Automorphisms and isomorphisms of Jha-Johnson semifields obtained from skew polynomial rings
Christian Brown, Susanne Pumpluen, Andrew Steele

TL;DR
This paper investigates the automorphisms and isomorphisms of Jha-Johnson semifields derived from skew polynomial rings, focusing on inner automorphisms and specific classes like Sandler, Hughes-Kleinfeld, and Knuth semifields.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of automorphisms of Jha-Johnson semifields, including those not originating from skew polynomial rings, and explores their isomorphism classes.
Findings
Characterization of automorphisms of Jha-Johnson semifields
Identification of automorphisms of Sandler and Hughes-Kleinfeld semifields
Analysis of isomorphism conditions for these semifields
Abstract
We study the automorphisms of Jha-Johnson semifields obtained from an invariant irreducible twisted polynomial , where is a finite field and an automorphism of of order , with a particualr emphasis on inner automorphisms and the automorphisms of Sandler and Hughes-Kleinfeld semifields. We include the automorphisms of some Knuth semifields (which do not arise from skew polynomial rings). Isomorphism between Jha-Johnson semifields are considered as well.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Automorphisms and isomorphisms of Jha-Johnson semifields obtained from skew polynomial rings
C. Brown
,
S. Pumplün
and
A. Steele
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
School of Mathematical Sciences
University of Nottingham
University Park
Nottingham NG7 2RD
United Kingdom
Abstract.
We study the automorphisms of Jha-Johnson semifields obtained from a right invariant irreducible twisted polynomial , where is a finite field and an automorphism of of order , with a particular emphasis on inner automorphisms and the automorphisms of Sandler and Hughes-Kleinfeld semifields. We include the automorphisms of some Knuth semifields (which do not arise from skew polynomial rings).
Isomorphism between Jha-Johnson semifields are considered as well.
Key words and phrases:
Skew polynomials, automorphisms, automorphism group, semifields, nonassociative algebras, Jha-Johnson semifields, cyclic semifields, Hughes Kleinfeld semifields, Sandler semifields.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 12K10; Secondary: 17A35, 17A60, 16S36, 17A36
Introduction
Semifields are finite unital nonassociative division algebras. Since two semifields coordinatize the same non-Desarguesian projective plane if and only if they are isotopic, semifields are usually classified up to isotopy rather than up to isomorphism and consequently, usually only their autotopism group is computed.
Among the semifields with known automorphism groups are the three-dimensional semifields over a field of characteristic not (Dickson [13] and Menichetti [24, 25]), and the semifields with 16 elements (Kleinfeld [19] and Knuth [21]). Burmester [10] investigated the automorphisms of Dickson commutative semifields of order and Zemmer [36] proved the existence of commutative semifields with a cyclic automorphism group of order . More recent results can be found for instance in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9].
Jha-Johnson semifields (also called cyclic semifields in [14]) were introduced in [18] and are generalizations of both Sandler and Hugh-Kleinfeld semifields. With the exception of one subcase, the autotopism groups of all Jha-Johnson semifields were computed by Dempwolff using representation theory [14]. One of our motivations for computing the automorphism groups of a certain family of Jha-Johnson semifields is a question by C. H. Hering [16]: Given a finite group , does there exist a semifield such that is a subgroup of its automorphism group? Another incentive arose from the search for classes of finite loops with non-trivial automorphism groups. Examples can be now obtained as the multiplicative loops of Jha-Johnson semifields [29].
We will compute the automorphism groups using noncommutative polynomials: Let be a field, an automorphism of with fixed field , a twisted polynomial ring and . In 1967, Petit [27, 28] studied a class of unital nonassociative algebras obtained by employing a right invariant irreducible .
Every finite nonassociative Petit algebra is a Jha-Johnson semifield. These algebras were studied by Wene [35] and more recently, Lavrauw and Sheekey [23].
