The first moment of cusp form L-functions in weight aspect on average
Olga Balkanova, Dmitry Frolenkov

TL;DR
This paper investigates the average behavior of the first moment of cusp form L-functions in weight aspect, improving error estimates and extending the mollifier length beyond previous limits.
Contribution
It introduces a new approach using Legendre polynomials to estimate error terms, enabling a longer mollifier length in the analysis.
Findings
Extended the mollifier length to 2 from the previous limit of 1.
Provided a new representation formula for error terms involving Legendre polynomials.
Achieved more precise asymptotic estimates for the first moment of L-functions.
Abstract
We study the asymptotic behaviour of the twisted first moment of central -values associated to cusp forms in weight aspect on average. Our estimate of the error term allows extending the logarithmic length of mollifier up to 2. The best previously known result, due to Iwaniec and Sarnak, was . The proof is based on a representation formula for the error in terms of Legendre polynomials.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
The first moment of cusp form -functions in weight aspect on average
Olga Balkanova
University of Turku, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Turku, 20014, Finland
and
Dmitry Frolenkov
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia and Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, 8 Gubkina st., Moscow, 119991, Russia
Abstract.
We study the asymptotic behaviour of the twisted first moment of central -values associated to cusp forms in weight aspect on average. Our estimate of the error term allows extending the logarithmic length of mollifier up to . The best previously known result, due to Iwaniec and Sarnak, was . The proof is based on a representation formula for the error in terms of Legendre polynomials.
Key words and phrases:
primitive forms; L-functions; weight aspect; Legendre polynomials
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 11F12
Research of the first author is supported by Academy of Finland project no. .
Contents
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Special functions
- 3 Exact formula for the first moment
- 4 Asymptotic approximation of Legendre polynomials
- 5 Averaging over weight
1. Introduction
The technique of mollification allows proving strictly positive non-vanishing results for different families of -functions. The idea of the method is to regularize the behavior of -functions while averaging over the family by introducing smoothing weights called mollifiers. Common choice for mollifier is a Dirichlet polynomial of length approximating the inverse of -function. It is of crucial importance to optimize the parameter , called mollifier’s length, as it determines the proportion of non-vanishing -values.
Consider the family of primitive forms of level and weight . Every has a Fourier expansion of the form
[TABLE]
The associated -function is defined by
[TABLE]
Let be the Gamma function. The completed -function
[TABLE]
satisfies the functional equation
[TABLE]
and can be analytically continued on the whole complex plane.
The harmonic summation is defined by
[TABLE]
where is the Petersson inner product on the space of level holomorphic modular forms.
The usual choice for mollifier is
[TABLE]
where parameter is called the length of mollifier.
Let be a suitable test function (see section 5 for details) and
[TABLE]
Let be the Möbius function and be the sum of divisors function. Iwaniec and Sarnak [5, Theorem 3] proved that for the mollifier with
[TABLE]
of length , one has
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Let , where parameter is called the logarithmic length of mollifier. Note that if , then it follows from functional equation (1.4) that is identically zero. For equations (1.9), (1.10) imply (see [2] for details) that at least
[TABLE]
of central -values do not vanish on average as .
Taking the largest admissible , the percentage of non-vanishing is no less than . Furthermore, according to [5, Proposition 16] any improvement over with an additional lower bound on would imply the non-existence of Landau-Siegel zeros for Dirichlet -functions of real primitive characters.
In order to break the barrier one needs to increase the length of mollifier for both first and second moments.
In the present paper we consider only the first moment and show that equation (1.9) holds for the length of mollifier for any . This extension follows from the asymptotic formula for the twisted first moment.
Theorem 1.1**.**
For all one has
[TABLE]
More precisely, the mollified moment can be expressed in terms of the twisted moment
[TABLE]
Then the length of mollifier is the largest admissible such that
[TABLE]
Therefore, for any mollifier with and any one can take . Consequently, the logarithmic length of mollifier can be extended up to .
The detailed description of the mollifier method and analogous results for an individual weight can be found in [2].
2. Special functions
For , the Gamma function is defined by
[TABLE]
By [6, Eq. 5.5.5] for one has
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
The confluent hypergeometric function
[TABLE]
can be expressed in terms of the Bessel function of the first kind
[TABLE]
Lemma 2.1**.**
For one has
[TABLE]
Proof.
Using [6, Eq. 13.2.2] and [6, Eq. 13.6.9], we write the confluent hypergeometric function in terms of the -Bessel function. Further, applying [6, Eq. 10.27.6], we prove the required result. ∎
Legendre polynomials are th degree polynomials given by Rodrigues’ formula
[TABLE]
Note that by [6, Eq. 14.7.17]
[TABLE]
Lemma 2.2**.**
For any nonnegative integer one has
[TABLE]
Proof.
The assertion follows from [6, Eq. 10.47.3] and [6, Eq. 10.54.2]. ∎
Lemma 2.3**.**
Let . As we have
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Proof.
See [4, Eq. 8.451.1] and [6, Eq. 10.17.3]. ∎
3. Exact formula for the first moment
In this section we consider the first moment of primitive -functions and show how to express the error in terms of special functions. For let us define
[TABLE]
As a consequence of the Petersson trace formula we obtain the exact formula for the twisted first moment.
