,C) to Coxeter groups and McKay correspondence.
Abstract
For a group H and a non empty subset Γ⊆H, the commuting graph G=C(H,Γ) is the graph with Γ as the node set and where any x,y∈Γ are joined by an edge if x and y commute in H. We prove that any simple graph can be obtained as a commuting graph of a Coxeter group, solving the realizability problem in this setup. In particular we can recover every Dynkin diagram of ADE type as a commuting graph. Thanks to the relation between the ADE classification and finite subgroups of \SL(2,\C), we are able to rephrase results from the {\em McKay correspondence} in terms of generators of the corresponding Coxeter groups. We finish the paper studying commuting graphs C(H,Γ) for every finite subgroup H⊂\SL(2,\C) for different subsets Γ⊆H, and investigating metric properties of them when Γ=H.
Equations56
WM=⟨s1,…,sn∣(sisj)mij=1,1≤i,j≤n,mij<∞⟩.
WM=⟨s1,…,sn∣(sisj)mij=1,1≤i,j≤n,mij<∞⟩.
m_{ij}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}1&\text{, if $i=j$}\\
2&\text{, if $i\sim j$}\\
\geq 3&\text{, if $i\nsim j$.}\end{array}\right.
m_{ij}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}1&\text{, if $i=j$}\\
2&\text{, if $i\sim j$}\\
\geq 3&\text{, if $i\nsim j$.}\end{array}\right.
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Finite Group Theory Research · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Full text
COMMUTING GRAPHS ON COXETER GROUPS,
DYNKIN DIAGRAMS AND FINITE SUBGROUPS OF SL(2,C)
Umar Hayat, Álvaro Nolla De Celis and Fawad Ali
Umar Hayat, Department of Mathematics, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan
For a group H and a non empty subset Γ⊆H, the commuting graph G=C(H,Γ) is the graph with Γ as the node set and where any x,y∈Γ are joined by an edge if x and y commute in H. We prove that any simple graph can be obtained as a commuting graph of a Coxeter group, solving the realizability problem in this setup. In particular we can recover every Dynkin diagram of ADE type as a commuting graph. Thanks to the relation between the ADE classification and finite subgroups of SL(2,C), we are able to rephrase results from the McKay correspondence in terms of generators of the corresponding Coxeter groups. We finish the paper studying commuting graphs C(H,Γ) for every finite subgroup H⊂SL(2,C) for different subsets Γ⊆H, and investigating metric properties of them when Γ=H.
For a given group H with center Z(H) we can consider the commuting graph C(H) consisting of the vertex set H\Z(H) and joining two vertices if and only if they commute. This graph has been studied since [4] in several contexts and for different purposes (see [1], [7] among other examples), one of them being to characterize if given a simple graph G whether there exists or not a group H for which G≅C(H), known as the realization problem (see [9] and references therein).
In this paper we consider commuting graphs G=C(H,Γ) where Γ is a nonempty subset of a group H, for which Γ is the node set and any x,y∈Γ are joined by an edge if and only if x and y commute in H (see for example [3], [2]). Clearly C(H)=C(H,H). In this context, we are able to obtain any simple graph as the commuting graph of a certain Coxeter group WM taking Γ to be the set of generators of WM (Theorem 3.1), therefore solving the realization problem.
In addition, Coxeter groups provide us with a rich collection of groups with remarkable connections with other branches of mathematics and sciences. In this paper we are interested in the correspondences between simple laced finite Coxeter groups and finite subgroups of SL(2,C) through the simple laced Dynkin diagrams, also known as the ADE classification. Finite subgroups of H⊂SL(2,C) were classified by F. Klein around 1870 into the families of cyclic Cn, binary dihedral groups BD4n, and the exceptional cases of binary tetrahedral BT24, binary octahedral BO48 and binary icosahedral BI120. These groups have played a central role not only in group theory but in many other areas such as algebraic geometry, singularity theory, simple Lie algebras and representation theory (see [11], [14] for references and further reading).
