Some fixed-circle theorems on metric spaces
Nihal Yilmaz \"Ozg\"ur, Nihal Ta\c{s}

TL;DR
This paper introduces new theorems on the existence and uniqueness of fixed circles in metric spaces, providing geometric insights and illustrative examples to demonstrate their applicability.
Contribution
It presents novel fixed-circle theorems in metric spaces, expanding fixed-point theory with geometric interpretations and verification through examples.
Findings
Established existence of fixed circles under certain conditions
Proved uniqueness of fixed circles in specific metric space contexts
Provided illustrative examples confirming theoretical results
Abstract
The fixed-point theory and its applications to various areas of science are well known. In this paper we present some existence and uniqueness theorems for fixed circles of self-mappings on metric spaces with geometric interpretation. We verify our results by illustrative examples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Some
fixed-circle theorems on metric spaces
NİHAL YILMAZ ÖZGÜR1
Balıkesir University
Department of Mathematics
10145 Balıkesir, TURKEY
and
NİHAL TAŞ1
Balıkesir University
Department of Mathematics
10145 Balıkesir, TURKEY
Abstract.
The fixed-point theory and its applications to various areas of science are well known. In this paper we present some existence and uniqueness theorems for fixed circles of self-mappings on metric spaces with geometric interpretation. We verify our results by illustrative examples.
Key words and phrases:
Fixed circle, the existence theorem, the uniqueness theorem.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
47H10, 54H25, 55M20, 37E10.
1Balıkesir University, Department of Mathematics, 10145 Balıkesir, TURKEY
1. Introduction
It has been extensively studied the existence of fixed points of functions which satisfy certain conditions since the time of Stefan Banach. At first we recall the Banach contraction principle as follows:
Theorem 1.1**.**
[2]** Let be a complete metric space and a self-mapping be a contraction, that is, there exists some such that
[TABLE]
for any . Then there exists a unique fixed point of .
Since then many authors have been studied new contractive conditions for fixed-point theorems. For example, Caristi gave the following fixed-point theorem.
Theorem 1.2**.**
[1]** Let be a complete metric space and . If there exists a lower semicontinuous function mapping into the nonnegative real numbers
[TABLE]
* then has a fixed point.*
In [6], Rhoades defined the following condition (which is called Rhoades’ condition):
[TABLE]
for all with .
In some special metric spaces, mappings with fixed points have been used in neural networks as activation functions. For example, Möbius transformations have been used for this purpose. It is known that a Möbius transformation is a rational function of the form
[TABLE]
where , , , are complex numbers satisfying . A Möbius transformation has at most two fixed points (see [3] for more details about Möbius transformations). In [4], Mandic identified the activation function of a neuron and a single-pole all-pass digital filter section as Möbius transformations. He observed that the fixed points of a neural network were determined by the fixed points of the employed activation function. So the existence of the fixed points of an activation function were guaranteed by the underlying Möbius transformation (one or two fixed points).
On the other hand, there are some examples of functions which fix a circle. For example, let be the metric space with the usual metric
[TABLE]
for all . Let the mapping be defined as
[TABLE]
for all . The mapping fixes the unit circle . In [5], Özdemir, İskender and Özgür used new types of activation functions which fix a circle for a complex valued neural network (CVNN). The usage of these types activation functions lead us to guarantee the existence of fixed points of the complex valued Hopfield neural network (CVHNN).
Therefore it is important the notions of “fixed circle” and “mappings with a fixed circle”. It will be an interesting problem to study some fixed-circle theorems on general spaces (metric spaces or normed spaces).
Motivated by the above studies, our aim in this paper is to examine some fixed-circle theorems for self-mappings on metric spaces. Also we determine the uniqueness conditions of these theorems. In Section 2 we introduce the notion of a fixed circle and prove three theorems for the existence of fixed circles of self-mappings on metric spaces. Also we give some necessary examples for obtained fixed-circle theorems. In Section 3 we present some self-mappings which have at least two fixed circles. Hence we give three uniqueness theorems for the fixed-circle theorems obtained in Section 2.
2. Existence of the self-mappings with fixed circles
In this section we give fixed-circle theorems under some conditions on metric spaces and obtain some examples of mappings which have or not fixed circles. At first we give the following definition.
