# Position-based coding and convex splitting for private communication   over quantum channels

**Authors:** Mark M. Wilde

arXiv: 1703.01733 · 2017-09-19

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a new lower bound on the one-shot private classical capacity of cq wiretap channels using position-based coding and convex splitting, advancing understanding of secure quantum communication.

## Contribution

It provides the first one-shot lower bound on private capacity leveraging recent coding techniques, connecting hypothesis testing mutual information and smooth max-information.

## Key findings

- Lower bound on one-shot private capacity established
- Connection between hypothesis testing mutual information and max-information
- Implications for second-order coding rate in quantum privacy

## Abstract

The classical-input quantum-output (cq) wiretap channel is a communication model involving a classical sender $X$, a legitimate quantum receiver $B$, and a quantum eavesdropper $E$. The goal of a private communication protocol that uses such a channel is for the sender $X$ to transmit a message in such a way that the legitimate receiver $B$ can decode it reliably, while the eavesdropper $E$ learns essentially nothing about which message was transmitted. The $\varepsilon $-one-shot private capacity of a cq wiretap channel is equal to the maximum number of bits that can be transmitted over the channel, such that the privacy error is no larger than $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$. The present paper provides a lower bound on the $\varepsilon$-one-shot private classical capacity, by exploiting the recently developed techniques of Anshu, Devabathini, Jain, and Warsi, called position-based coding and convex splitting. The lower bound is equal to a difference of the hypothesis testing mutual information between $X$ and $B$ and the "alternate" smooth max-information between $X$ and $E$. The one-shot lower bound then leads to a non-trivial lower bound on the second-order coding rate for private classical communication over a memoryless cq wiretap channel.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.01733/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.01733/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.01733/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.01733