# The Ages of the Thin Disk, Thick Disk, and the Halo from Nearby White   Dwarfs

**Authors:** Mukremin Kilic, Jeffrey A. Munn, Hugh C. Harris, Ted von Hippel, James, W. Liebert, Kurtis A. Williams, Elizabeth Jeffery, Steven DeGennaro

arXiv: 1702.06984 · 2017-03-22

## TL;DR

This study estimates the ages of the Galaxy's thin disk, thick disk, and halo using local white dwarf samples, revealing distinct formation timelines and improving age accuracy by accounting for thick disk contributions.

## Contribution

It provides the first comprehensive age estimates for all three major Galactic components from a large white dwarf sample, including the thick disk.

## Key findings

- Thin disk age: 6.8-7.0 Gyr
- Thick disk age: 8.7 Gyr
- Halo age: 12.5 Gyr

## Abstract

We present a detailed analysis of the white dwarf luminosity functions derived from the local 40 pc sample and the deep proper motion catalog of Munn et al (2014, 2017). Many of the previous studies ignored the contribution of thick disk white dwarfs to the Galactic disk luminosity function, which results in an erronous age measurement. We demonstrate that the ratio of thick/thin disk white dwarfs is roughly 20\% in the local sample. Simultaneously fitting for both disk components, we derive ages of 6.8-7.0 Gyr for the thin disk and 8.7 $\pm$ 0.1 Gyr for the thick disk from the local 40 pc sample. Similarly, we derive ages of 7.4-8.2 Gyr for the thin disk and 9.5-9.9 Gyr for the thick disk from the deep proper motion catalog, which shows no evidence of a deviation from a constant star formation rate in the past 2.5 Gyr. We constrain the time difference between the onset of star formation in the thin disk and the thick disk to be $1.6^{+0.3}_{-0.4}$ Gyr. The faint end of the luminosity function for the halo white dwarfs is less constrained, resulting in an age estimate of $12.5^{+1.4}_{-3.4}$ Gyr for the Galactic inner halo. This is the first time ages for all three major components of the Galaxy are obtained from a sample of field white dwarfs that is large enough to contain significant numbers of disk and halo objects. The resultant ages agree reasonably well with the age estimates for the oldest open and globular clusters.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.06984/full.md

## Figures

10 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.06984/full.md

## References

55 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.06984/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.06984