# Reply to "Comment on `Quantum Raychaudhuri Equation'"

**Authors:** Saurya Das

arXiv: 1702.05219 · 2017-04-05

## TL;DR

This paper defends the validity of the Quantum Raychaudhuri Equation against criticisms, reaffirming its derivation and implications without identifying any errors or issues.

## Contribution

It provides a rebuttal to claims of problems in the original derivation of the Quantum Raychaudhuri Equation, confirming its correctness and significance.

## Key findings

- No issues found with the original derivation
- The implications of the Quantum Raychaudhuri Equation remain valid
- The critique does not affect the original results

## Abstract

The above comment [E. I. Lashin, D. Dou, arXiv:1606.04738] claims that the paper "Quantum Raychaudhuri Equation" by S. Das, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 084068 [arXiv:1404.3093] has "problematic points" with regards to its derivation and implications. We show below that the above claim is incorrect, and that there are no problems with results of the above paper or its implications.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.05219/full.md

## References

14 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.05219/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.05219