Definition 2.1**.**
Let be a metric space and be a circle. For a self-mapping , if for every then we call the circle as the fixed circle of .
Now we give the following existence theorem for a fixed circle using the inequality (1.1).
Theorem 2.1**.**
Let be a metric space and be any circle on . Let us define the mapping
[TABLE]
for all . If there exists a self-mapping satisfying
*
and*
* ,
for each , then the circle is a fixed circle of .*
Proof.
Let us consider the mapping defined in (2.1). Let be any arbitrary point. We show that whenever . Using the condition we obtain
[TABLE]
Because of the condition , the point should be lies on or exterior of the circle . Then we have two cases. If then using 2 we have a contradiction. Therefore it should be . In this case, using 2 we get
[TABLE]
and so .
Hence we obtain for all . Consequently, the self-mapping fixes the circle . ∎
Remark 2.1**.**
* We note that Theorem 1.2 guarantees the existence of a fixed point while Theorem 2.1 guarantees the existence of a fixed circle. In the cases where the circle has only one element see Example 2.10 for an example Theorem 2.1 is a special case of Theorem 1.2.*
* Notice that the condition guarantees that is not in the exterior of the circle for each . Similarly the condition guarantees that is not in the interior of the circle for each . Consequently, for each and so we have see Figure 1 for the geometric interpretation of the conditions and .*
Now we give a fixed-circle example.
Example 2.1**.**
Let be a metric space and be a constant such that
[TABLE]
Let us consider a circle and define the self-mapping as
[TABLE]
for all . Then it can be easily seen that the conditions and are satisfied. Clearly is a fixed circle of .
Now, in the following examples, we give some examples of self-mappings which satisfy the condition and do not satisfy the condition .
Example 2.2**.**
Let be any metric space, be any circle on and the self-mapping be defined as
[TABLE]
for all . Then the self-mapping satisfies the condition but does not satisfy the condition . Clearly does not fix the circle .
Example 2.3**.**
Let be the usual metric space. Let us consider the circle and define the self-mapping as
[TABLE]
for all . Then the self-mapping satisfies the condition but does not satisfy the condition . Clearly does not fix the circle or any circle.
In the following examples, we give some examples of self-mappings which satisfy the condition and do not satisfy the condition .
Example 2.4**.**
Let be any metric space and be any circle on . Let be chosen such that and consider the self-mapping defined by
[TABLE]
for all . Then the self-mapping satisfies the condition but does not satisfy the condition . Clearly does not fix the circle .
Example 2.5**.**
Let be the usual complex metric space and be the unit circle on . Let us consider the self-mapping defined by
[TABLE]
for all . Then the self-mapping satisfies the condition but does not satisfy the condition . Clearly does not fix the circle or any circle. Notice that fixes only the points and on the unit circle.
Now we give another existence theorem for fixed circles.
Theorem 2.2**.**
Let be a metric space and be any circle on . Let the mapping be defined as 2.1. If there exists a self-mapping satisfying
*
and*
* ,
for each , then is a fixed circle of .*
Proof.
We consider the mapping defined in 2.1. Let be any arbitrary point. Using the condition we obtain
[TABLE]
Because of the condition , the point should be lies on or interior of the circle . Then we have two cases. If then using 2 we have a contradiction. Therefore it should be . If then using 2 we get
[TABLE]
and so we find .
Consequently, is a fixed circle of . ∎
Remark 2.2**.**
Notice that the condition guarantees that is not in the interior of the circle for each . Similarly the condition guarantees that is not in the exterior of the circle for each . Consequently, for each and so we have see Figure 2 for the geometric interpretation of the conditions and .
Now we give some fixed-circle examples.
Example 2.6**.**
Let be a metric space and be a constant such that
[TABLE]
Let us consider a circle and define the self-mapping as
[TABLE]
for all . Then it can be easily checked that the conditions and are satisfied. Clearly is a fixed circle of the self-mapping .
Example 2.7**.**
Let be the usual metric space and be the unit circle on . Let us define the self-mapping as
[TABLE]
for all . Then the self-mapping satisfies the conditions and . Hence is the fixed circle of . Notice that the fixed circle is not unique. and are also fixed circles of . It can be easily verified that satisfies the conditions and for the circles and .
