Coalescing versus merging of energy levels in one-dimensional potentials
Zafar Ahmed, Sachin Kumar, Achint Kumar, Mohammad Irfan

TL;DR
This paper explores how energy levels in a symmetric double well potential behave differently under Hermitian and PT-symmetric perturbations, revealing a transition from merging to coalescing at an exceptional point.
Contribution
It demonstrates that mild PT-symmetric perturbations convert level merging into coalescence at an exceptional point, linking phenomena in Hermitian and non-Hermitian quantum systems.
Findings
Levels merge into one in Hermitian case as distance increases.
PT-symmetric perturbation causes levels to coalesce at an exceptional point.
Beyond the exceptional point, eigenvalues become complex conjugates with real parts matching the original ground state energy.
Abstract
The sub-barrier pairs of energy levels of a Hermitian one-dimensional symmetric double well potential are known to merge into one, if the inter-well distance () is increased slowly. The energy at which the doublets merge are the ground state eigenvalues of independent wells (). We show that if the double well is perturbed mildly by a complex PT-symmetric potential the merging of levels turns into the coalescing of two levels at an exceptional point . For , the real part of complex-conjugate eigenvalues coincides with again. This is an interesting and rare connection between the two phenomena in two domains: Hermiticity and complex PT-symmetry.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Coalescing versus merging of energy levels in one-dimensional potentials
Zafar Ahmed1, Sachin Kumar2, Achint Kumar3, Mohammad Irfan4
Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai-85, India
Theoretical Physics Section, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai-85, India
Department of Physics, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani, Goa, 403726, India
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, 462066, India
1:[email protected],2:[email protected], 3:[email protected], 4:[email protected]
Abstract
The sub-barrier pairs of energy levels of a Hermitian one-dimensional symmetric double-well potential are known to merge into one, if the inter-well distance () is increased slowly. The energy at which the doublets merge are the ground state eigenvalues of independent (). We show that if the double-well is perturbed mildly by a complex PT-symmetric potential, the merging of levels turns into the coalescing of two levels at an exceptional point . For , the real part of complex-conjugate eigenvalues coincides with again. This is an interesting and rare connection between the two phenomena in two domains: Hermiticity and complex PT-symmetry.
In one dimensional quantum mechanics there is one to one correspondence between eigenvalues and eigenstates, there is an absence of degeneracy. So when a parameter of the Hamiltonian is varied slowly curves can not cross but they can come quite close and then diverge from each other (Avoided Crossing). Crossings and avoided crossings of levels is commonly observed in the spectra of two or three dimensional systems. Mostly, in one dimensional systems if a parameter of the potential is varied slowly, the eigenvalues increase or decrease monotonically. For particle in an infinitely deep well of width , ) decrease as function of . For harmonic oscillator potential, increase linearly as function of the frequency parameter .
Two levels coming very close may either display merging of two levels or their avoided crossing. The former is well known to occur in symmetric double-well potentials wherein the sub-barrier doublets of energy levels merge [1,2] into the levels of the independent wells when the inter-well distance is increased slowly. On the other hand AC is observed rather rarely in one dimensional systems. Recently, it has been shown [2,3] that in double-well potentials if the width or depth of the potential is varied slowly very interesting level crossings can be observed. Notably the double-well becomes asymmetric.
For one-dimensional non-Hermitian Hamiltonions, it is known that two complex eigenvalues may become real at one special value of the parameter( of the potential after this point these two eigenvalues may again be complex. Such special values of the parameter are called Exceptional Point (EP) [4]. More interestingly, when a potential PT-symmetric (invariant under the joint action of Parity: and Time-reversal (), the two discrete eigenvalues make a transition from real to complex-conjugate or vice versa. For instance, in the complex PT-symmetric potential: , is the EP of this potential when eigenvalues are real, otherwise these are complex conjugate pairs[5].
In Fig. 2(a,b,c), we show the parametric evolution of eigenvalues for various PT-symmetric potentials [6,7] and for their Hermitian counterparts.
For Double Dirac Delta Potential(DDDP, Fig. 1(a)) the formula for finding the eigenvalues of bound states [2] can be written as
[TABLE]
The solution of Schrödinger equation for the Double Dirac-delta well between two rigid walls (fig. 1(b)) is given by .
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Here,
The solution of Schrödinger equation for the square double-well potential (Fig.1(c)) is given as, and where,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
For bound states, we demand . From Eq.(7) we have , where . Finally we get,
[TABLE]
gives the eigenvalues of bound states of double-well in Fig 1(c). Using Eqs. (1,3,6), we obtain eigenvalues of the double-well potentials (Fig. 1(a,b,c)) for both cases and .
In Fig 2, by solid curves, we show the evolution of eigenvalues for three PT-symmetric potentials. By dashed curves, we show the same for Hermitian counterparts of these potentials when is replaced by . Notice the coalescing of eigenvalues at special values of , these special values are called EPs. Also note that at or around the EPs, the evolution of eigenvalues in dashed lines does not show any special feature. So the spectra of Hermitian and their complex PT-symmetric counterparts do not relate to each other well, excepting for very small values of where the eigenvalues of both coincide approximately.
In Fig. 3-5, we present the variation of eigenvalues when the distance between wells in Fig. 1(a,b,c) is increased slowly. The blue lines present the coalescing of two levels when the total potential is mildly complex PT-symmetric ( is small). See the dashed red lines for Hermitian double-well () representing merging of two levels. Green dotted and blue dot-dashed lines arise when non-Hermiticity parameter becomes large, then the coalesced levels are not contained between the merging levels (red dashed lines).
Lastly, we conclude that the models discussed here bring the spectral phenomena of coalescing and merging of energy levels closer, however we know that they occur in two different domains: Hermitian and complex PT-symmetric. Further investigations in this regard are welcome.
References
- (1) E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley New York: Wiley, 1970 pp 128–39.
- (2) Z. Ahmed, S. Kumar, M. Sharma and V. Sharma, Eur. J. Phys. 37 (2016) 045406.
- (3) Z. Ahmed, S. Pavaskar, D. Sharma and L. Prakash, arXiv: 1508.00661 [quant-ph].
- (4) T. Kato, ‘Perturbation Theory of Linear operators‘, Springer, New York (1980).
- (5) Z. Ahmed, Phys. Lett. A 282, 343 (2001); 295 287(2001).
- (6) Z. Ahmed, Phys. Lett. A 364, 12 (2007).
- (7) Z. Ahmed, Pramana j. Phys 73, 323 (2009); F.M. Fernandez, arXiv:1512.09326. [quant-ph].
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1(1) E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics , Wiley New York: Wiley, 1970 pp 128–39.
- 2(2) Z. Ahmed, S. Kumar, M. Sharma and V. Sharma, Eur. J. Phys. 37 (2016) 045406.
- 3(3) Z. Ahmed, S. Pavaskar, D. Sharma and L. Prakash, ar Xiv: 1508.00661 [quant-ph].
- 4(4) T. Kato, ‘Perturbation Theory of Linear operators‘, Springer, New York (1980).
- 5(5) Z. Ahmed, Phys. Lett. A 282 , 343 (2001); 295 287 (2001).
- 6(6) Z. Ahmed, Phys. Lett. A 364 , 12 (2007).
- 7(7) Z. Ahmed, Pramana j. Phys 73 , 323 (2009); F.M. Fernandez, ar Xiv:1512.09326. [quant-ph].
