# The Stochastic complexity of spin models: Are pairwise models really   simple?

**Authors:** Alberto Beretta, Claudia Battistin, Cl\'elia de Mulatier, Iacopo, Mastromatteo, Matteo Marsili

arXiv: 1702.07549 · 2018-10-17

## TL;DR

This paper investigates the stochastic complexity of spin models with various interaction orders, revealing that model simplicity depends on the arrangement of interactions rather than their order, with fully connected pairwise models being highly complex.

## Contribution

It introduces a framework to analyze the stochastic complexity of spin models, highlighting invariances and classifying models into equivalence classes based on complexity.

## Key findings

- Models with localized, non-overlapping interactions are simple.
- Fully connected pairwise models are highly complex due to extensive interactions.
- Complexity depends on interaction arrangement, not order.

## Abstract

Models can be simple for different reasons: because they yield a simple and computationally efficient interpretation of a generic dataset (e.g. in terms of pairwise dependences) - as in statistical learning - or because they capture the essential ingredients of a specific phenomenon - as e.g. in physics - leading to non-trivial falsifiable predictions. In information theory and Bayesian inference, the simplicity of a model is precisely quantified in the stochastic complexity, which measures the number of bits needed to encode its parameters. In order to understand how simple models look like, we study the stochastic complexity of spin models with interactions of arbitrary order. We highlight the existence of invariances with respect to bijections within the space of operators, which allow us to partition the space of all models into equivalence classes, in which models share the same complexity. We thus found that the complexity (or simplicity) of a model is not determined by the order of the interactions, but rather by their mutual arrangements. Models where statistical dependencies are localized on non-overlapping groups of few variables (and that afford predictions on independencies that are easy to falsify) are simple. On the contrary, fully connected pairwise models, which are often used in statistical learning, appear to be highly complex, because of their extended set of interactions.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07549/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07549/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07549/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07549