In the following example we give an example of a self-mapping which satisfies the condition and does not satisfy the condition .
Example 2.8**.**
Let be any metric space and be any circle on . Let be chosen such that and consider the self-mapping defined by
[TABLE]
for all . Then the self-mapping satisfies the condition but does not satisfy the condition . Clearly does not fix the circle .
In the following example we give an example of a self-mapping which satisfies the condition and does not satisfy the condition .
Example 2.9**.**
Let be the usual metric space and be the unit circle on . Let us define the self-mapping as
[TABLE]
for all . Then the self-mapping satisfies the condition but does not satisfy the condition . Clearly does not fix the circle or any circle.
Using the inequality (1.1), we give another existence fixed-circle theorem on a metric space.
Theorem 2.3**.**
Let be a metric space and be any circle on . Let the mapping be defined as 2.1. If there exists a self-mapping satisfying
* ,
and*
* ,
for each and some , then is a fixed circle of .*
Proof.
We consider the mapping defined in 2.1. Assume that and . Then using the conditions and we obtain
[TABLE]
which is a contradiction with our assumption since . Therefore we get and is a fixed circle of . ∎
Remark 2.3**.**
Notice that the condition guarantees that is not in the exterior of the circle for each . The condition guarantees that should be lies on or exterior or interior of the circle . Consequently, should be lies on or interior of the circle see Figure 3 for the geometric interpretation of the conditions and .
Example 2.10**.**
Let and the mapping be defined as
[TABLE]
for all . Then be a metric space. Let us consider the circle and define the self-mapping as
[TABLE]
for all . Then it can be easily checked that the conditions and are satisfied. Hence the unit circle is a fixed circle of .
In the following example we give an example of a self-mapping which satisfies the condition and does not satisfy the condition .
Example 2.11**.**
Let be the usual metric space. Let us consider the circle and define the self-mapping as
[TABLE]
for all . Then the self-mapping satisfies the condition but does not satisfy the condition . Clearly does not fix the circle or any circle.
In the following example we give an example of a self-mapping which satisfies the condition and does not satisfy the condition .
Example 2.12**.**
Let be the usual metric space. Let us consider the circle and define the self-mapping as
[TABLE]
for all . Then the self-mapping satisfies the condition but does not satisfy the condition . Clearly does not fix the circle or any circle.
Example 2.13**.**
Let and the mapping be defined as
[TABLE]
for all . Then be a metric space. Let us define the self-mapping as
[TABLE]
for all . Then the self-mapping does not satisfy the condition but satisfies the condition for the circle . Hence does not fix the circle . On the other hand it can be easily checked that satisfies both of the conditions and for the circle and so fixes . Actually notice that fixes all of the circles centered at with radius .
Let be the identity map defined as for all Notice that the identity map satisfies the conditions and (resp. and , and ) in Theorem 2.1 (resp. Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.3). Now we investigate a condition which excludes in Theorem 2.1, Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.3. We give the following theorem.
Theorem 2.4**.**
Let be a metric space and be any circle on . Let the mapping be defined as . If a self-mapping satisfies the condition
[TABLE]
for all and some then and is a fixed circle of .
Proof.
Let and . Then using the inequality and the triangle inequality we get
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
which is a contradiction since . Hence we obtain and . Consequently, is a fixed circle of . ∎
Notice that the converse statement of this theorem is also true. Hence if a self-mapping in Theorem 2.1 (resp. Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.3) does not satisfy the condition given in Theorem 2.4 then can not be the identity map.
Considering the above examples we see that our existence theorems are depending on the given circle (and so the metric on ). Also fixed circle should not to be unique as seen in Example 2.7. Therefore it is necessary and important to determine some uniqueness theorems for fixed circles.
3. Some uniqueness theorems
In this section we investigate the uniqueness of the fixed circles in theorems obtained in Section 2. Notice that the fixed circle is not necessarily unique in Theorem 2.1 (resp. Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.3). We can give the following result.
Proposition 3.1**.**
Let be a metric space. For any given circles and , there exists at least one self-mapping of such that fixes the circles and .
