# Enhanced steady-state dissolution flux in reactive convective   dissolution

**Authors:** V. Loodts, B. Knaepen, L. Rongy, A. De Wit

arXiv: 1703.01125 · 2017-10-11

## TL;DR

This paper investigates how chemical reactions influence the development and intensity of convective dissolution in stratified fluids, revealing that reactions can enhance steady-state flux and convection, with implications for CO2 sequestration.

## Contribution

It provides a numerical analysis of reactive convective dissolution dynamics, highlighting how reactions modify flux and convection intensity depending on chemical parameters.

## Key findings

- Reactions can accelerate or slow down convection.
- Chemical reactions enhance steady-state dissolution flux.
- Reactions can induce more intense convection than non-reactive cases.

## Abstract

Chemical reactions can accelerate, slow down or even be at the very origin of the development of dissolution-driven convection in partially miscible stratifications, when they impact the density profile in the host fluid phase. We numerically analyze the dynamics of this reactive convective dissolution in the fully developed non-linear regime for a phase A dissolving into a host layer containing a dissolved reactant B. We show that for a general A+B$\rightarrow$C reaction in solution, the dynamics vary with the Rayleigh numbers of the chemical species, i.e. with the nature of the chemicals in the host phase. Depending on whether the reaction slows down, accelerates or is at the origin of the development of convection, the spatial distributions of species A, B or C, the dissolution flux and the reaction rate are different. We show that chemical reactions enhance the steady-state flux as they consume A and can induce more intense convection than in the absence of reactions. This result is important in the context of CO$_2$ geological sequestration where quantifying the storage rate of CO$_2$ dissolving into the host oil or aqueous phase is crucial to assess the efficiency and the safety of the project.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.01125/full.md

## Figures

58 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.01125/full.md

## References

47 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.01125/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1703.01125