A recurrence relation for the odd order moments of the Fabius function
S{\o}ren G. Have

TL;DR
This paper derives recurrence relations for the odd order moments of the Fabius function, linking them to even moments and providing a closed-form for the coefficients, advancing understanding of its moment structure.
Contribution
It introduces a recurrence relation for the odd order moments of the Fabius function and a closed-form expression for the coefficients involved.
Findings
Recurrence relation for odd moments in terms of even moments
Matrix formulation of the recurrence relations
Closed-form expression for the coefficients
Abstract
A simple recurrence relation for the even order moments of the Fabius function is proven. Also, a very similar formula for the odd order moments in terms of the even order moments is proved. The matrices corresponding to these formulas (and their inverses) are multiplied so as to obtain a matrix that correspond to a recurrence relation for the odd order moments in terms of themselves. The theorem at the end gives a closed-form for the coefficients.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMatrix Theory and Algorithms · Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications · Scientific Research and Discoveries
A recurrence relation for the odd order moments of the Fabius function
Søren G. Have
A simple recurrence relation for the even order moments of the Fabius function is proven. Also, a very similar formula for the odd order moments in terms of the even order moments is proved. The matrices corresponding to these formulas (and their inverses) are multiplied so as to obtain a matrix that correspond to a recurrence relation for the odd order moments in terms of themselves. The theorem at the end gives a closed-form for the coefficients.
The Fabius function satisfies
[TABLE]
We define by
[TABLE]
The 3rd property in (1) implies . Moreover
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
Let denote the coefficient of in . It follows from (2) that
[TABLE]
Which has the solution
[TABLE]
It holds that
[TABLE]
Equating the RHS and LHS of (3) we get for the following formula for :
[TABLE]
From the same equation we get for the following formula for :
[TABLE]
The formulas depends on which equals cf. the 3rd property in (1).
We define by
[TABLE]
Clearly , and if
[TABLE]
If we get
[TABLE]
The following holds c.f. theorem 6 of [1].
[TABLE]
Hence the substitution turns any recurrence relation for into a recurrence relation for the moments of the Fabius function.
For all the recurrence relations above imply the following matrix forms, where is an matrix, is a length row, is the length unit vector , and is the identity matrix
[TABLE]
Invertibility is no issue, because a pseudo-inverse suffices. The last matrix form expresses as a linear combination of previous odd-indexed s and . The coefficients are the last row of the matrix:
[TABLE]
The ’th entry of , and the ’th entry of are known from the recurrence relations:
[TABLE]
Theorem:
For all the ’th column entry of the last row of is
[TABLE]
And so for all the following recurrence relation holds:
[TABLE]
Proof:
It suffices to show that the last row of G_{i}\left(\begin{array}[]{c}2e_{1}^{i}\\ M_{i-1}\\ \end{array}\right) and M_{i}\left(\begin{array}[]{c}I_{i}\\ R_{i}\\ \end{array}\right) are the same for .
Each entry in the last row for the second matrix product consists of just 2 terms:
[TABLE]
The last row for the first matrix product:
[TABLE]
At this point the last row for both matrix products are divided by :
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Next is substituted by and is substituted by :
[TABLE]
The rows are subtracted from one another and the -function is expressed with Bernoulli numbers:
[TABLE]
We show that both parentheses equal 0. Simplifying the first parenthesis yields the summation:
[TABLE]
The sum is rewritten as the coefficient of a generating function:
[TABLE]
Hence from linear independence of the monomials we have that the first parenthesis is 0 for .
Rewriting the second parenthesis makes it
[TABLE]
the sum term of which is used as the coefficient of a generating function:
[TABLE]
Hence from linear independence of the monomials we have that
[TABLE]
∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Juan Arias de Reyna, An infinitely differentiable function with compact support: Definition and properties, Rev. Real Acad. Ciencias Madrid, 76 (1982) 21-38, English version: 1702.05442 [math.CA] .
