# On problems equivalent to (min,+)-convolution

**Authors:** Marek Cygan, Marcin Mucha, Karol W\k{e}grzycki, Micha{\l}, W{\l}odarczyk

arXiv: 1702.07669 · 2019-05-07

## TL;DR

This paper studies the computational complexity of the min,+-convolution problem, establishing its equivalence to other problems and exploring its role as a hardness assumption in algorithmic complexity theory.

## Contribution

The paper systematically analyzes the min,+-convolution problem, proving its equivalence to various problems and examining its use as a hardness assumption.

## Key findings

- min,+-convolution is equivalent to several classical problems.
- It serves as a foundational hardness assumption in complexity theory.
- Connections to stringology and other algorithmic problems are clarified.

## Abstract

In recent years, significant progress has been made in explaining the apparent hardness of improving upon the naive solutions for many fundamental polynomially solvable problems. This progress has come in the form of conditional lower bounds -- reductions from a problem assumed to be hard. The hard problems include 3SUM, All-Pairs Shortest Path, SAT, Orthogonal Vectors, and others.   In the $(\min,+)$-convolution problem, the goal is to compute a sequence $(c[i])^{n-1}_{i=0}$, where $c[k] = $ $\min_{i=0,\ldots,k} $ $\{a[i] $ $+$ $b[k-i]\}$, given sequences $(a[i])^{n-1}_{i=0}$ and $(b[i])_{i=0}^{n-1}$. This can easily be done in $O(n^2)$ time, but no $O(n^{2-\varepsilon})$ algorithm is known for $\varepsilon > 0$. In this paper, we undertake a systematic study of the $(\min,+)$-convolution problem as a hardness assumption.   First, we establish the equivalence of this problem to a group of other problems, including variants of the classic knapsack problem and problems related to subadditive sequences. The $(\min,+)$-convolution problem has been used as a building block in algorithms for many problems, notably problems in stringology. It has also appeared as an ad hoc hardness assumption. Second, we investigate some of these connections and provide new reductions and other results. We also explain why replacing this assumption with the SETH might not be possible for some problems.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07669/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07669/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07669/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07669