While each Jha-Johnson semifield is isotopic to some such algebra it is not necessarily itself isomorphic to an algebra . We will focus on those Jha-Johnson semifields which are, and apply the results from [12] to investigate their automorphisms.
The structure of the paper is as follows: In Section 1, we introduce the basic terminology and define the algebras . Given a finite field , an automorphism of of order with and an irreducible polynomial of degree that is not right invariant (i.e., where is not a two-sided ideal), we know the automorphisms of the Jha-Johnson semifields if and a subgroup of them if [12, Theorems 4, 5]. The automorphism groups of Sandler semifields [30] (obtained by choosing and , ) are particularly relevant: for all Jha-Johnson semifields with and , is a subgroup of (Theorem 2). We summarize results on the automorphism groups, and give examples when it is trivial and when (Theorem 4). Inner automorphisms of Jha-Johnson semifields are considered in Section 2. In Section 3 we consider the special case that and . In this case, the algebras are examples of Sandler semifields and also called nonassociative cyclic algebras . The automorphisms of extending are inner and form a cyclic group isomorphic to . We show when and hence consists only of inner automorphisms, when contains or equals the dicyclic group of order , or when contains or equals a semidirect product, where , (Theorems 19 and 20). We compute the automorphisms for the Hughes-Kleinfeld and most of the Knuth semifields in Section 4. Not all Knuth semifields are algebras , however, the automorphisms behave similarly in all but one case. We compute the automorphism groups in some examples, improving results obtained by Wene [34]. In Section 5 we briefly investigate the isomorphisms between two semifields and . In particular, we classify nonassociative cyclic algebras of prime degree up to isomorphism.
Sections of this work are part of the first and last author’s PhD theses [11, 33] written under the supervision of the second author.
1. Preliminaries
1.1. Nonassociative algebras
Let be a field and let be an -vector space. is an algebra over if there exists an -bilinear map , , denoted by juxtaposition , the multiplication of . An algebra is called unital if there is an element in , denoted by 1, such that for all . We will only consider unital algebras without saying so explicitly.
The associator of is given by . The left nucleus of is defined as , the middle nucleus of is and the right nucleus of is . , , and are associative subalgebras of . Their intersection is the nucleus of . is an associative subalgebra of containing and whenever one of the elements lies in . The center of is .
An algebra is called a division algebra if for any , , the left multiplication with , , and the right multiplication with , , are bijective. If has finite dimension over , is a division algebra if and only if has no zero divisors [31, pp. 15, 16]. A semifield is a finite-dimensional unital division algebra over a finite field. A semifield is called proper if it is not associative. An element has a left inverse , if , and a right inverse , if . If then we denote this element by .
An automorphism is an inner automorphism if there is an element with left inverse such that for all . The set of inner automorphisms is a subgroup of . Note that if the nucleus of is commutative, then for all , is an inner automorphism of such that .
1.2. Semifields obtained from skew polynomial rings
Let be a field and an automorphism of . The twisted polynomial ring is the set of polynomials with , where addition is defined term-wise and multiplication by for all [26]. For with define and put . Then An element is irreducible in if it is not a unit and it has no proper factors, i.e if there do not exist with such that .
is a left and right principal ideal domain and there is a right division algorithm in : for all , , there exist unique with , such that [15]. From now on, we assume that
[TABLE]
is a finite field, for some prime , an automorphism of of order and
[TABLE]
i.e. is a cyclic Galois extension of degree with The norm is surjective, and is a cyclic group of order
Let have degree . Let denote the remainder of right division by . Then the additive abelian group together with the multiplication is a unital nonassociative algebra over [27, (7)]. is also denoted by if we want to make clear which ring is involved in the construction.
Note that using left division by and the remainder of left division by instead, we can analogously define the multiplication for another unital nonassociative algebra on over , called . Every algebra is the opposite algebra of some Petit algebra [27, (1)].
