# Investigating the past history of EXors: the cases of V1118 Ori, V1143   Ori, and NY Ori

**Authors:** R. Jurdana-\v{S}epi\'c, U. Munari, S. Antoniucci, T. Giannini, G. Li, Causi, D. Lorenzetti

arXiv: 1703.02357 · 2017-06-21

## TL;DR

This study analyzes 35 years of archival photographic data of three EXor young variable stars, revealing their long-term behavior, outbursts, and the nature of their brightness variations, with implications for understanding their physical mechanisms.

## Contribution

It provides the first long-term, multi-color photometric analysis of V1118 Ori, V1143 Ori, and NY Ori, including new outburst detection and insights into their variability mechanisms.

## Key findings

- Discovered a new flare-up of V1118 Ori.
- Confirmed known outbursts and characterized quiescence phases.
- Questioned the classification of V1143 Ori as a pure EXor.

## Abstract

EXor objects are young variables that show episodic variations of brightness commonly associated to enhanced accretion outbursts. With the aim of investigating the long-term photometric behaviour of a few EXor sources, we present here data from the archival plates of the Asiago Observatory, showing the Orion field where the three EXors V1118, V1143, and NY are located. A total of 484 plates were investigated, providing a total of more than 1000 magnitudes for the three stars, which cover a period of about 35 yrs between 1959 to 1993. We then compared our data with literature data. Apart from a newly discovered flare-up of V1118, we identify the same outbursts already known, but we provide two added values: (i) a long-term sampling of the quiescence phase; and (ii) repeated multi-colour observations (BVRI bands). The former allows us to give a reliable characterisation of the quiescence, which represents a unique reference for studies that will analyze future outbursts and the physical changes induced by these events. The latter is useful for confirming whether the intermittent increases of brightness are accretion-driven (as in the case of V1118), or extinction-driven (as in the case of V1143). Accordingly, doubts arise about the V1143 classification as a pure EXor object. Finally, although our plates do not separate NY Ori and the star very close to it, they indicate that this EXor did not undergo any major outbursts during our 40 yrs of monitoring.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.02357/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.02357/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.02357/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.02357