Comment on "Quantum mechanics for non-inertial observers"
Igor Pikovski, Magdalena Zych, Fabio Costa, \v{C}aslav Brukner

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent claim about gravitational potential and internal-external coupling in quantum mechanics, clarifying a mistake that led to an incorrect conclusion about gravitational redshift effects.
Contribution
It identifies and corrects a specific error in a recent publication claiming a necessary cancellation of relativistic coupling in gravitational fields.
Findings
The claimed cancellation of relativistic coupling is incorrect.
The paper clarifies the role of gravitational redshift in quantum systems.
A specific mistake in the prior paper is pinpointed and corrected.
Abstract
In a recent paper (arXiv:1701.04298 [quant-ph]) Toro\v{s}, Gro{\ss}ardt and Bassi claim that the potential necessary to support a composite particle in a gravitational field must necessarily cancel the relativistic coupling between internal and external degrees of freedom. As such a coupling is responsible for the gravitational redshift measured in numerous experiments, the above statement is clearly incorrect. We identify the simple mistake in the paper responsible for the incorrect claim.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