In the following, we call the algebras Petit algebras and denote their multiplication by juxtaposition. Without loss of generality, we will only consider monic , since for all . Let
[TABLE]
is a semifield if and only if is irreducible, and a proper semifield if and only if is not right invariant (i.e., the left ideal generated by is not two-sided), cf. [27, (2), p. 13-03, (5), (9)], or [23]. If is a proper semifield then and
[TABLE]
[23]. has order . The powers of are associative if and only if if and only if if and only if
In particular, let be monic, irreducible and not right invariant. Then
[TABLE]
and thus Moreover, we have [12, Proposition 3].
Remark 1**.**
Note that is never right invariant and that if has degree , then is never right invariant, either. For the only rght invariant are of the form , and these polynomials are not irreducible. So for , all irreducible polynomials in are not right invariant.
If the semifield has a nucleus which is larger than its center, then the inner automorphisms form a non-trivial subgroup of [34, Lemma 2, Theorem 3] and each such inner automorphism extends .
We will assume throughout the paper that is irreducible of degree , since if has degree then , and that .
We will always choose irreducible polynomials which are not right invariant, which is equivalent to being a proper semifield. Each Jha-Johnson semifield is isotopic to some Petit algebra [23, Theorem 16] but not necessarily a Petit algebra itself. We will focus on those Jha-Johnson semifields which are Petit algebras , and apply the results from [12].
1.3. Automorphisms of Jha-Johnson semifields
Assume that
[TABLE]
has degree , is monic, irreducible and not right invariant. Then is a Jha-Johnson semifield over [23]. We recall some results from [12] for the convenience of the reader: Let for some , and , such that
[TABLE]
for all . Then the map ,
[TABLE]
is an automorphism of . These form a subgroup of . In particular, if then
[TABLE]
[12, Theorems 4, 5].
An algebra with , and is called a Sandler semifield [30]. For , these algebras are also called nonassociative cyclic (division) algebras of degree , as they can be seen as canonical generalizations of associative cyclic algebras (since for , with is a classical cyclic algebra of degree as defined in [20, p. 414]). These algebras are treated in Section 3.
The automorphism groups of Sandler semifields are particularly relevant:
Theorem 2**.**
[12*, Theorem 8]** Let and be irreducible and not right invariant. Assume one of the following:
(i) and .
(ii) be such that for all .
Then is a subgroup.*
Theorem 3**.**
[12*, Theorem 9]** Let and be irreducible and not be right invariant. Assume one of the following:
(i) with .
(ii) be such that for all .
Then*
[TABLE]
Theorem 4**.**
*( [12, Theorem 5, Remark 12, Theorem 11]) Suppose , or that two consecutive coefficients and lie in .
(i) For we distinguish two cases:
If for all and all non-zero , , then .
If then any automorphism of has the form where , and*
[TABLE]
(ii) Let . If is not right invariant, then for all , the maps are automorphisms of and is isomorphic to a subgroup of .
Theorem 5**.**
*([12, Theorem 19]) Let .
(i) is a cyclic subgroup of of order .
(ii) Suppose one of the following holds:
(a) and .
(b) is prime, and at least one of is non-zero.
Then and any automorphism extends exactly one .*
Proposition 6**.**
[12*, Corollaries 13, 14]** Let , and .
(i) For all with*
[TABLE]
*the maps are automorphisms of . In particular, is an th root of unity. If these are all automorphisms of .
(ii) For all with ,*
[TABLE]
If then these groups are the automorphism groups of and , hence in that case is a subgroup of .
Corollary 7**.**
*Let and with . Let and be coprime.
(i) There are at most automorphisms extending each .
(ii) For all irreducible with , is a subgroup of .*
Proof.
(i) We know that if and only if where and is such that
[TABLE]
by Proposition 6. In particular, . So there are at most automorphisms extending each .
(ii) is obvious. ∎
2. Inner automorphisms
Let have degree , and be monic, irreducible and not right invariant. [34, Corollary 5] yields immediately:
Proposition 8**.**
Suppose for some integer . Then has at least
[TABLE]
*inner automorphisms, determined by those elements in its nucleus that do not lie in . They all are extensions of .
