Ambiguity invokes Creativity : looking through Quantum physics

TL;DR

This paper proposes a novel theoretical physics approach, specifically quantum theory, to model and understand the creative process and its variability among individuals, emphasizing the role of ambiguity and external stimuli.

Contribution

It introduces a quantum physics framework to explain creativity, linking conceptual jumps to quantum state transformations and suggesting experimental methods using ambiguous figures.

Findings

Quantum theory models creative jumps as non-deterministic state transitions

External stimuli influence the evolution of the creative process

Different individual creativity levels may correspond to chaotic dynamics

Abstract

Creativity, defined as the tendency to generate or recognize new ideas or alternatives and to make connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, is too vast a horizon to be summed up in such a simple sentence. The extreme abstractness of creativity makes it harder to quantify in its entirety. Yet, a lot of efforts have been made both by psychologists and neurobiologists to identify its signature. A general conformity is expressed in the Free association theory, i.e. the more freely a persons conceptual nodes are connected, the more divergent thinker (also, creative) he or she is. Also, tolerance of ambiguity is found to be related to divergent thinking. In this study, we approach the problem of creativity from a theoretical physics standpoint. Theoretically, for the initial conceptual state, the next jump to any other node is equally probable and non-deterministic. Repeated intervention of external stimulus (analogous to a measurement) is responsible for such jumps. And to study such a non-deterministic system with continuous measurements, Quantum theory has been proven the most successful, time and again. We suggest that this collection of nodes form a system which is likely to be governed by quantum physics and specify the transformations which could help explain the conceptual jump between states. Our argument, from the point of view of physics is that the initial evolution of the creative process is identical, person or field independent. To answer the next obvious question about individual creativity, we hypothesize that the quantum system, under continuous measurements (in the form of external stimuli) evolves with chaotic dynamics, hence separating a painter from a musician. Possible experimental methodology of these effects has also been suggested using ambiguous figures.