Given a finite H⊂SL(2,C) we can consider the orbifold quotient C2/H, also known as a rational double point or Du Val singularity. J. McKay in [12] observed that the resolution graph of the singularity is precisely the (simple laced) Dynkin diagram of the subgroup H, initiating the so called McKay Correspondence (see [13]). The realization of (simple laced) Dynkin diagrams as commuting graphs C(WM,Γ) of Coxeter groups allows us to relate the geometry of the resolution of the singularity C2/H with the representation theory of H in terms of the generators Γ of WM (Theorem 3.6).
We conclude studying commuting graphs C(H,Γ) on finite subgroups H⊂SL(2,C) for different subsets Γ⊆H using the software GAP [8]. For the case Γ=H, we use this description to compute metric properties of C(H), in particular the radius, the diameter, their detour analogues and the metric dimension (Theorem 4.5).
2. Basic notions
We denote by G a graph with node set V(G) and edge set E(G). The total number of nodes of the graph G, denoted by ∣G∣, is called the order of G. We write a∼b if the nodes a and b are adjacent, otherwise a≁b.
The join of any two graphs G1 and G2, denoted by G1∨G2, is the graph with node set V(G1)∪V(G2) and edge set E(G1)∪E(G2)∪{y∼z:y∈V(G1),z∈V(G2)}. The complement of a graph G, denoted by G, is the graph with the same vertex set V(G) where a∼b in G if a≁b in G. A graph Kn with n nodes is called complete graph if any two different nodes of Kn are connected by exactly one edge. We denote by rKn the graph consisting of r copies of the complete graph Kn.
The degree deg(a) of a node a in a graph G is the number of nodes in G that are incident to a where the loops are counted twice. We may write degG(a) if we want to emphasize the underlying graph. For definitions and further explanations see [6].
3. Commuting graphs on Coxeter groups
Let M=(mij)1≤i,j≤n be an n×n symmetric matrix with mij∈N∪{∞} such that mii=1 and mij≥2 if i=j. The Coxeter group of type M is defined as
[TABLE]
See [10] for a standard reference. Observe that condition mij=1 implies that si2=1 for all i, that is, every generator has order 2. The notation mij=∞ is reserved for the case when there is no relation of the form (sisj)m=1 for any m. For example, if n=1 then WM=C2 the cyclic group of order 2 and if n=2 then M=(1mm1) and WM=D2m is the dihedral group of order 2m.
The following result observes that it is possible to realize any simple graph, i.e. any unweighted, undirected graph containing no loops or multiple edges, as the commuting graph of an (in general) infinite Coxeter group.
** Theorem 3.1****.**
Let G be a simple graph with n vertices. Then G≅C(WM,Γ) where Γ={s1,…,sn} is the set of generators of a Coxeter group WM.
Proof.
In a Coxeter group WM any pair of generators si and sj commute if and only if mij=2. Therefore, the commuting graph C(WM,Γ) is defined as the graph with vertex set Γ and where two nodes si and sj are joined if and only if mij=2. This fact allows us to recover G as the commuting graph of the Coxeter group WM of matrix type M with
[TABLE]
∎
** Example 3.2****.**
The Petersen graph is the commuting graph C(WM,Γ) where the Coxeter group WM is given by the following matrix M:
[TABLE]
The blank spaces in M correspond to any natural number greater or equal to 3 or ∞. Thus there are infinitely many Coxeter groups giving the same commuting graph.
3.1. Commuting graphs and Coxeter diagrams
Let WM be a Coxeter group with generator set Γ={s1,…,sn}. The Coxeter diagram is the graph with vertex set Γ where two nodes i and j are joined if and only if mij≥3. In the case mij>3 the edge i−j is classically labeled by mij, although in what follows we will consider just the Coxeter graph, denoted by Cox(WM), which is the Coxeter diagram forgetting the labelling.
Therefore we can associate to a given Coxeter group WM two different graphs, C(WM,Γ) and Cox(WM). The following result shows the relation between them.
** Proposition 3.3****.**
Let WM be a Coxeter group. Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
In the Coxeter graph we have that i∼j if and only if mij≥3 so the adjacency matrix A=(aij) of Cox(WM) has every entry equal to 1 except aij=0 when mij=1 or 2. On the other hand, the adjacency matrix A′=(aij′) of C(WM,Γ) has entries aij′=1 just when mij=2. Therefore A+A′ is the matrix with entries 1 if i=j and 0 if i=j, so that the corresponding graphs Cox(WM) and C(WM,Γ) are complementary.