In particular, if has nucleus then there are inner automorphisms of and all extend ; thus all have the form for a suitable .*
Every automorphism such that is an inner automorphism. If
[TABLE]
or if
[TABLE]
these are all the automorphisms extending [12, Theorem 16].
Let denote the -conjugacy class of [22]. By Hilbert’s Theorem 90, In particular, for every there exist exactly elements with .
Proposition 9**.**
Let . Then there exist at most
[TABLE]
distinct automorphisms of of the form such that . These are inner.
Proof.
Every automorphism extending such that is an inner automorphism by [12, Theorem 16]. More precisely, for any with there are such that , , and , (cf. the proof of [12, Theorem 16]). We have
[TABLE]
Therefore there exist at most distinct automorphisms of of the form . ∎
Proposition 9 and Proposition 8 imply the following estimates for the number of inner automorphisms of :
Theorem 10**.**
Let . If has nucleus then it has inner automorphisms extending . These form a cyclic subgroup of isomorphic to .
Proof.
By Proposition 9, there are at most distinct automorphisms of and all of these are inner and extend . By Proposition 8, if has nucleus then there exist at least inner automorphisms, all extending , those determined by the elements in its nucleus which do not lie in . Then there are exactly inner automorphisms. ∎
Thus if , , is strictly contained in , then has inner automorphisms extending , with
[TABLE]
3. Nonassociative cyclic algebras
In this section unless specifically noted otherwise, let
[TABLE]
be irreducible (which is always the case if belongs to no proper subfield of ), have order and let
[TABLE]
Then is an example of a Sandler semifield [30]. is also called a nonassociative cyclic (division) algebra of degree , because its construction (hence its multiplication) is similar to the one of an associative cyclic algebra which is defined by but choosing . For , is also called a nonassociative quaternion algebra and was first described by Dickson [13]. We know that . Moreover,
[TABLE]
if and only if
[TABLE]
[12, Corollary 34].
By Theorem 10, has exactly inner automorphisms, all of them extending . These are given by the -automorphisms for all such that . The subgroup they generate is cyclic and isomorphic to .
3.1.
Theorem 11**.**
*([12, Theorem 22]) Suppose divides and let denote a non-trivial th root of unity in .
(i) is a cyclic subgroup of of order at most . If is a primitive th root of unity, then has order .
(ii) Suppose is a primitive th root of unity and . Then the subgroup generated by has order .
(iii) For each th root of unity , with and a such that , there is an automorphism extending .*
Proposition 12**.**
([12, Theorem 21]) A Galois automorphism can be extended to an automorphism if and only if there is some such that
[TABLE]
In that case, and if is prime then is a primitive th root of unity and there exist such extensions.
Theorem 13**.**
[12, Theorem 24]** Let have prime degree . Suppose that contains a primitive th root of unity, where is coprime to the characteristic of and so where is a root of an irreducible polynomial . Then is an automorphism of extending if and only if for some , where is a primitive th root of unity and for some and some power .
For more general polynomials than this yields:
Corollary 14**.**
Suppose that contains a primitive th root of unity, where is coprime to the characteristic of and so where is a root of some . Let
[TABLE]
and , such that for any , . Then every -automorphism of leaves fixed, is inner and is a subgroup, thus cyclic with at most elements.
This follows from [12, Corollary 25].
Corollary 15**.**
Suppose that does not contain an th root of unity (i.e., and are coprime). Let
[TABLE]
and . Then every -automorphism of leaves fixed, is inner and is isomorphic to a subgroup of , thus cyclic with at most elements. In particular, if has prime order, then either is trivial or .
We can also rephrase our results as follows:
Proposition 16**.**
*Let be a primitive element of , i.e. .
(i) is a cyclic subgroup of of order , containing inner automorphisms.
(ii) Suppose one of the following holds:
(a) and are coprime.
