The full automorphism group of $\overline{T}$
Indranil Biswas, Subramaniam Senthamarai Kannan, Donihakalu Shankar, Nagaraj

TL;DR
This paper determines the automorphism group of the closure of a maximal torus in the wonderful compactification of a simple affine algebraic group, revealing a structure involving the normalizer and Dynkin diagram automorphisms.
Contribution
It explicitly describes the automorphism group of the torus closure in the wonderful compactification, extending understanding of symmetries in algebraic group compactifications.
Findings
Automorphism group is the semi-direct product of the normalizer and Dynkin diagram automorphisms.
Special case for G=PSL(2,C), automorphism group is PSL(2,C).
Provides a complete description for all simple affine algebraic groups except PSL(2,C).
Abstract
Let be the wonderful compactification of a simple affine algebraic group of adjoint type defined over Let be the closure of a maximal torus We prove that the group of all automorphisms of the variety is the semi-direct product where is the normalizer of in and is the group of all automorphisms of the Dynkin diagram, if . Note that if , then and so in this case .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Geometric and Algebraic Topology
The full automorphism group
of
Indranil Biswas
School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India
,
Subramaniam Senthamarai Kannan
Chennai Mathematical Institute, H1, SIPCOT IT Park, Siruseri, Kelambakkam 603103, India
and
Donihakalu Shankar Nagaraj
The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, CIT Campus, Taramani, Chennai 600113, India
Abstract.
Let be the wonderful compactification of a simple affine algebraic group of adjoint type defined over Let be the closure of a maximal torus We prove that the group of all automorphisms of the variety is the semi-direct product where is the normalizer of in and is the group of all automorphisms of the Dynkin diagram, if . Note that if , then and so in this case .
Résumé. Le groupe complet des automorphismes de . Soit la compactification magnifique d’un groupe algébrique affine simple de type adjoint défini sur . Soit la clôture d’un tore maximal . Si , nous montrons que le groupe de tous les automorphismes de la variété est le produit semi-direct , où est le normalisateur de dans et est le groupe de tous les automorphismes du diagramme de Dynkin. Remarquez que si , alors et donc dans ce cas .
Key words and phrases:
Wonderful compactification, closure of maximal torus, automorphism group.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
14L10, 14L30
1. Introduction
Let be a simple affine algebraic group of adjoint type defined over the field of complex numbers. De Concini and Procesi constructed a very important compactification of [DP, p. 14, 3.1, THEOREM]; it is known as the wonderful compactification. The wonderful compactification of will be denoted by . Fix a maximal torus of , and denote by the closure of the variety in the wonderful compactification [BJ, § 1]. Let denote the group of all holomorphic automorphisms of . For the connected component of containing the identity element coincides with acting on by translations [BKN, Theorem 3.1]. Our aim here is to compute the full automorphism group .
It may be noted that is stable under the conjugation of the normalizer of in . This indicates that need not be connected.
For different from , we prove that is the semi-direct product where is the normalizer of in and is the group of all automorphisms of the Dynkin diagram (see Theorem 3.1).
2. Lie algebra and algebraic groups
We recall the set-up of [BKN]. Throughout will denote an affine algebraic group over such that is simple and of adjoint type (equivalently, the center of the simple group is trivial). We will always assume that .
Fix a maximal torus of . The group of all characters of will be denoted by . The Weyl group of with respect to is defined to be , where is the normalizer of in . Let
[TABLE]
be the root system of with respect to . For a Borel subgroup of containing the maximal torus , let denote the set of positive roots determined by and . Let
[TABLE]
be the set of simple roots in , where is the rank of . Let denote the opposite Borel subgroup of determined by and So in particular . For any , let be the reflection corresponding to .
The Lie algebras of , and will be denoted by , and respectively. The dual of the real form of is .
Now, let be the involution of defined by . We note that the diagonal subgroup of is the subgroup of fixed points of . The subgroup is a –stable maximal torus of , while is a Borel subgroup of ; this Borel subgroup has the property that for every
The group is identified with the symmetric space . Let denote the corresponding wonderful compactification of (see [DP, p. 14, 3.1, THEOREM]). In particular acts on . Let be the closure of in The action of the subgroup on preserves .
3. The automorphism group of
Let denote the group of all holomorphic automorphisms of ; any holomorphic automorphism is algebraic. Let be the connected component containing the identity element. The translation action of on itself produces an isomorphism
[TABLE]
[BKN, p. 786, Theorem 3.1].
Theorem 3.1**.**
The automorphism group is the semi-direct product where is the normalizer of in , and is the group of all automorphisms of the Dynkin diagram of .
Proof.
For notational convenience denote
[TABLE]
Note that is stable under the conjugation action of on Let
[TABLE]
be the fan of the toric variety . This consists of cones associated to the Weyl chambers (see [BK, p. 187, 6.1.6, Lemma]). Note that any automorphism of the Dynkin Diagram associated to set of simple roots with respect to preserves the fan Therefore, we have [Co, p. 47]
[TABLE]
Next we will show that .
Since in (2) is an isomorphism, it follows immediately that is a normal subgroup of . Therefore, the intersection is a stable open dense subset of for every element . Consequently, the open subset is preserved by the natural action of on . Consequently, every automorphism can be expressed as
[TABLE]
where is the left translation by some , and satisfies the condition that with being the identity element of .
By a result of Rosenlicht, the action of the (in (4)) on is by group automorphism (see [MR, p. 986, Theorem 3]). Therefore, gives an automorphism of , and hence gives an automorphism of . Since is left invariant under the action of the toric variety data of is preserved by Hence we see that the automorphism of given by preserves the fan in (3). Since is given by the Weyl chambers and its faces, we see that the induced action of on leaves the root system of in (1) invariant. Consequently, produces an automorphism of the root system .
On the other hand, the automorphism group of the root system is precisely
[TABLE]
(see [HJ, p. 231, (A.8)]). ∎
Corollary 3.2**.**
The quotient group is isomorphic to
Remark 3.3*.*
The automorphism group is trivial except for the types with , and (see [HJ, p. 231, (A.8)]).
Remark 3.4*.*
We note that the structure of the automorphism group of a complete simplicial toric variety is described by D. A. Cox (see [Co, p. 48, Corallary 4.7]).
Acknowledgements
We thank the referee for very helpful comments. The first–named author thanks the Institute of Mathematical Sciences for hospitality while this work was carried out. He also acknowledges the support of the J. C. Bose Fellowship. The second named author would like to thank the Infosys Foundation for the partial support.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[BKN] I. Biswas, S.S. Kannan and D.S. Nagaraj, Automorphisms of T ¯ , ¯ 𝑇 \overline{T}, Com. Ren. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 353 (2015), 785–787.
- 2[BJ] M. Brion and R. Joshua, Equivariant Chow ring and Chern classes of wonderful symmetric varieties of minimal rank, Transform. Groups 13 (2008), 471–493.
- 3[BK] M. Brion and S. Kumar, Frobenius splitting methods in geometry and representation theory , Progress in Mathematics, 231, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2005.
- 4[Co] D.A. Cox, The homogeneous coordinate ring of a toric variety, Jour. Alg. Geom. 4 (1995), 17–50.
- 5[DP] C. De Concini and C. Procesi, Complete symmetric varieties, Invariant theory (Montecatini, 1982), 1–44, Lecture Notes in Math., 996, Springer, Berlin, 1983.
- 6[HJ] J.E. Humphreys, Linear Algebraic Groups , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 21, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1975.
- 7[MR] M. Rosenlicht, Toroidal algebraic groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1961), 984–988.