∎
In particular C(WM,Γ) and Cox(WM) are two simple graphs of n nodes with the same automorphism group and every node corresponds to an involution si∈WM. For both graphs the degree at each vertex is related by the following formula.
** Corollary 3.4****.**
If WM is a Coxeter group and Γ={s1,…,sn}. Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Since C(WM,Γ) and Cox(WM) are complement graphs we have that
[TABLE]
where Kn is the complete graph of n vertices. Therefore
[TABLE]
∎
** Example 3.5****.**
*Let WM be the affine Coxeter group A5, which is defined by the matrix
M=132223313222231322223132222313322231. This matrix gives the adjacency matrix A=001110000111100011110001111000011100 for the graph C(A5,Γ). Thus we obtain the complementary graphs:*
[TABLE]
3.2. Commuting graphs, Dynkin diagrams and the McKay correspondence
It is well know that finite and irreducible Coxeter groups are classified by diagrams of types An(n≥1), Bn(n≥3), Dn(n≥4), E6, E7, E8, F4, G2, H3, H4 and I2(m), which correspond precisely with the semisimple Lie algebras. If we take from this classification only the ones that contains no multiple (or labelled) edges we obtain the so called Dynkin diagrams of ADE type: An, Dn(n≥4), E6, E7, E8, also named as the ADE classification.
Among several correspondences and appearances of these diagrams in other branches of mathematics, we focus in the relation of the ADE classification with finite subgroups of SL(2,C). Namely, cyclic groups Cn, binary dihedral groups BD4n, binary tetrahedral BT24, binary octahedral BO48 and binary icosahedral BI120, correspond to diagrams An, Dn, E6, E7 and E8 respectively.
Firstly, from a group theoretical point of view, Dynkin diagrams of ADE type reveals the relations between irreducible representations of the corresponding group H⊂SL(2,C) while tensoring with the natural representation V via the McKay graph (see 3.6 (b) below). Secondly, from an algebraic-geometric point of view, the quotient space C2/H has an isolated singularity at the origin for which we can construct its minimal resolution π:Y→C2/H. The exceptional set π−1(0)=∪Ei⊂Y is a finite union of rational curves, and the Dynkin diagram is the resolution graph of the singularity. In fact, the intersection matrix of the Ei is the negative of the Cartan matrix of the subgroup H (see [12]).
In the following result we rephrase both of the above observations in terms of commuting graphs of Coxeter groups.
** Theorem 3.6****.**
Let G be a Dynkin diagram of ADE type and let H be the corresponding finite subgroup H⊂SL(2,C). Then
(a)
Every Dynkin diagram of ADE type is the commuting graph C(WM,Γ) of a Coxeter group WM with Γ={s1,…,sn}.
(b)
Let H⊂SL(2,C) be the finite subgroup which corresponds to the graph G. Let IrrH={ρ0,…,ρn} be the set of irreducible representations of H, where ρ0 denotes the trivial representation, and let V be the natural representation of H. Then
[TABLE]
(c)
The Cartan matrix of H is C=2In−A where In is the identity n×n matrix and A is the adjacency matrix of C(WM,Γ). Moreover, −C is the intersection matrix of the exceptional divisors Ei, for i=1,…,n, in the minimal resolution of singularities of C2/H.
Proof.
Part (a) is a direct application of Theorem 3.1. For part (b), we first recall the construction of the McKay graph. For any ρi∈IrrH the representation V⊗ρi decomposes as a sum of irreducible representations as:
[TABLE]
The McKay graph has vertex set IrrH and has αij edges between ρi and ρj. By [12] this graph corresponds to the extended (or affine) Dynkin diagram of H. Now considering the induced subgraph of IrrH\{ρ0} and using (a), we have the αij is precisely the (i,j)-th entry of the adjacency matrix of C(WM,Γ). Therefore αij=1 if si and sj commutes in WM, that is (sisj)2=1.