(b) is prime and a field where is coprime to the characteristic of , containing a primitive th root of unity. Let be a cyclic field extension of of degree . Let and for every , .
Then *
Proof.
If then for . In particular but for all smaller . The result now follows from [12, Theorem 21(iii)] ∎
For more general choices of twisted polynomials this means:
Theorem 17**.**
With the assumptions of Proposition 16 (ii) on and , for each irreducible
[TABLE]
* is a subgroup of and therefore cyclic of order at most .*
This is a consequence of Theorem 2.
3.2. The automorphism groups of some nonassociative cyclic algebras
In this subsection, we assume that is a field where is coprime to the characteristic of , and that contains a primitive th root of unity , so that . Let .
Lemma 18**.**
*Suppose then:
(i) .
(ii) If is odd then for all .
(iii) If is even then for all .*
Proof.
(i) We prove first that
[TABLE]
for all by induction:
Clearly (2) holds for . Suppose (2) holds for some , then
[TABLE]
Now, (q-1)|\Big{(}\big{(}\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}q^{i}\big{)}-m\Big{)} and so (2) holds by induction. In particular
[TABLE]
therefore divides \big{(}\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}q^{i}\big{)}-m+m=s as required.
(ii) and (iii): Write for some , then
[TABLE]
for all . Therefore
[TABLE]
for all . If is odd or is even then
[TABLE]
which means
[TABLE]
that is, for all . ∎
Recall that the semidirect product
[TABLE]
of and corresponds to the choice of an integer with . Let where for some , .
Theorem 19**.**
Suppose is odd or is even. Then is a group of order and contains a subgroup isomorphic to the semidirect product
[TABLE]
where . Moreover, if and are coprime, then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let , then
[TABLE]
for all where is a primitive root of unity by [12, Lemma 23]. As generates , the automorphisms of are precisely the maps , where and are such that by Proposition 12. Moreover there are exactly elements with by Proposition 12, and each of these elements corresponds to a unique automorphism of . Therefore is a group of order .
Choose such that so that . As has order , (-times) becomes where . Notice is a primitive root of unity where , then has order and so the subgroup of generated by has order .
is a cyclic subgroup of of order by Proposition 16 where is a primitive element of . Furthermore, by Lemma 18 and so is a cyclic subgroup of of order . We will prove contains the semidirect product
[TABLE]
The inverse of in is and a tedious calculation shows that
[TABLE]
Notice , i.e. , and so . Then by Lemma 18, hence . In order to prove (6), we are left to show that .
Suppose for contradiction , then for some . Therefore contains a subgroup of order generated by and so . This means , a contradiction by Lemma 18.
Therefore contains the subgroup
[TABLE]
If this subgroup has order and since , this is all of . ∎
Theorem 20**.**
Suppose is prime and .
- (i)
If then is the dicyclic group of order .
- (ii)
If then
[TABLE]
Proof.
(i) We already know that has order . Let be a primitive element. Then is a subgroup of of order by Proposition 16. Furthermore, since , there are precisely automorphisms where is such that . Pick any such . Then an easy calculation shows that , i.e. that
[TABLE]
(ii) follows immediately from Theorem 19. ∎
Recall that the smallest dicyclic group of order (this only occurs if ) is isomorphic to the quaternion group. More generally, when is a power of 2, the dicyclic group of order is isomorphic to the generalized quaternion group.
Note that if and divides then is not a semidirect product, since in this case .
Remark 21**.**
Let have characteristic not 2 and be a quadratic field extension of , then is a nonassociative quaternion algebra. Nonassociative quaternion algebras are up to isomorphism the only proper semifields of order with center and nucleus containing [W, Theorem 1]. Although being not associative, they are closely related to associatve quaternion algebras, as their multiplication can be seen as a canonical generalization of the classical Cayley-Dickson doubling process used to construct quaternion algebras out of a separable quadratic field extension [7]. If for any , then and all automorphisms are inner (as it is the case for classical quaternion algebras). If for some , then is the dicyclic group of order (Theorem 20).
