# On normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons

**Authors:** W.W. Koczkodaj, J.-P. Magnot, J. Mazurek, J.F. Peters, H., Rakhshani, M. Soltys, D. Strza{\l}ka, J. Szybowski, A. Tozzi

arXiv: 1702.07205 · 2017-02-28

## TL;DR

This paper justifies the normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons to the [0,1] range, discusses related issues, and introduces a new paradox of infinity.

## Contribution

It provides mathematical and practical justification for normalization and describes a novel paradox related to inconsistency measures.

## Key findings

- Normalization to [0,1] is justified mathematically and practically.
- Problems arise from lack of normalization.
- A new paradox of infinity is introduced.

## Abstract

In this study, we provide mathematical and practice-driven justification for using $[0,1]$ normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons. The need for normalization, as well as problems with the lack of normalization, are presented. A new type of paradox of infinity is described.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07205/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07205/full.md

## References

21 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07205/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.07205