# A $\frac{3}{2}$-Approximation Algorithm for Tree Augmentation via   Chv\'atal-Gomory Cuts

**Authors:** Samuel Fiorini, Martin Gro{\ss}, Jochen K\"onemann, Laura, Sanit\`a

arXiv: 1702.05567 · 2017-02-27

## TL;DR

This paper presents a new LP-based approximation algorithm achieving a .5+ approximation for the weighted tree augmentation problem with bounded link costs, improving previous guarantees and matching SDP-based bounds.

## Contribution

It introduces a strong LP with Chvtal-Gomory cuts that improves approximation guarantees for WTAP with bounded costs.

## Key findings

- Achieves a .5+ approximation for WTAP with bounded costs.
- Develops an efficient solvable LP that is exact for core instances.
- Matches the best SDP-based approximation bound for TAP.

## Abstract

The weighted tree augmentation problem (WTAP) is a fundamental network design problem. We are given an undirected tree $G = (V,E)$, an additional set of edges $L$ called links and a cost vector $c \in \mathbb{R}^L_{\geq 1}$. The goal is to choose a minimum cost subset $S \subseteq L$ such that $G = (V, E \cup S)$ is $2$-edge-connected. In the unweighted case, that is, when we have $c_\ell = 1$ for all $\ell \in L$, the problem is called the tree augmentation problem (TAP).   Both problems are known to be APX-hard, and the best known approximation factors are $2$ for WTAP by (Frederickson and J\'aJ\'a, '81) and $\tfrac{3}{2}$ for TAP due to (Kortsarz and Nutov, TALG '16). In the case where all link costs are bounded by a constant $M$, (Adjiashvili, SODA '17) recently gave a $\approx 1.96418+\varepsilon$-approximation algorithm for WTAP under this assumption. This is the first approximation with a better guarantee than $2$ that does not require restrictions on the structure of the tree or the links.   In this paper, we improve Adjiashvili's approximation to a $\frac{3}{2}+\varepsilon$-approximation for WTAP under the bounded cost assumption. We achieve this by introducing a strong LP that combines $\{0,\frac{1}{2}\}$-Chv\'atal-Gomory cuts for the standard LP for the problem with bundle constraints from Adjiashvili. We show that our LP can be solved efficiently and that it is exact for some instances that arise at the core of Adjiashvili's approach. This results in the improved guarantee of $\frac{3}{2}+\varepsilon$. For TAP, this is the best known LP-based result, and matches the bound of $\frac{3}{2}+\varepsilon$ achieved by the best SDP-based algorithm due to (Cheriyan and Gao, arXiv '15).

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.05567/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.05567/full.md

## References

24 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.05567/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.05567