Proof.
Let and be any circles on . Let us define the self-mapping as
[TABLE]
for all , where is a constant satisfying and . Let us define the mappings as
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
for all . Then it can be easily checked that the conditions and are satisfied by for the circles and with the mappings and , respectively. Clearly and are the fixed circles of by Theorem 2.1. ∎
Notice that the circles and do not have to be disjoint (see Example 2.7).
Remark 3.1**.**
Let be a metric space and , be two circles on . If we consider the self-mapping defined in 3.1, then the conditions and are satisfied by for the circles and with the mappings and , respectively. Clearly and are the fixed circles of by Theorem 2.2. Similarly, the self-mapping in 3.1 satisfies the conditions and for the circles and with the mappings and , respectively.
Corollary 3.1**.**
Let be a metric space. For any given circles ,, , there exists at least one self-mapping of such that fixes the circles ,, .
Example 3.1**.**
Let be a metric space and ,, be any circles on . Let be a constant such that
[TABLE]
Let us define the self-mapping by
[TABLE]
for all and the mappings as
[TABLE]
Then it can be easily checked that the conditions and are satisfied by for the circles ,, , respectively. Consequently, ,, are fixed circles of by Theorem 2.1. Notice that these circles do not have to be disjoint.
Therefore it is important to investigate the uniqueness of the fixed circles. Now we determine the uniqueness conditions for the fixed circles in Theorem 2.1.
Theorem 3.1**.**
Let be a metric space and be any circle on . Let be a self-mapping satisfying the conditions and given in Theorem 2.1. If the contraction condition
[TABLE]
is satisfied for all , and some by , then is the unique fixed circle of .
Proof.
Assume that there exist two fixed circles and of the self-mapping , that is, satisfy the conditions and for each circles and . Let and be arbitrary points. We show that and hence . Using the condition we have
[TABLE]
which is a contradiction since . Consequently, is the unique fixed circle of . ∎
Notice that the self-mapping given in the proof of Proposition 3.1 does not satisfy the contraction condition .
We give a uniqueness condition for the fixed circles in Theorem 2.2.
Theorem 3.2**.**
Let be a metric space and be any circle on . Let be a self-mapping satisfying the conditions and given in Theorem 2.2. If the contraction condition defined in 3.2 is satisfied for all , and some by then is the unique fixed circle of .
Proof.
It can be easily seen by the same arguments used in the proof of Theorem 3.1. ∎
Finally we give a uniqueness condition for the fixed circles in Theorem 2.3.
Theorem 3.3**.**
Let be a metric space and be any circle on . Let be a self-mapping satisfying the conditions and given in Theorem 2.3. If the contraction condition
[TABLE]
is satisfied for all , by , then is the unique fixed circle of .
Proof.
Suppose that there exist two fixed circles and of the self-mapping , that is, satisfy the conditions and for each circles and . Let , and be arbitrary points. We show that and hence . Using the condition we have
[TABLE]
which is a contradiction. Consequently, it should be for all , and so is the unique fixed circle of . ∎
Notice that the uniqueness of the fixed circle in Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 can be also obtained using the contraction condition . Similarly, the uniqueness of the fixed circle in Theorem 2.3 can be also obtained using the contraction condition . More generally it is possible to use appropriate contractive conditions for the uniqueness of the fixed-circle theorems obtained in Section 2.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Caristi, J. Fixed point theorems for mappings satisfying inwardness conditions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 1976; 215: 241-251.
- 2[2] Ciesielski, K. On Stefan Banach and some of his results. Banach J. Math. Anal. 2007; 1: 1-10.
- 3[3] Jones, G. A. and Singerman, D. Complex functions an algebric and geometric viewpoint. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1987.
- 4[4] Mandic, D. P. The use of Möbius transformations in neural networks and signal processing. Neural Networks for Signal Processing - Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop, 2000; 1: 185-194.
- 5[5] Özdemir, N., İskender, B. B. and Özgür, N. Y. Complex valued neural network with Möbius activation function. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2011; 16: 4698-4703.
- 6[6] Rhoades, B. E. A comparison of various definitions of contractive mappings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 1977; 226: 257-290.