Theorem 3.1**.**
For , , we have
[TABLE]
The error term is given by
[TABLE]
where .
Proof.
This formula was proved in [1, Sections 4-5] for prime power level , prime, . When the level is equal to , the function under the integral in [1, Eq. 4.16] has a pole in view of [1, Eq. 4.15]. Consequently, we cross this pole while shifting the contour of integration in the proof of [1, Lemma 4.8]. This yields the additional main term
[TABLE]
in formula (3.2). The rest of the proof is exactly the same. ∎
We are interested in the behavior of the first moment at the critical point and therefore can let .
Lemma 3.2**.**
For one has
[TABLE]
Proof.
Substituting representation (2.5) in equation (3.1) we have
[TABLE]
where . Note that . Choosing yields
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
It follows by equation (2.2) that
[TABLE]
∎
Corollary 3.3**.**
For one has
[TABLE]
Proof.
By formula [6, Eq. 10.14.4]
[TABLE]
Taking we prove the assertion. ∎
Furthermore, function has an integral representation in terms of Legendre polynomials.
Lemma 3.4**.**
For , one has
[TABLE]
Proof.
Consider representation (3.4) with . Applying (2.8) with , we obtain
[TABLE]
Since is an even integer, one has and
[TABLE]
Now we split the integral into two parts and make the change of variables in the second integral. Property (2.7) yields that
[TABLE]
for even . Finally, since we have
[TABLE]
The assertion follows. ∎
4. Asymptotic approximation of Legendre polynomials
The following theorem is obtained by taking in [3, Eq. 1.1-1.3].
Theorem 4.1**.**
(Baratella, Gatteschi, [3]) Let . Then
[TABLE]
where for fixed positive constants and one has
[TABLE]
The functions , are analytic for and defined recursively, starting from , by
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
where the constants of integration are chosen such that for any integral .
5. Averaging over weight
Let be a non-negative function, compactly supported on interval such that and
[TABLE]
Applying the Poisson summation and integrating by parts times, we have
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
In this section we prove theorem 1.1. Namely we show that for all one has
[TABLE]
The main term in (5.3) is obtained by taking in theorem 3.1 and averaging the main terms with respect to . Note that in formula (5.3) the summation is over elements of weight , and therefore, Theorem 3.1 should be used with replaced by . The same applies to all other results of Section 3.
Consider (3.3) with . Let . We split the error term into two parts
[TABLE]
where the summation in is over such that and in such that .
Lemma 5.1**.**
There exists an absolute constant such that
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let . Since one has with . By corollary 3.3
[TABLE]
Summing the result over with the test function, we prove the assertion. ∎
If with a sufficiently small implied constant, the sums over and in are empty and the error term in (5.3) can be estimated using lemma 5.1. Otherwise, the main contribution comes from the term involving , as we now show.
Lemma 5.2**.**
For any one has
[TABLE]
Proof.
It follows from lemma 3.4 that
[TABLE]
To approximate the Legendre polynomials we apply theorem 4.1 with and , i.e.
[TABLE]
where and are defined by (4.3), (4.4).
First, we estimate the contribution of the error term as follows
[TABLE]
For the main terms the largest contribution comes from the first summand, namely
[TABLE]
Indeed, two other summands have similar oscillation but they are smaller is terms of absolute value because
[TABLE]
Note that the oscillation in is only possible when . Hence let us split the integral over into two parts at the point for some absolute constant . The first part is bounded by
[TABLE]
Now we estimate the second part
[TABLE]
For the -Bessel function we apply representation (2.9). For the contribution of , is majorated by
[TABLE]
Since it is sufficient to consider only the contribution of the first summand in (2.9), which is bounded by
[TABLE]
Other summands in (2.9) have similar oscillation but are smaller in absolute value. By Poisson’s summation formula the sum over is majorated by a linear combination of expressions of the form
[TABLE]
Since one has for . Integrating by parts times, we obtain
[TABLE]
It follows from the definition of function that
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
Finally,
[TABLE]
∎
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the referee for careful reading of the manuscript and for recommending several improvements in exposition.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] O. Balkanova, D. Frolenkov, Non-vanishing of automorphic L 𝐿 L -functions of prime power level , Monat. für Math. ( 2017 2017 2017 ), published online, DOI: 10.1007/s 00605-017-1031-4, ar Xiv:1605.02434 [math.NT].
- 2[2] O. Balkanova, D. Frolenkov, Moments of L-functions and the Liouville-Green method , ar Xiv:1610.03465 [math.NT].
- 3[3] P. Baratella, L. Gatteschi, The bounds for the error term of an asymptotic approximation of Jacobi polynomials , in: Orthogonal Polynomials and Their Applications (Segovia, 1986), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1329, Springer, Berlin, New York, 1988, 203–221.
- 4[4] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products . Edited by A. Jeffrey and D. Zwillinger. Academic Press, New York, 7th edition, 2007.
- 5[5] H. Iwaniec, P. Sarnak, The non-vanishing of central values of automorphic L-functions and Landau-Siegel zeros , Israel Journal of Math. 120 120 120 ( 2000 2000 2000 ), 155 − 177 155 177 155-177 .
- 6[6] F.W.J. Olver , D.W. Lozier, R.F. Boisvert and C.W. Clarke, NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ( 2010 ) 2010 (2010) .