For (c) again by the McKay correspondence in [12] the Dynkin diagram (or equivalently the McKay graph) is the dual graph of π−1(0), that is, there is a vertex for every Ei with i=1,…,n, and we join Ei with Ej if Ei∩Ej=∅. Since C=2In−A where A is the adjacency matrix of the Dynkin graph, by (a) the result follows.
∎
In Figure 1 we show every subgroup of SL(2,C), their corresponding ADE Dynkin graph and Coxeter matrix M. The entries mij which are not shown consist of integers greater or equal than 3 or ∞.
In what follows we concentrate the attention in the finite subgroups H⊂SL(2,C) and we investigate commuting graphs C(H,Γ) for relevant subsets Γ⊆H.
4. Commuting graphs on finite subgroups of SL(2,C)
4.1. Ciclic subgroups Cn
Since Cn=Z(Cn) this case is trivial. For any subset Γ⊆Cn we have that G=C(Cn,Γ)=Km the complete graph with m=∣Γ∣.
4.2. Binary Dihedral subgroups BD4n
The presentation of binary dihedral groups BD4n of order 4n (n≥2) is given by
[TABLE]
where the center is Z(BD4n)={e,αn}. Consider the following subsets of BD4n:
[TABLE]
** Proposition 4.1****.**
Let BD4n be a binary dihedral group and let G=C(BD4n,Γ) be a commuting graph on BD4n. We have
[TABLE]
Proof.
If Γ=Z(BD4n)={e,αn}, both elements commute with each other in BD4n, so it is the complete graph K2.
If y=αiβ and z=αn+iβ with 0≤i≤n−1 are two elements of Γ2 then y and z commute in BD4n, so C(BD4n,Γ2)≅nK2. Similarly, any two distinct elements of Γ3 commute in BD4n, so C(BD4n,Γ3)≅K2n−2.
We have that BD4n=Z(BD4n)∪Γ2∪Γ3 and notice that elements in Γ2 and Γ3 do not commute. Then we can conclude that C(BD4n,BD4n)≅K2∨(nK2∪K2n−2).
∎
4.3. Binary Tetrahedral group BT24
Let the binary tetrahedral group of order 24 be presented as
[TABLE]
Consider the following subsets of BT24:
[TABLE]
Following GAP [8] computations and using the fact that BT24=⋃i=14Bi∪⋃i=14Ci, we obtain the following result.
** Proposition 4.2****.**
Let BT24 the binary tetrahedral group and G=C(BT24,Γ) be a commuting graph on BT24. Then we have
[TABLE]
4.4. Binary Octahedral group BO48
Let the binary octahedral group be presented as
[TABLE]
Its order is 48 and consider the following subsets of BO48:
[TABLE]
Following GAP [8] computations and using the fact that BO48=⋃i=17Bi∪⋃i=14Ci∪⋃i=13Di, we obtain the following result.
** Proposition 4.3****.**
Let BO48 the binary octahedral group and C(BO48,Γ) be a commuting graph on BO48. Then we have
[TABLE]
4.5. Binary Icosahedral group BI120
Let the binary icosahedral group be presented as
[TABLE]
The order of binary icosahedral group is 120 and consider the following subsets of BI120:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Following GAP [8] computations and using the fact that BI120=⋃i=116Bi∪⋃i=110Ci∪⋃i=16Di, we obtain the following result.
** Proposition 4.4****.**
Let BI120 the binary icosahedral group and C(BI120,Γ) be a commuting graph on BI120. Then we have
[TABLE]
4.6. Distance properties of commuting graphs on finite subgroups of SL(2,C).
Let a,b be two nodes in a graph G. The distance from a to b, denoted by d(a,b), is the length of a shortest path between a to b in G. Also the length of a longest path from a to b in G is denoted by dD(a,b). An a−b path of length d(a,b) is known as a geodesic, respectively a path of length dD(a,b) is called detour geodesic.
The largest distance between a node a and any other node of G is called eccentricity, denoted by e(a). The diameterd(G) of the graph G, is the greatest eccentricity among all the nodes of the graph G. Also the radiusr(G) of the graph G is the smallest eccentricity among all the nodes of the graph G. We can define respectively the detour analogous eD(a), dD(G) and rD(G).
