Modeling observations of solar coronal mass ejections with heliospheric imagers verified with the Heliophysics System Observatory
C. M\"ostl, A. Isavnin, P. D. Boakes, E. K. J. Kilpua, J. A. Davies,, R. A. Harrison, D. Barnes, V. Krupar, J. P. Eastwood, S. W. Good, R. J., Forsyth, V. Bothmer, M. A. Reiss, T. Amerstorfer, R. M. Winslow, B. J., Anderson, L. C. Philpott, L. Rodriguez, A. P. Rouillard

TL;DR
This study evaluates a CME prediction model using 8 years of heliospheric imager data, demonstrating its capabilities and limitations in forecasting CME arrivals at Earth and other planets.
Contribution
First comprehensive validation of a CME prediction model with long-term heliospheric imager data over a solar cycle.
Findings
Prediction accuracy within 2.6 hours on average
23%-35% of predicted CME hits confirmed by in situ data
False alarms outnumber correct predictions by 2 to 3 times
Abstract
We present an advance towards accurately predicting the arrivals of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) at the terrestrial planets, including Earth. For the first time, we are able to assess a CME prediction model using data over 2/3 of a solar cycle of observations with the Heliophysics System Observatory. We validate modeling results of 1337 CMEs observed with the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) heliospheric imagers (HI) (science data) from 8 years of observations by 5 in situ observing spacecraft. We use the self-similar expansion model for CME fronts assuming 60 degree longitudinal width, constant speed and constant propagation direction. With these assumptions we find that 23%-35% of all CMEs that were predicted to hit a certain spacecraft lead to clear in situ signatures, so that for 1 correct prediction, 2 to 3 false alarms would have been issued. In addition, we find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
