Forces and energetics of intermittent swimming
Daniel Floryan, Tyler Van Buren, Alexander J. Smits
TL;DR
This study investigates the physics and energetics of intermittent swimming, revealing that thrust and power scale linearly with duty cycle and that intermittent motions can be more energy-efficient than continuous swimming.
Contribution
It provides experimental evidence that intermittent swimming maintains similar vortex structures and can be energetically advantageous, with implications for biological and robotic swimming strategies.
Findings
Thrust and power scale linearly with duty cycle.
Vortical structures are unchanged across duty cycles.
Intermittent swimming can be more energy-efficient than continuous swimming.
Abstract
Experiments are reported on intermittent swimming motions. Water tunnel experiments on a nominally two-dimensional pitching foil show that the mean thrust and power scale linearly with the duty cycle, from a value of 0.2 all the way up to continuous motions, indicating that individual bursts of activity in intermittent motions are independent of each other. This conclusion is corroborated by PIV flow visualizations, which show that the main vortical structures in the wake do not change with duty cycle. The experimental data also demonstrate that intermittent motions are generally energetically advantageous over continuous motions. When metabolic energy losses are taken into account, this conclusion is maintained for metabolic power fractions less than 1.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
See pages 1-last of BurstCoastV6.pdf