For an ordered subset U={u1,…,um}⊂V(G) and a node t∈G, an m-vector r(t∣U)=(d(t,u1),…,d(t,um)) is said to be the representation of t with respect to U. A set U is said be a resolving set for G if any two different nodes of the graph G have different representation with respect to U. A basis of G is a minimum resolving set for the graph G, and the metric dimensiondim(G) is the cardinality of a basis of G (see [5]).
** Theorem 4.5****.**
Let H⊂SL(2,C) be a finite subgroup. Then the radius, diameter, detour radius, detour diameter and metric dimension of the commuting graphs C(H) for finite H⊂SL(2,C) are the following:
[TABLE]
Proof.
It is clear that for any group H the graph G=C(H) contains elements in the center Z(H), so e(x)=1 for any x∈Z(H) and e(x)≤2 for x∈/Z(H). Therefore r(G)=1 for any H, and d(G)=1 if H is abelian or 2 if H is not abelian.
For rD and dD we first calculate the eccentricity eD for each vertex in G. If G=C(Cn) then eD(x)=n−1 for all x∈Cn so rD(G)=dD(G)=n−1.
If H=BD4n we know by Proposition 4.1 that G≅K2∨(nK2∪K2n−2). Then if x∈Z(BD4n) there is a x−z path of detour length 2n+1 for every z∈Γ2∪Γ3 and if x∈Γ2 (respectively x∈Γ2) there exists an x−z path of detour length 2n+3 for every z∈Γ3 (respectively for every z∈Γ3). Therefore rD(G)=2n+1 and dD(G)=2n+3.
If H=BT24 we know by Proposition 4.2 that G=C(BT24)≅K2∨(3K2∪4K4) the smallest eccentricity is achieved from an x−z path where x,z∈Z(BT24), and the greatest eccentricity is achieved from an x−z path where x∈Ci and x∈Cj with i=j. Therefore rD(G)=5 and dD(G)=13.
Similarly, for H=BO48 and H=BI120, the smallest eccentricity is achieved from an x−z path where x,z∈Z(H), and the greatest eccentricity is achieved from an x−z path where x∈Di and x∈Dj with i=j. Thus we obtain the results in the statement.
For the metric dimension dim(G) we know by [5] that G≅Kn if and only if dim(G)=n−1. Therefore, if G=C(Cn) then dim(G)=n−1.
For the case H=BD4n we have that G≅K2∨(nK2∪K2n−2). Since dim(K2)=1 and dim(K2n−2)=2n−3 we know that there exists a resolving set U of (n+1)⋅1+1⋅(2n−3)=3n−2 elements, consisting of one element of each K2 component and 2n−3 elements in K2n−2. Clearly, the sets Ui:=U∖{xi} for each xi∈U are not resolving sets, therefore U is a basis and dim(G)=3n−2.
Following the same argument, by Propositions 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 we have that
[TABLE]
so the result follows.
∎
Bibliography14
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
1[1] A. Abdollahi. (2008). Commuting graphs of full matrix rings over finite fields. Linear Algebra and its Applications , 428:2947–2954.
2[2] F. Ali, M. Salman and S. Huang. (2016). On the commuting graph of dihedral group. Communications in Algebra , 44:6, 2389–2401.
3[3] C. Bates, D. Bundy, S. Perkins and P. Rowley. (2003). Commuting involution graphs for symmetric groups. J. of Algebra 266, 133–153.
4[4] R. Brauer, K.A. Fowler (1965). On groups of even order. Ann. of Math. 62, 565–583.
5[5] G. Chartrand, C. Poisson, and P. Zhang. (2000). Resolvability and the upper dimension of graphs, Comput. Math. Appl . 39, 19–28.
6[6] G. Chartrand, P. Zhang. (2006). Introduction to graph theory. New York: Tata Mc Graw-Hill Companies Inc.
7[7] D. Dolžan, P. Oblak. (2011). Commuting graphs of matrices over semirings. J. Linear Algebra and its Applications , 435:1657–1665.
8[8] The GAP Group, GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.8.6 ; http://www.gap-system.org .