4. The automorphisms of Hughes-Kleinfeld and Knuth semifields
Let be a Galois field extension of degree . Choose and a nontrivial automorphism . For the following four multiplications make the -vector space into an algebra over :
[TABLE]
The unital algebras given by each of the above multiplications are denoted , , and , respectively. The first three algebras were defined by Knuth and the last one by Hughes and Kleinfeld [17], [21]. If and , they are the same algebra with multiplication Each of the algebras is a division algebra if and only if
[TABLE]
is irreducible [17], [21]. For , and irreducible (i.e. ), we thus obtain semifields. Identifying with , we see that the Hugh-Kleinfeld algebra
[TABLE]
is a Petit algebra and that
[TABLE]
hence is the opposite algebra of a suitable Petit algebra. Thus for for some suitable by [23, Corollary 4]. Thus the automorphisms for any will be the same as for a Petit algebra .
Suppose that either or that . Then the following is well-known (cf. [17], [21]):
- •
is not contained in the left, right or middle nucleus of .
- •
and for
- •
for but is not contained in the middle nucleus.
Hence , , and are mutually non-isomorphic algebras.
We now describe all automorphisms for the algebras (hence also for ) and . We also exhibit some automorphisms for the algebra . This complements and improves the results in [34].
Theorem 22**.**
(i) All automorphisms of the Petit algebra are of the form
[TABLE]
*where and such that
(ii) All automorphisms of are of the form*
[TABLE]
*where and such that and .
In both (i) and (ii), and if , even .*
Proof.
(i) This follows from the results mentioned in Subsection 1.3, i.e. Theorem [12, Theorem 4]. Furthermore, implies , i.e since , thus . If then yields , hence . The equation implies , i.e for .
(ii) Since any automorphism preserves the left nucleus , it follows that for some . Although here we are not dealing with a Petit algebra, (ii) is now proved analogous to (i) with the same arguments as used in the proof of [12, Theorem 4], since comparing coefficients also yields for some . ∎
Corollary 23**.**
*Let and be either , or .
(i) If then
(ii) If and is not right invariant then*
[TABLE]
Proof.
Theorem 4 for implies the statement for the first two types. The argument for the third type is analogous: if then , thus forces or . If thus and If and is not right invariant then ∎
Proposition 24**.**
Let be one of the algebras or where . Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Suppose for instance . Take the automorphism . By Proposition 22, and . (Note that since , the element is determined completely by the action of on .) Substituting in and rearranging gives This implies
[TABLE]
∎
For , is not contained in any of the nuclei. However, if we assume that an automorphism of restricts to an automorphism of , then it must be of a similar form to the above automorphisms:
Proposition 25**.**
Suppose is an automorphism of which restricts to an automorphism . Then
[TABLE]
for some , such that and . In particular, and if , . If then .
The proof is similar to that of Proposition 22.
5. Isomorphisms between semifields
5.1.
If and are finite fields and
[TABLE]
two isomorphic Jha-Johnson semifields with and both monic, irreducible and not right invariant, then
[TABLE]
since isomorphic algebras have the same dimensions, and isomorphic nuclei and center.
Moreover, if is an automorphism of , is irreducible and , then induces an isomorphism [23, Theorem 7]. In the following we focus on the situation that , , , and use
[TABLE]
[12, Theorems 28 and 29] yield in this setting a generalization of [35, Theorem 4.2 and 5.4] which proved this statement only for .:
Theorem 26**.**
(i) Suppose . Then if and only if there exists and such that
[TABLE]
for all . Every such and yield a unique isomorphism ,
[TABLE]
(ii) Suppose . If there exists and such that Equation (8) holds for all then with an isomorphism as in (i).
As a direct consequence of Theorem 26 we obtain:
Corollary 27**.**
*Let .
(i) If then if and only if , for all .
