# Can X(3915) be the tensor partner of the X(3872)?

## TL;DR

This paper examines whether the X(3915) can be the tensor partner of X(3872) by analyzing its possible molecular structure and helicity dominance, finding current data favors a helicity-2 dominant tensor state.

## Contribution

It investigates the molecular interpretation of the X(3915) as a tensor state related to X(3872), considering helicity components and spin symmetry, which is a novel approach.

## Key findings

- Helicity-0 component vanishes for shallow bound states.
- Experimental data favors helicity-2 dominance.
- Molecular structure remains a plausible interpretation.

## Abstract

It has been proposed recently (Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015), 022001) that the charmoniumlike state named X(3915) and suggested to be a $0^{++}$ scalar, is just the helicity-0 realisation of the $2^{++}$ tensor state $\chi_{c2}(3930)$. This scenario would call for a helicity-0 dominance, which were at odds with the properties of a conventional tensor charmonium, but might be compatible with some exotic structure of the $\chi_{c2}(3930)$. In this paper, we investigate, if such a scenario is compatible with the assumption that the $\chi_{c2}(3930)$ is a $D^*\bar D^*$ molecular state - a spin partner of the $X(3872)$ treated as a shallow bound state. We demonstrate that for a tensor molecule the helicity-0 component vanishes for vanishing binding energy and accordingly for a shallow bound state a helicity-2 dominance would be natural. However, for the $\chi_{c2}(3930)$, residing about 100 MeV below the $D^*\bar D^*$ threshold, there is no a priori reason for a helicity-2 dominance and thus the proposal formulated in the above mentioned reference might indeed point at a molecular structure of the tensor state. Nevertheless, we find that the experimental data currently available favour a dominant contribution of the helicity-2 amplitude also in this scenario, if spin symmetry arguments are employed to relate properties of the molecular state to those of the X(3872). We also discuss what research is necessary to further constrain the analysis.