Symmetric bi-skew maps and symmetrized motion planning in projective spaces
Jes\'us Gonz\'alez

TL;DR
This paper explores the differences between two symmetric topological complexities of projective spaces, characterizes them via symmetric maps, and computes these complexities for certain real projective spaces, advancing understanding of their embedding dimensions.
Contribution
It characterizes symmetric topological complexities of real projective spaces through symmetric maps and computes these complexities for specific cases, linking to classical embedding problems.
Findings
$TC^ ext{Sigma}(RP^m)$ characterized by symmetric $bZ_2$-biequivariant maps
Computed $TC$ numbers for $RP^{2^e}$, $e eq 0$
Identified the torus $S^1 imes S^1$ as the only unknown case
Abstract
This work is motivated by the question of whether there are spaces for which the Farber-Grant symmetric topological complexity differs from the Basabe-Gonz\'alez-Rudyak-Tamaki symmetric topological complexity . It is known that, for a projective space , captures, with a few potentially exceptional cases, the Euclidean embedding dimension of . We now show that, for all , is characterized as the smallest positive integer for which there is a symmetric -biequivariant map with a "monoidal" behavior on the diagonal. This result thus lies at the core of the efforts in the 1970's to characterize the embedding dimension of real projective spaces in terms of the existence of symmetric axial maps. Together with Nakaoka's description of the cohomology ring of symmetric squares,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