(ii) If there exists an such that but or vice versa, then .*
[12, Corollaries 33, 34] yield for instance:
Corollary 28**.**
*Suppose and that one of the following holds:
(i) There exists such that and*
[TABLE]
*(ii) in ;
(iii) and ;
(iv) , and .
Then .*
Corollary 29**.**
*Let , where .
(i) if and only if there exists and such that*
[TABLE]
(ii) If for all or if then .
5.2. The isomorphism classes of nonassociative cyclic algebras of prime degree
As an example, we count how many nonisomorphic semifields there are for a given field extension .
Example 30**.**
Let and let , then we can write where . Thus for we can either choose or . Both choices will give a division algebra. We also know that if and only if or . is surjective, so for all . The statement then reduces to if and only if or . Now
[TABLE]
Therefore , so there is only one nonassociative (quaternion) algebra up to isomorphism which can be constructed using . Its automorphism group consists of inner automorphisms and is isomorphic to .
More generally we obtain:
Theorem 31**.**
(i) If does not divide then there are exactly
[TABLE]
*non-isomorphic semifields of degree .
(ii) If divides and is prime then there are exactly*
[TABLE]
non-isomorphic semifields of degree .
Proof.
Define an equivalence relation on the set by
[TABLE]
For each we have
[TABLE]
for and
[TABLE]
for . If the elements for and are all distinct, then the equivalence class of has elements. If they are not all distinct then for some , , and some ([12, Lemma 23]). If () then is an th root of unity, . This happens if and only if divides .
(i) If does not divide then from elements in we get equivalence classes.
(ii) If divides then contains all primitive th roots of unity and so where is a root of an irreducible polynomial . By [12, Lemma 23], the only elements with are the elements , , and their -scalar multiples. Moreover, for each , and , so there are only distinct elements in the equivalence class of each . Hence the elements ( and ) form exactly equivalence classes. Since these are all the elements in which are eigenvectors for the automorphisms , the remaining elements will form
[TABLE]
equivalence classes. In total, we obtain
[TABLE]
equivalence classes. ∎
Example 32**.**
Let and , i.e.
[TABLE]
There are two non-isomorphic semifields which are nonassociative quaternion algebras with nucleus , given by and . Now whereas has order 8 and is isomorphic to the group of quaternion units, the smallest dicyclic group , by Theorem 20.
By Corollary 31, these are the only non-isomorphic semifields of order of the type .
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] M. I. Al-Ali, On existence of semifields with free automorphism groups . J. Geom. 92 (1-2) (2009), 17-22.
- 2[2] M. I. Al-Ali, The automorphism group of a semifield of order q 4 superscript 𝑞 4 q^{4} . Comm. Algebra 36 (9) (2008), 3347-3352.
- 3[3] M. I. Al-Ali, Semifields with free automorphism groups . Forum Math. 20 (1) (2008), 181-186.
- 4[4] M. I. Al-Ali, Hering, C.; Neumann, A.; Rawashdeh, A. A semifield of order 5 4 superscript 5 4 5^{4} admitting a free 4-group of automorphisms . Comm. Algebra 35 (6) (2007), 1808-1813.
- 5[5] M. I. Al-Ali, On the automorphism group of a semifield of order 5 4 superscript 5 4 5^{4} . Comm. Algebra 35 (1) (2007), 71-75.
- 6[6] M. I. Al-Ali, C. Hering, A. Neumann, A. Rawashdeh, On the existence of semifields of prime power order admitting free automorphism groups . J. Geom. 86 (1-2)(2006/7), 1-5.
- 7[7] V. Astier, S. Pumplün, Nonassociative quaternion algebras over rings . Israel J. Math. 155 (2006), 125-147.
- 8[8] M. I. Bani-Ata, Mashhour; Aldhafeeri, Shuaa; Belgacem, Fethi; Laila, Mahmoud, On four-dimensional unital division algebras over finite fields. Algebr. Represent. Theory 18 (1) (2015), 215-220.
